Beliefs of Preservice Teachers toward Art Education

References

• Abelson, R. (1979). Differences between belief systems and knowledge systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 355–366.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 44(1), 373–397.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1989). Teaching by the book: What prospective teachers learn and what they need to know. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(1), 401–423.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, R. V., & Stokes, D. K. (1994). Analyzing personal teaching metaphors in preservice teacher education as a means of encouraging professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 197–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, J. (1995). Art education research at Nanyang Technological University. InSEA News, 2(3), 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. J. (1990). Teacher education for the visual arts, in W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 746–757). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1990). Themes in teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 3–24). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1972). The promise of teacher education. Art Education, 25(3), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1973). Art education belief index. Stanford, CA: Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W., Laswell, B., & Wieder, C. (1973). What do prospective art teachers believe about the teaching of art? Unpublished paper. Stanford, CA: Standford University.
   Google Scholar
• Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, H. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 32–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. Toronto: OISE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, L. (1991). Analysing an art methods course: Implications for teaching primary student-teachers. Journal of Art and Design Education, 10(3), 329–342.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, L. (1993). Familiar, interactive, and collaborative pedagogy: Changing practices in preservice art education. Art Education, 46(5), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, L. (1994). NAEA task force on teacher education. InSEA News, 1(3), 21.
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative reseachers. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. U., & MacGregor, R. N. (1987). Proacta: Personally relevant observations about art concepts and teaching activities. Canadian Review of Art Education, 14(1), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. U., & MacGregor, R. N. (1991). Art teaching: Simple facts about complex activities. Journal of Art & Design Education, 10(3), 281–291.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. U., & MacGregor, R. N. (1991). A cross-Canada study of high school art teachers. Canadian Journal of Education, 16(1), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmett, P. P. (1995). Reconceptualizing teacher education: Preparing teachers for revitalized schools. In P. Gimmett & M. Wideen (Eds.), Changing times in teacher education: Restructuring or reconceptualization (pp. 202–225). London, UK: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. (1991). What are we talking about anyway? Subject matter knowledge of secondary English teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (p. 225–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S. (1994). Considerations of the content and circumstances of secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 20(1), 179–222.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. New York: Paragon.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 160–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Smith, J. A., Moon, B. J., & Wideen, M. F. (1994). Learning to teach within the two cultures of the humanities and the sciences. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, H. (1982). The place of teachers' beliefs in research on teacher thinking and decision making, an alternate methodology. Instructional Science, 11(1), 201–225.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the study of teachers' beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(1), 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. (1992). A description and analysis of the preconceptions about art and art education held by elementary education students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S., & Grauer, K. (1994). A comparison of belief and preconceptions of preservice teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• National Art Education Association. (1993). Creating a visual arts research agenda toward the 21st century: Report of the Research Commission. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prawat, R. (1992). Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, S. (1993). Art, imagination, and teaching: Researching the high school classroom. Canadian Journal of Education, 18(4), 366–380.
   Google Scholar
• Roland, C. (1995). The use of journals to promote reflective thinking in prospective art teachers. In L. Galbraith (Ed.), Preservice art education: Issues and practice (pp. 119–134). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, M., Shumard, S., & Homan, H. (1994). Dialogue journals with preservice art teachers: A study by three university student teacher supervisors. Arts and Learning, 11(1), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, S., & McMillan, J. H. (1993). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1992). Renewing the pedagogy of teacher education: The impact of subject-specific conceptions of teaching. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Subject Specific Teaching Methods in Teacher Education, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Shank, D. (1992). Art attitudes, belief, and stories of pre-service elementary teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 different ways” of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers thinking, (pp. 104–124) London: Cassell Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. (1990). The secret garden of teacher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(2), 204–209.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, E. (1994). Current research and practice about pre-service visual art specialist teacher education. Studies in Art Education, 35(2), 79–89.
   Google Scholar