Publication Cover
Studies in Art Education
A Journal of Issues and Research
Volume 61, 2020 - Issue 4
4,628
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Art Education Beyond Anthropocentricism: The Question of Nonhuman Animals in Contemporary Art and Its Education

References

  • Aaltola, E., & Keto, S. (2017). Empatia: Myötäelämisen tiede. Helsinki, Finland: Into.
  • Agamben, G. (2004). The open: Man and animal (W. Hamacher, Ed.; K. Attell, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Anderson, T., & Suominen Guyas, A. (2012). Earth education, interbeing, and deep ecology. Studies in Art Education, 53(3), 223–245. doi:10.1080/00393541.2012.11518865
  • Badmington, N. (Ed.). (2000). Posthumanism. New York, NY: St. Martin‘s Press.
  • Baker, S. (2003). Sloughing the human. In C. Wolfe (Ed.), Zoontologies: The question of the animal (pp. 147–164). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ballengee-Morris, C., & Stuhr, P. L. (2001). Multicultural art and visual cultural education in a changing world. Art Education, 54(4), 6–13. doi:10.2307/3193897
  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
  • Biesta, G. (2017). Letting art teach: Art education “after” Joseph Beuys. Arnhem, The Netherlands: ArtEZ Press.
  • Blandy, D. (2011). Sustainability, participatory culture, and the performance of democracy: Ascendant sites of theory and practice in art education. Studies in Art Education, 52(3), 243–255. doi:10.1080/00393541.2011.11518838
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
  • Burns, J. H., & Hart, H. L. A. (Eds.). (1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Daniel, V. (1996). Womanist influences on curricular ecology. In G. Collins & R. Sandell (Eds.), Gender issues in art education: Content, contexts and strategies (pp. 78–88). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
  • Derby, J. (2011). Disability studies and art education. Studies in Art Education, 52(2), 94–111.
  • Derby, J. (2015, March). Animal rights, art, and art education. Paper presented at the 55th Annual National Art Education Association Convention, New Orleans, LA.
  • Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
  • Derrida, J., & Nancy, J.-L. (1991). “Eating well,” or the calculation of the subject: An interview with Jacques Derrida. In E. Cadava, P. Connor, & J.-L. Nancy (Eds.), Who comes after the subject? (pp. 96–119). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanity Press.
  • Erzen, J. (2005). An ecological approach to art education: Environmental aesthetics. International Journal of Education Through Art, 1(2), 179–186. doi:10.1386/etar.1.2.179/1
  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York, NY: Pantheon.
  • Garber, E. (1990). Implications of feminist art criticism for art education. Studies in Art Education, 32(1), 17–26. doi:10.2307/1320396
  • Garber, E. (2019). Objects and new materialisms: A journey across making and living with objects. Studies in Art Education, 60(1), 7–21. doi:10.1080/00393541.2018.1557454
  • Garoian, C. R. (1999). Performing pedagogy: Toward an art of politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Garoian, C. R., & Gaudelius, Y. M. (2001). Cyborg pedagogy: Performing resistance in the digital age. Studies in Art Education, 42(4), 333–347. doi:10.2307/1321078
  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. London, England: Bloomsbury.
  • Hicks, L. (1991). The politics of difference in feminism and multicultural art education. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research in Art Education, 9, 11–26.
  • Hicks, L. E., & King, R. J. H. (2007). Confronting environmental collapse: Visual culture, art education, and environmental responsibility. Studies in Art Education, 48(4), 332–335. doi:10.1080/00393541.2007.11650111
  • Illeris, H. (2015). Searching for environmental sustainability: Art education for sustainable development (AESD) in Nordic art education. In M. Kallio-Tavin & J. Pullinen (Eds.), Conversations on Finnish art education (pp. 278–291). Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University.
  • jagodzinski, j. (2013). Art and its education in the Anthropocene: The need for an avant-garde without authority. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 1(10), 31–34. doi:10.1080/15505170.2013.790000
  • jagodzinski, j. (2014). Life in art | Art in life: Bioart ethics within the Anthropocene. Synnyt/Origins: Finnish Studies in Art Education, 3, 13–25. Retrieved from https://researtsedu.com/2014-december-issue
  • Jokela, T. (2013). Engaged art in the north: Aims, methods, contexts. In T. Jokela, G. Coutts, M. Huhmarniemi, & E. Härkönen (Eds.), Cool: Applied visual arts in the north (pp. 10–21). Rovaniemi, Finland: University of Lapland.
