References
- American Assembly. (1997). The arts and the public purpose. New York: American Assembly.
- Americans for the Arts. (2007). Arts & economic prosperity III: The economic impact of nonprofit arts and culture organizations and their audiences. Washington, DC: Americans for the Arts.
- American Political Science Association. (2004). Task force on inequality and American democracy: American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Retrieved November 25, 2007 from http://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/taskforcereport.pdf
- Americans for the Arts. (2004). Sources of revenue for nonprofit arts organizations. Retrieved December 29, 2007 from http://www.artsusa.org/pdf/get_involved/advocacy/research/2007/resources.pdf
- Bersson, R. (1984). For cultural democracy in art education. Art Education, 37(6), pp. 40–44.
- Brooks, A. (2004). In search of true public arts support. Public Budgeting & Finance, 22(2), pp. 88–100.
- Bush, R. (2003, December). United arts funds: Meeting the challenge of increased private sector support for the arts. Monograph, pp. 1–8.
- Cook, A., & Strom, E. (2004). Old pictures in new frames: Issue definition and federal arts policy. Review of Policy Research, 21(4), pp. 505–522.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
- Dewey, J. (1920/1957). Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
- Duncum, P. (2003). The theories and practices of visual culture in art education. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(2), pp. 19–25.
- Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), pp. 132–140.
- Freedman, K. (2000). Social perspectives on art education in the U.S.: Teaching visual culture in a democracy. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), pp. 314–330.
- Friedman, C.S., & Hopkins, K. (1997). Successful fundraising for arts and cultural organizations. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.
- Goldbard, A. (2006). New creative community: The art of cultural development. Oakland, CA: New Village Press.
- Goldbard, A., & Adams, D. (1981). Cultural democracy vs. the democratization of high culture. Social Policy, 12(1), pp. 52–56.
- Graves, J. (2005). Cultural democracy: The arts, community and the public purpose. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Ivey, W. (2008). Arts, inc.: How greed and neglect have destroyed our cultural rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Ivey, W. (2005, February 4). America needs a new system for supporting the arts. [Electronic Version]. The Chronicle Review, 51(22), page B6.
- jagodzinski, j. (2004). Questioning fantasies of popular ‘resistance’: Democratic populism and radical politics in visual cultural studies. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 24(1), p. 257.
- Karl, B. (1998). Volunteers and professionals: Many histories, many meanings. In W. Powell & E. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good. (pp. 245–257). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
- Kreidler, J. (1996). Leverage lost: The nonprofit arts in the post-Ford era. Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 26(2), pp. 79–100.
- La Piana, D. (1998). Beyond Collaboration: Strategic Restructuring of Nonprofit Organizations, Revised Edition. NCNB Funder Briefing. James Irvine Foundation and the National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
- Larson, R. (2006). Building intergenerational bonds through the arts. Generations, 30(1), pp. 38–41.
- Lewis, G. B. (2006). Public spending on the arts as morality policy: The structure of public attitudes. The Policy Studies Journal, 34(1). pp. 131–138.
- Muthukumaraswamy, M. D. (2002). Voicing folklore: Careers, concerns and issues: A collection of interviews. Chennai, India: National Folklore Support Centre.
- National Endowment for the Arts. (1985). Supporting the arts: An international comparative study. J.M. Schuster, (Ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Communications National Endowment for the Arts.
- National Endowment for the Arts. (2000). A brief chronology of federal support for the arts. K. Wood & B. Koostra, (Eds.). Washington, DC: Office of Communications, National Endowment for the Arts.
- National Endowment for the Arts. (2007). How the United States funds the arts. (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Office of Research and Analysis.
- Pauly, N. (2003). Interpreting visual culture as cultural narratives in teaching education. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), pp. 264–284.
- Popper, K. R. (1950). The open society and its enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Rushton, M. (2004). Earmarked taxes for the arts: US experience and policy implications. International Journal of Arts Management, 6(3), pp. 38–48.
- Stuhr, J. (1997). Genealogical pragmatism: Philosophy, experience and community. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Tavin, K. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), pp. 197–213.
- Vilar, A. (2003). The next wave of arts funding. Editor and Publisher, 136(1), pp. 12–17.
- Walker, H. (2001). Interviewing local artists: A curriculum resource in art teaching. Studies in Art Education, 42(3), pp. 249–266.