A Semiotic Reading and Discourse Analysis of Postmodern Street Performance

References

• Anderson, T. (1993). Defining and structuring art criticism for education. Studies in Art Education, 4(34), 199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M. (2004). Semiotic redefinition of art in a digital age, In D. Smith-Shank (Ed.), Semiotics and visual culture: Sights, signs, and significance (pp. 124–131). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Auslander, P. (1992). Presence and resistance: Postmodernism and cultural politics in contemporary American performance. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Baldick, C. (2004). The concise Oxford dictionary of literary terms. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, T. (1994). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholl, A. (2006). Map. Retrieved October 25, 2007, from http://www.datenform.de/
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1988). Simulacra and simulation. In M. Poster (Ed.), Selected writing. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss, S. (2004). Putting on the Lamb. ARTnews. 103(9), 164–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecht, B., & Willett, J. (2001). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Broudy, H. S. (1972). Enlightened cherishing: An essay on aesthetic education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. (2006). New learning environment for the 21st century: Exploring the edge. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38(5), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B. S., & Taylor, P. G. (2006). Making meaningful connections: Interactive computer hypertext in art education. Computers in the Schools, 23(1/2), 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Chaplin, E. (1994). Sociology and visual representation. New York: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. K. (2007). Art education technology: Digital storytelling. Art Education, 60(2), 17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. (1998). Doors and mirrors in art education: Constructing the postmodernist classroom. Art Education, 51(6), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2004). Visual culture isn’t just visual: Multiliteracy, multimodality and meaning. Studies in Art Education, 45(3), 252–264.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert, T. (1991). The “difference” of postmodernism feminism. College English, 53, 886–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efland, A. D., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough. N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. B. (1981). Varieties of visual experience. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Felshin, N. (1995). Introduction. In N. Felshin (Ed.), But is it art? The spirit of art as activism (pp. 9–29). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firrincili, D. (2006). Hammons, David. Current Biography, 67(5), 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, H. (1985). Recordings: Art, spectacle, cultural politics. Port Townsend: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garoian, C. (1999). Performing pedagogy: Toward an art of politics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudelius, Y., & Speirs, P. (2002). Contemporary issues in art education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (2004). What videogames have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, E. (1995). Guerrilla Girl power: Why the art world needs a conscience. In N. Felshin (Ed.), But is it art? The spirit of art as activism (pp. 309–332). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, H. (2003). A philosophical inquiry into the nature of computer art. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37(1), 13–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• jagodzinski, j. (2004). Lacan’s innovation of semiotics: Psychoanalysis as a methodology for art education as visual cultural studies. In D. Smith-Shank (Ed.), Semiotics and visual culture: Sights, signs, and significance (pp. 139–149). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• jagodzinski, j. (2005). Virtual reality’s differential perception: On the significance of Deleuze (and Lacan) for the future of visual art education in a mechanic age. Visual Arts Research, 31(1), 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. (1984, July/August). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. The New Left Review, 146, 53–92.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffers, C. (2000). Drawing on semiotics: Inscribing a place between formalism and contexutalism. Art Education, 53(6), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. (Ed.). (2002). A handbook of media and communication research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2001). Visual meaning: a social semiotic approach. In T. van Leewen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 134–156). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J., & McLaren, P. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 279–313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leewen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D. (2002). Teaching art in the context of everyday life. In Y. Gaudelius & P. Speirs (Eds.), Contemporary issues in art education (pp. 180–195). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nead, L. (1988). Myths of sexuality: Representations of women in Victorian Britain. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. (1995). Maintenance activity: Creating a climate for change. In N. Felshin (Ed.), But is it art? The spirit of art as activism (pp. 165–193). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, B. (2003). The art of public disturbance. Art in America, 91(5), 120–3, 158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sakatani, K. (2005). Harmony quest: An interdisciplinary arts-based project incorporating virtual reality. Visual Arts Research, 31(1), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Shank, D. (1995). Semiotic pedagogy and art education. Studies in Art Education, 36(4), 233–241.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, K. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games. The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 2(1). Retrieved October 25, 2007, from http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/squire/
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, R. (2004). Lines of sight in the “Network Society”: Simulations, art education, and a digital visual culture.Studies in Art Education, 46(1), 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1997). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyrick, M. (2004). Feminist semiotics in the art of Hung Liu and Carolee Schneeman. In D. Smith-Shank (Ed.), Semiotics and visual culture: Sights, signs, and significance (pp. 80–85). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar