An Examination of Intrinsic and Instrumental Instruction in Art Education

References

• Anges, Michael (Ed). 2000. Webster's new world college dictionary (4th ed.). Foster City, CA: IDG Books Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Bickley-Green, C. (1995). Math and art curriculum integration: A postmodern foundation. Studies in Art Education, 37(1), 6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, T. (1991). An examination of two approaches to ceramic instruction in elementary education. Studies in Art Education, 21(4), 196–206.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, T. (1995). An examination of untutored thematic and observational drawings made by third and seventh-grade students. Visual Arts Research, 21(2), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, T. (1998a). Arts advocacy and research: To what end? Arts Education Policy Review, 99(5), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, T. (1998b). The relationship of art instruction, grade-level, and gender on third- and seventh-grade student drawing. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 132–146.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, T., & Colbert, C. (1992). The effect of contrasting instructional strategies on seventh-grade students' ceramic vessels. Studies in Art Education, 34(1), 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D. (2001). A quartile analysis of the 1997 NAEP Visual Art Report Card. Studies in Art Education, 43(1), 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J., Horowitz, R., & Abeles, H. (2000). Learning in and through the arts: The question of transfer. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 228–257.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, C. (1984). The relationship of language and drawing in description and memory tasks. Studies in Art Education, 25(2), 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, L., Dziuban, C., Hynes, M., & Olson, A. (1996). Does a standard reflect minimal competency of examinees or judge competency? Applied Measurement in Education, 9(2), 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measures: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• D'Amico, V. (1942). Creative teaching in art. Scranton, PA: International Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1998a). Limits and uses of research in the teaching of art. Videotape presentation at 1998 NAEA Conference. Seminar for Research in Art Education.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1998b). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Art Education, 51(1), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Forseth, S.D. (1980). Art activities, attitudes, and achievement in elementary mathematics. Studies in Art Education, 21(2), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, J., Gall, M.D., & Borg, W. (1999). Applying educational research: A practical guide (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hamblen, K. (1997). Theories and research that support art instruction of instrumental outcomes. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(3), 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, S. (1997). Drumbeats and cadences, creativity and education. In Proceeding and Recommendations for the Drumbeat 96 Conference, T. Brewer and D. Morris (Eds.) (pp. 7–11). University of Southern Mississippi: College of the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Kindler, A. (1987). A review of rationales for integrated arts programs. Studies in Art Education, 29(1), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kindler, A. (1991). Integrated curriculum and the visual arts. Journal of Art Teachers, 31, 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., & Berk, E. (1991). Principal findings of the National Arts Education Research Center. New York: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Siegesmund, R., Diket, R., & McCulloch, S. (2001). Re-visioning NAEP: Amending a performance assessment for middle school art students. Studies in Art Education, 43(1), 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. (1988). Conducting educational research (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). The NAEP arts report card, NCES 1999–486, by H.R. Persky, B.A. Sandene, and J.M. Askew. Project Office, Sheida White. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D.F., & Schaffarzick, J. (1981). Comparing curricula. In Hardiman & Zernich, Foundations for curriculum development and evaluation in art education, (pp. 213–241).
   Google Scholar
• Willett, L.V. (1992). The efficacy of using the visual arts to teach math and reading concepts. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (Educational Resources Information Center PS 020784).
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (2000). The arts and academic improvement: What the evidence shows. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar