Relational Making: Re/Imagining Theories of Child Art

References

• Bishop, C. (2005). Art of the encounter: Antagonism and relational aesthetics. Circa, 114(Winter), 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. (1990). Curator interview, Tate Modern. Retrieved from www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/video/tate-triennial-2009-altermodern-nicolas-bourriaud
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon, France: Le press du reel.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. (2009a). The radicant. New York, NY: Lucas and Steinbeg.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. (2009b). Altermodern: Tate triennial. London, England: Tate.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N., & Scheider, C. (2005). Postproduction: Culture as screenplay: How art reprograms the world. New York, NY: Lukas and Stemberg.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J. (2009). Creative intelligence, creative practice: Lowenfeld redux. Studies in Art Education, 50(4), 323–337.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guatarri, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Capatalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
   Google Scholar
• Desai, D., Hamlin, J., & Mattson, R. (2010). Investigating history and art: A teaching toolkit. In D. Desai, J. Hamlin & R. Mattson (Eds.), History as art, art as history: Contemporary art and social studies education (pp. 83–94). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. (1986). Transitions and tensions: interrelationships between the drawing, talking, and dictating of young children. Young Children, 20(4), 379–409.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. (1992). Symbol makers, symbol weavers: How children link play, pictures and print. Young Children, 45(2), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. (2003a). The brothers and sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school cultures. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. (2003b). Popular literacies and the “all” children: Rethinking literacy development for contemporary childhoods. Language Arts, 81(2), 100–109.
   Google Scholar
• Fineberg, J. (1997). The innocent eye: Children’s art and the modern artist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gandini, L. (2005). In the spirit of the studio. Learning from the atelier of Reggio Emilia. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garoian, C., & Gaudelius, Y. (2008). Spectacle pedagogy: Art, politics and visual culture. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern principles: In search of a 21st century art education. Art Education, 57(1), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, J. H., & Katz, L. (2011). Young investigators: The project approach in the early years. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1974). Tools for conviviality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., & James, A. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy, and social practice. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H. (2004). Choice words: How language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Leeds, A. (1989). A history of attitudes towards children’s art. Studies in Art Education, 30(2), 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld, V. (1957). Creative and mental growth. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meecham, P., & Sheldon, J. (2000). Modern art: A critical introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Narey, M. J. (Ed.). (2009). Making meaning: Constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning through arts-based early childhood education. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. (2001). Towards a theory of children’s drawing as social practice. Studies in Art Education, 42(4), 348–365.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, (2005). Relational aesthetics and critical culture. In Proceedings transforming aesthetics, 1–19. Sydney, Australia: Art Gallery of New South Wales. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/6996/1/6996.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, C. M. (2011). Verbalizations in children’s drawing performances: Toward a metaphorical continuum of inscription, extension, and re-inscription. Studies in Art Education, 53(1), 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sidorkin, A. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools and dialogue with evil. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, K. (2009). General introduction. In K. Stiles & P. H. Selz (Eds.), Theories and documents of contemporary art: A sourcebook of artists’ writings (pp 1–10). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, P. (2003). Reflections on the image of the child: Reproducer or creator of culture. Art Education, 56(4), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (1995a). The visual arts in early childhood learning. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (1995b). What should I draw today? Sketchbooks in early childhood. Art Education, 48(5), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (1999). Action, autobiography and aesthetics in young children’s self initiated drawings. Journal of Art & Design Education, 18(2), 155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (2002). Drawing together: Peer influence in preschool-kindergarten art classes. In L. Bresler & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives: Context, culture and curriculum (pp. 129–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (2003). Kinderculture in the art classroom: Early childhood art and the mediation of culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(2), 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (2005). The “ket” aesthetic. In J. Fineberg (Ed.), When we were young: New perspectives on the Art of the child. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (2006). Repositioning the visual arts in early childhood education: A decade of reconsideration. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 233–278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (2007). The culture of childhood and the visual arts. In L. Bressler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education, (pp. 899–914). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M., & Bales, S. (1991). “Michael doesn’t like my dinosaurs”: Conversations in a preschool art class. Studies in Art Education, 33(1), 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchi, V. (2010). Art and creativity in Reggio Emilia: Exploring the role and potential of ateliers in early childhood education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2003a). Of diagrams and rhizome: Visual culture, contemporary art and the impossibility of mapping the content of art education. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 214–229.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2003b). Three sites for visual culture pedagogy: Honoring students interests and imagery. International Journal of Arts Education, 1(3), 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2004). Child art after modernism: Visual Culture and new narratives. In M. Day & E. Eisner (Eds.), Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education (pp. 299–328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1977). An iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in the drawings of young people. Art Education, 30(1), 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1980). Cultural recycling: the uses of conventional configurations, images and themes in narrative drawings of American children. In J. Condous, J. Howlett & J. Skull (Eds.), Arts in cultural diversity (pp. 277–281). Syndney, Autstralia: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood. Meaning making and children’s drawing. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yelland, N., Lee, L., O’Rourke, M., & Harrison, C. (2008). Rethinking learning in early childhood education. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar