Aesthetigrams: Mapping Aesthetic ExperiencesFootnote

1 I would like to thank David Pariser of Concordia University for his encouraging comments and helpful suggestions based on a first draft of this paper. Thanks are also due to the members of the Studies Editorial Board. Their insights, challenging questions, and considerable labour are an integral part of the final draft.

References

• Anderson, T. (1988). A structure for pedagogical art criticism. Studies in Art Education, 38(1), 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, M. (1958). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, M. (1969). Aesthetic experienced regained. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 28(1), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. (1970). The aesthetic field: A phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Best, D. (1984). The dangers of “aesthetic education.” Oxford Review of Education, 11(1), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Best, D. (1996). Values in the arts. In J. M. Halstead & M. J. Taylor (Eds.) Values in education and education in values (pp. 79–91). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cliburn, J. W. (1990, February). Concept maps to promote meaningful learning. JCST, 212–217.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszenthmihalyi, N., & Robinson, R. (1990). The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. Malibu, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum and The Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1958). Art as experience (16th ed.). New York: Capricorn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, G. (1964). Myth of the aesthetic attitude. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(1), 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie, G. (1966). Attitude and object: Aldrich on the aesthetic. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 25(1), 89–91.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, G. (1971). Aesthetics: An introduction. New York: Pegasus.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, G. (1974). Beardsley's theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 8(2), 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York and London: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, H. (1989). The art response guide: How to read art for meaning, a primer for art criticism. Art Education, 42(3), 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. (1987). Varieties of visual experience (3rd ed.). New York: Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Housen, A. (1983). The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1977). Phenomenological psychology: Lectures, summer semester, 1925 (John Scanlon, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Jagodzinski, J. (1981). Aesthetic education reconsidered: Or please don't have an aesthetic experience. Art Education, 34(3), 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, S. (1957). Expressiveness. In Problems of art: Ten philosophical lectures, (pp. 13–26). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, V. (1987). A*R*T, a friendly alternative to D.B.A.E. Art Education, 40(5), 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lankford, L. E. (1984). A phenomenological methodology for art criticism. Studies in Art Education, 25(3), 151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. J. (1986). The place of a cognitive approach to aesthetic response. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20(4), 107–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. J. (1987a). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. J. (1987b). Talk about a painting: A cognitive developmental analysis. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 21(1), 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, S. (1988). Aesthetic education: Metaphor and the understanding of works of art. Canadian Review of Art Education: Research and Issues, 15(2), 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (1989a). The sense of art: A study in aesthetic education. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (1989b). Discipline-based art education. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spader, P. H. (1994). Phenomenology and the claiming of essential knowledge. Husserl Studies, 11, 169–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, C. J. (1995). Critical conversations about art: A description of higher-order thinking generated through the study of art criticism. Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 170–188.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G. R. (1989). What is…concept mapping? Medical Teacher, 11(3/4), 265–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weltzl-Fairchild, A. (1991). Describing aesthetic experience: Creating a model. Canadian Journal of Education, 16(3), 267–280.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. (1993). Aesthetic judgments as a basis for value judgments. Canadian Review of Art Education: Research and Issues, 20(2), 99–115.
   Google Scholar