References
- Farley, F. H., & Ahn, S. (1973). Experimental aesthetics: Visual aesthetic preference in five cultures. Studies in Art Education, 15(1), 44–48.
- Farley, F. H., & Dowling, P. M. (1972). Aesthetic preference in adolescents as a function of race and visual complexity. Studies in Art Education, 13(2), 23–27.
- Gardner, H. & Gardner, J. (1973). Developmental trends in sensitivity to form and subject matter in paintings. Studies in Art Education, 14(2), 52–56.
- Gardner, H. (1973–74). The contribution of color and texture to the development of painting styles. Studies in Art Education, 15(3), 57–62.
- Hamblen, K. A. (1984). Artistic perception as a function of learned expectations. Art Education, 37(3), 20–25.
- Hardiman, G. W., & Zernich, T. (1977). The influence of style and subject matter on the development of children's art preferences. Studies in Art Education, 19(1), 29–35.
- Hardiman, G. W., & Zernich, T. (1982). The relative influence of parts and wholes in shaping preference responses to paintings. Studies in Art Education, 23(3), 31–38.
- Korzenik, D. (1976). Creativity: Producing solutions to a problem. Studies in Art Education, 17(2), 29–35.
- McFee, J. K. (1991). Art education progress: A field of dichotomies or a network of mutual support. Studies in Art Education, 32(2), 70–82.
- Rosen, F. B. (1968). Philosophic systems and education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishers.
- Salkind, L., & Salkind, N. (1973). A measure of aesthetic preference. Studies in Art Education, 15(1), 21–27.
- Taunton, M. (1980). The influence of age on preferences for subject matter, realism, and spatial depth in painting reproductions. Studies in Art Education, 21(3), 40–53.