  • Kallio-Tavin, M. (2019). Killing them softly: Nonhuman animal relationships and limitations of ethics. In K. Tavin, M. Kallio-Tavin, & M. Ryynänen (Eds.), Art, excess, and education: Historical and discursive contexts (pp. 79–91). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Keifer-Boyd, K. (2003). A pedagogy to expose and critique gendered cultural stereotypes embedded in art interpretations. Studies in Art Education, 44(4), 315–344. doi:10.1080/00393541.2003.11651748
  • Keifer-Boyd, K., Knochel, A. D., Patton, R. M., & Sweeny, R. W. (2018). Posthumanist movement art pedagogy: Geolocative awareness and co-figurative agency with mobile learning. Studies in Art Education, 59(1), 22–38. doi:10.1080/00393541.2017.1406227
  • Lanier, V. (1969). The teaching of art as social revolution. Phi Delta Kappan, 50(6), 314–319.
  • Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (2005). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Levinas, E. (2008). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press (Original work published 1969).
  • Levinas, E. (2009). Ethics and infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo (R. A. Cohen, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. (Original work published 1985)
  • Lewis, T. E., & Kahn, R. (2020). Education out of bounds: Reimagining cultural studies for a posthuman age. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lostedt, M. (2020). Perttu Saksa’s work on our relationship with the environment. Retrieved from www.perttusaksa.com/text1
  • Lummaa, K., & Rojola, L. (Eds.). (2014). Posthumanismi. Turku, Finland: Eetos.
  • McFee, J. K. (1966). Society, art, and education. In E. Mattil (Ed.), A seminar in art education for research and curriculum development (pp. 122–140). University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (2003). Foreword: The rights of things. In C. Wolfe (Ed.), Animal rites: American culture, the discourse of species, and posthumanist theory (pp. ix–xiv). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • O’Donoghue, D. (2009). Are we asking the wrong questions in arts-based research? Studies in Art Education, 50(4), 352–368. doi:10.1080/00393541.2009.11518781
  • Ryder, R. D. (1975). Victims of science: The use of animals in research. London, UK: Davis-Poynter.
  • Saksa, P. (2020). The presence of the photograph—Human and animal. Retrieved from www.perttusaksa.com/text3
  • Sandell, R. (1991). The liberating relevance of feminist pedagogy. Studies in Art Education, 32(3), 178–187. doi:10.2307/1320688
  • Schulte, C. M. (2019). Wild encounters: A more-than-human approach to children’s drawing. Studies in Art Education, 60(2), 92–102. doi:10.1080/00393541.2019.1600223
  • Sederholm, H. (2014). Biological art and education. Synnyt/Origins: Finnish Studies in Art Education, 3, i–ii. Retrieved from https://researtsedu.com/2014-december-issue
  • Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: New York Review of Books.
  • Stuhr, P. (1995). Social reconstructionist multicultural art curriculum design: Using the Powpow as an example. In R. W. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content and community in art education: Beyond postmodernism (pp. 193–221). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Suominen, A., & Kallio-Tavin, M. (2017, December). Animals in contemporary society, art, and education: Iconic, cute, partners, food, trade, disposable. Paper presented at the Art, EcoJustice, and Education Conference, Tampere, Finland.
  • Tavin, K., & Kallio-Tavin, M. (2014). The cat, the cradle, and the silver spoon: Violence in contemporary art and the question of ethics for art education. Studies in Art Education, 56(1), 424–437. doi:10.1080/00393541.2014.11518950
  • Teittinen, J. (2014). Mikä ihmiselle kuuluu: Humanismi, kysymys eläimestä ja kärsivien piiri. In K. Lummaa & L. Rojola (Eds.), Posthumanismi (pp. 155–178). Turku, Finland: Eetos.
  • Wadiwel, D. (2015). The war against animals. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
  • Wallace, V. (2020). The monkey and the mask. [Reprint of Time review]. Retrieved from www.perttusaksa.com/text2
  • Wolfe, C. (2003). Animal rites: American culture, the discourse of species, and posthumanist theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.