Lines of Sight in the “Network Society”: Simulation, Art Education, and a Digital Visual Culture

References

• Alexander, C. (1988) A city is not a tree. In J. Thakara (Ed.), Design after modernism: Beyond the object (p. 67–84). New York: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. (Original work published 1981)
   Google Scholar
• Baumgaertel, T. (2001). Interview with Bill Brown (surveillance camera players). (Available on-line at: www.rhizome.org. accessed 4/04)
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.) Illuminations (H. Arendt, Trans.). New York: Schocken. (Original work published 1955).
   Google Scholar
• Bukatman, S. (2000). Terminal penetration. In D. Bell & B. Kennedy (Eds.) The Cybercultures Reader (p. 149–174). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. A., Day, M. D., & Greer, W. D. (1989). Discipline-based art education: Becoming students of art. In R. Smith (Ed.). Discipline-based art education: Origins, meaning, and development, (p. 129–193). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (originally published 1987)
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. D. (1984). The practice of everyday life. (S. Rendall, Trans.) Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, P. (2001). More power: Integrated interactive technology and art education. Art Education, 54(6). 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2002). Wrestling with tv “rasslin.” The Journal for Social Theory in Art Education, 22, 103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 36(3). 134–153.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K., & Schuler, K. (2002). Please stand by for this important message: Television in art education. Visual Arts Research 28(2), 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Garoian, C., & Gaudelius, Y. (2001). Cyborg pedagogy. Performing resistance in a digital age. Studies in Art Education, 42(4). 333–347.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, W. (1984) Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, R. (2000, May). Web work: A history of Internet art. Artforum, 38, 162–167, 190.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In A. Jones (Ed.), The feminism and visual culture reader. (pp. 475–496). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, D., & Grandgenett, N. (2001). Perspectives on the use of Internet in art classrooms. Art Education, 54(6), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (1996). Interfacing hypermedia and the Internet with critical inquiry in the arts: Preservice training. Art Education, 49(6)), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (1997). Interactive hyperdocuments: Implications for art criticism in a postmodern era. In J. Hutchens & M. Suggs (Eds.), Art education: Content and practice in a postmodern era (p. 122–131). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (2002) Electronic media and everyday aesthetics of simulation. Visual Arts Research, 28(2), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (1997) Electronic learning communitites in art education. Arts and Learning Research, 14(23).
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. (1998). What is visual culture? In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.), The visual culture reader (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, B. (1996). The work of culture in the age of cybernetic systems. In T. Druckery (Ed.) Electronic culture (pp. 121–143). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prater, M. (2001). Constructivism and technology in art education. Art Education, 54(6), 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2003). Connected, or what it means to live in the network society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Stelarc. (2000). From psycho-body to cyber-systems: Images as post-human entities. In D. Bell & B. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (p. 560–576). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stokrocki, M. (2002). Shopping malls from preteen and teenage perspectives. Visual Arts Research, 28(2), 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeny, R. (2004). Between devil and detournement? Situationist tactics as critical inquiry in educational spaces. Journal of Surveillance and Society. Available FTP: Hostname: surveillance-and-society.org.
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K. (2002). Engaging advertisements: Looking for meaning in and through art education. Visual Arts Research, 28(2), 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., & Carpenter, S. (2003, Fall). Racing thoughts: Altering our ways of knowing and being in art through computer hypertext. Studies in Art Education, 45(1). 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., & Carpenter, S. (2002). Inventively linking: Teaching and learning with computer hypertext. Art Education, 55(4), 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tolva, J. (1996). Ut pictura hyperpoesis: Spatial form, visuality, and the digital word (on-line document available at: http://www.cs.unc.edu/∼barman/HT96/P43/pictura.htm. accessed 7/04)
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar