References
- Barret, T. (2000). Criticizing Art. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
- Britzman, D. P. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: Toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Cancienne, M. B. & Snowber, C. N. (2003). Writing rhythm: Movement as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 237–253.
- Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
- Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Greene, M. (1997). Metaphors and multiples: Representation, the arts, and history. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 387–394.
- Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts based research practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba. E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Pearse, H. (1983). Brother can you spare a paradigm? The theory beneath the practice. Studies in Art Education, 24(3), 158–163.
- Sullivan, G. (1999). An identity crisis for art education. Artlink: Australian Contemporary Art Quarterly, 19(2), 43–44).
- Sullivan, G. (2004). Studio art as research practice. In E. W. Eisner & M.D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 795–814). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Sullivan, G. (2010). Art practice as research: Inquiry in visual arts (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.