Teachers' Working Conditions and the Unmet Promise of Technology

References

• Anderson, F. (1985). Electronic media, videodisc technology, and the visual arts. Studies in Art Education, 26(4), 224–231.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D. (2001). How do we teach? Results of a national survey of instruction in art education. Studies in Art Education, 42(2), 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B. S., & Taylor, P. G. (2003). Racing thoughts: Altering our ways of knowing and being in art through computer hypertext. Studies in Art Education, 45(1), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1995). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congdon, K. G. (1997). CAUTION! Technology in the classroom may be harmful. In D. Gregory, (Ed.). New technologies in art education: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 107–114). Reston: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, J., & Duthie, B. (1993). Primary children and computer-based art work; Their learning strategies and context. Art Education, 46(6), 23–26, 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• D'Angelo, J. (1988). Computers for art teachers. Art Education, 41(5), 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. Wittrock (Ed.). Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 392–432). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. A. (1995/96). Art education and technology: These are the days of miracles and wonder. The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 15/16. 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, P. (1996). More power: Integrated interactive technology and art education. Art Education, 49(6), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ettinger, L. (1988). Art education and computing: Building a perspective. Studies in Art Education, 30(1), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern art education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. H. (1985). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, N J: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (1991). Possibilities of interactive computer graphics for art instruction. Art Education, 44(3), 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (1997). Teaching technology for meaning. Art Education, 50(4), 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. (1997). The medium and the message: Issues and concerns. In D. C. Gregory (Ed.). New Technologies in art education: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 115–122). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, L. (1997). Enhancing art teacher education with new technologies: Research possibilities and practices. Art Education, 50(5), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, E. (2004). MOO: Using a computer gaming environment to teach about community art. Art Education, 57(4), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Garoian, C. R., & Gaudelius, Y. M. (2001). Cyborg pedagogy: Performing resistance in the digital age. Studies in Art Education, 42(4), 333–347.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D. C. (1989). Hypermedia: Laser video/audio technology and art education. Art Education, 42(1), 66–69.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D. C. (1996). Art education reform: Technology as savior. Art Education, 49(6).49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Greh, D. (1986). Using computers in secondary education. Art Education, 39(6), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Halsey-Dutton, B. (2002). Artifacts in Cyberspace: A model of implementing technology into art history education. Art Education, 55(4), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, D., & Grandgenett, N. F. (1996). Perspectives on the use of Internet in art classrooms. Art Education, 49(6). 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. (1993). Technology and aesthetic education: A crucial synthesis. Art Education, 46(6), 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G., & Greh, D. (1991). Integrating computing into art education: A progress report. Art Education, 44(3), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G. (1989). Hypermedia: Cause for optimism in art curriculum design. Art Education, 42(1), 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, G. (1995). Electronic artstrands: Computer delivery of art instruction. Art Education 48(2), 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving in-service training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37(5), 379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (1996). Interfacing Hypermedia and the Internet with critical inquiry in the arts: Preservice training. Art Education, 49(6), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (1997). Interactive hyperdocuments: Implications for art criticism in a postmodern era. In J. Hutchens & M. Suggs (Eds.) Art education: Content and practice in a postmodern era (pp. 122–131). Reston: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K., Amburgy, P.M., & Knight, W. B. (2003). Three approaches to teaching visual culture in K-12 contexts. Art Education, 56(2), 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Koos, M., & Smith-Shank, D. L. (1996). The World Wide Web: Alice meets cyberspace. Art Education, 49(6), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (Ed.). (1996). Art and ecology: Interdisciplinary approaches to the curriculum. Santa Monica, CA: J.P. Getty Foundation, The Getty Center for the Arts in Education, [url: http://www.getty.edu/artsednet/resources/Ecology/]
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (1997). Electronic learning communities and art education. Arts and Learning Research. American Educational Research Association Special Interest Group 14, 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (1999). ePortfolios and Critical Inquiry in Art Education. Proceedings from the 1999 InSEA World Congress. Brisbane, Australia. 1(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (2002). Electronic media and everyday aesthetics of simulation. Visual Arts Research, 28(2), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lankford, E. L., & Mims, S. K. (1995). Time, money, and the new art education: A nationwide investigation. Studies in Art Education, 36(2), 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Madeja, S. S. (1983). Computer graphics: The new subject matter for the art curriculum. Art Education, 36(3). 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Madeja, S. S. (1993). The age of the electronic image: The effect on art education. Art Education, 16(6). 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Marschalek, D. (1989). The National Gallery of Art laserdisc and accompanying database: A means to enhance art instruction. Art Education, 44(3), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Marschalek, D. B. (2002). Building better Web-based learning environments: Thinking in “3′s” ? Art Education, 55(4), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M., & Thomas, M. (1985). Art history, art criticism, and art production: An examination of art education in selected school districts. Los Angeles: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Mercedes, D. (1996). Digital ethics: Computers, photographs, and the manipulation of pixels. Art Education, 49(3), 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Morbey, M. L. (1997). Women, discriminating computer technology, and arts education. In D. C. Gregory (Ed.). New technologies in art education: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 155–162). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Obiokor, P. (2002). A study of secondary art teachers' knowledge, interpretation, and implementation of major art education reform initiatives with implications for art teacher education. Unpublished dissertation completed at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, P. (2004). Technology and Art Education: What do we really know about it? NAEA Advisory, Spring 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Prater, M. (2001). Constructivism and technology in art. Art Education, 54(6), 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Roland, C. (1997). Distance learning and art education. In D. C. Gregory (Ed.). New technologies in art education: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 41–50). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (1991). The power and potential of laserdisc technology for art education in the 90s. Art Education, 44(3), 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Slawson, B. (1993). Interactive multimedia: The gestalt of a gigabyte. Art Education, 46(6), 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz M. A., & Garber, E. (2000). Cyberfaculty: An experience in distance learning. Art Education, 53(1), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Stokrocki, M. (1986). Qualitative interpretation of a microcomputer graphics course for gifted and talented adolescents. Art Education, 39(1), 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. G., & Carpenter, S. (2002). Inventively linking: Teaching and learning with computer hypertext. Art Education, 55(4), 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszkiewicz, F. (1997). A ten year perspective on visual art technology. Art Education, 50(4). 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Villeneuve, P. (2002). Editorial: Friend or foe? Art Education, 55(4), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions of classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record 104(3). 482–515. [PDF file] retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar