Publication Cover
Studies in Art Education
A Journal of Issues and Research
Volume 51, 2010 - Issue 2
1,246
Views
70
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Paradigm Analysis of Arts-Based Research and Implications for Education

Pages 102-114 | Published online: 25 Nov 2015

References

  • Barone, T. (2006). Arts-based educational research then, now, and later. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 4–8.
  • Barone, T. (2008). How arts-based research can change minds. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 28–49). New York: Routledge.
  • Beittel, K. (1973). Alternatives for art education research. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
  • Behar, R. (2008). Between poetry and anthropology: Searching for languages of home. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 55–71). New York: Routledge.
  • Bickel, B. (2008). Who will read this body? An a/r/tographic statement. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 125–136). New York: Routledge.
  • Cahnmann-Taylor, M. (2008). Arts-based research: Histories and new directions. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 3–15). New York: Routledge.
  • Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Siegesmund, R. (Eds.). (2008). Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Carroll, K. L. (1997). Researching paradigms in art education. In S. D. La Pierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp. 171–192). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
  • Clark, R. (1998). Doors and mirrors in art education: Constructing the postmodernist classroom. Art Education, 51(6), 6–11.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). On the line. [Johnston, J., Trans.] New York: Semiotext(e), Inc.
  • Desai, D., & Chalmers, G. (2007). Notes for a dialogue on art education in critical times. Art Education, 60(5), 6–12.
  • Dewey, J. (1989). Art as experience. In J. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953 (pp. 1–400). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1934).
  • Eisenhart, M., & Howe, K. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 642–680). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1965). Curriculum ideas in a time of crisis. Art Education, 18(7), 7–12.
  • Eisner, E. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4–9.
  • Eisner, E. W. (2008). Persistent tensions in arts-based research. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 16–27). New York: Routledge.
  • Florentine Films (Producer), & Burns, K. (Director). (2000). Jazz: The story of America’s music [ Motion picture]. Washington, D.C.: PBS Home Video.
  • Garoian, C. R. (1999). Performing pedagogy: Toward an art of politics. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gerbner, G. (1995, November 28). The problem is the problem. Message originally posted to [email protected]. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://kerlins.net/bobbi/research/qualresearch/problem.html
  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, (pp. 1–51). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gude, O. (2007). Principles of possibility: Considerations for a 21st-century art & culture curriculum. Art Education, 60(1), 6–17.
  • Irwin, R. L., & Springgay, S. (2008). A/r/tography as practice-based research. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 103–124). New York: Routledge.
  • Jackson, A. Y. (2004). Performativity identified. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(5), 673–690.
  • James, W. (1890/1952). The principles of psychology, 1. New York: Henry Holt.
  • Kearney, R. (1988). The wake of imagination: Toward a postmodern culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–277.
  • Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693.
  • Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Leggo, C. (2008). The ecology of personal and professional experience: A poet’s view. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 89–97). New York: Routledge.
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry: The paradigm revolution. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • London, P. (1992). Art as transformation. Art Education, 45(3), 8–15.
  • Macleod, K., & Holdridge, L. (Eds.). (2006). Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Marshall, J. (2008). Visible thinking: Using contemporary art to teach conceptual skills. Art Education, 61(2), 38–45.
  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mullen, C. A. (2003). Guest editor’s introduction: A self-fashioned gallery of aesthetic practice. Qualitative Inquiry. 9(2), 165–181.
  • Nachmanovitch, S. (1990). Free play: The power of improvisation in life and the arts. New York: Tarcher/Putnam Books.
  • Newton, R. M. (2005). Learning to teach in the shadows of 9/11: A portrait of two Arab American preservice teachers. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 81–94.
  • Olomo, O. O. & Jones, J.L. (2008). sista docta, REDUX. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 194–207). New York: Routledge.
  • Pearse, H. (1983). Brother, can you spare a paradigm? The theory beneath the practice. Studies in Art Education, 24(3), 158–163.
  • Pearse, H. (1992). Beyond paradigms: Art education theory and practice in a postparadigmatic world. Studies in Art Education, 33(4), 244–252.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
  • Rolling, J. H. (2006). Who is at the city gates? A surreptitious approach to curriculum-making in art education. Art Education, 59(6), 40–46.
  • Rolling, J. H. (2008). Rethinking relevance in art education: Paradigm shifts and policy problematics in the wake of the Information age. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 9 (Interlude 1). Retrieved May 11, 2008, from http://www.ijea.org/v9i1/
  • Sanders, J. H., III. (2006). Performing arts-based education research: An epic drama of practice, precursors, problems and possibilities. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 89–107.
  • Siegesmund, R., & Cahnmann-Taylor, M. (2008). The tensions of arts-based research in education reconsidered: The promise for practice. In M. Cahnmann-Taylor & R. Siegesmund (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 231–246). New York: Routledge.
  • Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. New York & London: Garland Publishing.
  • Slattery, P. (2001). The educational researcher as artist working within. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(3), 370–398.
  • Springgay, S. (2002). Arts-based research as an uncertain text. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 1–30.
  • Steiner, G. (1989). Real presences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Stevens, W. (1954). The collected poems of Wallace Stevens. New York: Knopf.
  • Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: Inquiry in the visual arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Sullivan, G. (2006). Research acts in art practice. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 19–35.
  • Taylor, P. G., Wilder, S. O., & Helms, K.R. (2007). Walking with a ghost: Arts-based research, music videos, and the re-performing body. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 8(7). Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http://ijea.asu.edu/v8n7/
  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wasson, R. F., Stuhr, P. L., & Petrovich-Mwaniki, L. (1990). Teaching art in the multicultural classroom: Six position statements. Studies in Art Education, 31(4), 234–246.
  • West, C. (1991). Theory, pragmatisms, and politics. In J. Arac & B. Johnson (Eds.), Consequences of theory (pp.22–38). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Wilson, B. (1997). The second search: Metaphor, dimensions of meaning, and research topics in art education. In S. D. La Pierre & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies for art education (pp. 1–32). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.