Critical and Creative Thinking as a Form of Making in Art Education

References

• Ab Kadir, M. A. (2018). An inquiry into critical thinking in the Australian curriculum: Examining its conceptual understandings and their implications on developing critical thinking as a “general capability” on teachers’ practice and knowledge. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1535424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. (2013). The artful dodger: Creative resistance to neoliberalism in education. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 35(4), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2013.819726
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Policy pathways for twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 293–310). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_15
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. L., & Freeman, N. H. (2020). Children readily think about people’s minds when they think about artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 38(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237419868957
   Google Scholar
• Alter, F. A. (2011). Exploring visual arts pedagogies that support critical and creative thinking. Australian Art Education, 34(1), 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (n.d.-a). Critical and creative thinking. https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/general-capabilities/critical-and-creative-thinking?element=1&sub-element=0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (n.d.-b). Understand this general capability: Critical and creative thinking. https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/teacher-resources/understand-this-general-capability/critical-and-creative-thinking
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2023). The Australian curriculum. Retrieved January 20, 2023, from https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailin, S. (1987). Critical and creative thinking. Informal Logic, 9(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v9i1.2656
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. C. M. (2017a). Constraints on art in education: Realism and art education. In Studies in philosophical realism in art, design and education (pp. 17–23). Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N. C. M. (2017b). Studies in philosophical realism in art, design and education. Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2018). Through growth to achievement: The report of the Review to Achieve Educational Excellence in Australian schools. https://www.education.gov.au/quality-schools-package/resources/through-growth-achievement-report-review-achieve-educational-excellence-australian-schools
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, A., & Jeffrey, B. (2008). Creativity and performativity in teaching and learning: Tensions, dilemmas, constraints, accommodations and synthesis. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802223842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. (2019). Learning progressions: Framing and designing coherent sequences for STEM education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0005-x
   Google Scholar
• Engel, L. C., Rutkowski, D., & Thompson, G. (2019). Toward an international measure of global competence? A critical look at the PISA 2018 framework. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1642183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, C. F. (1987). Thought from language: The linguistic construction of cognitive representations. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world (pp. 131–146). Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, N. H. (2004). Aesthetic judgment and reasoning. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 359–378). Laurence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, N. H., & Parsons, M. J. (2001). Children’s intuitive understandings of pictures. In B. Torff & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Understanding and teaching the intuitive mind: Students and teacher learning (pp. 73–92). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, R. (2019). General capabilities in the Australian curriculum: Promise, problems and prospects. Curriculum Perspectives, 39, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-019-00079-z
   Google Scholar
• Greenlaw, J. (2015). Deconstructing the metanarrative of the 21st century skills movement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(9), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1035156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffen, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2011). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, D. (2020). Cross-curriculum priorities in the Australian curriculum: Stirring the passions and a work in progress? Curriculum Perspectives, 40, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-020-00121-5
   Google Scholar
• Maras, K. E. (2008). Mapping children’s theory of critical meaning in visual arts [Doctoral Dissertation, University of New South Wales]. UNSW Sydney Library. https://www.unsworks.unsw.edu.au/permalink/f/a5fmj0/unsworks_1786
   Google Scholar
• Maras, K. (2010). Age-related shifts in the theoretical constraints underlying children’s critical reasoning in art. Australian Art Education, 33(1), 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Maras, K. E. (2018a). Mind, language and artworks as real constraints on students’ critical reasoning about meaning in art. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12152
   Google Scholar
• Maras, K. (2018b). A realist account of critical agency in art criticism in art and design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(4), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maras, K. (2019). Reconciling critical and creative thinking capabilities and critical practice in Visual Arts education: A work in progress. Australian Art Education, 40(2), 262–276.
   Google Scholar
• Maras, K. (2021). Ahead of its time? Reassessing what is core content in visual arts in the New South Wales Curriculum. Curriculum Perspectives, 41, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00136-6
   Google Scholar
• National Advocates for the Arts in Education. (2019, September 18). Educators call for a status review of Australian arts curriculum implementation [Press release]. https://naae.org.au/news/ educators-call-for-a-status-review-of-australian-arts-curriculum-implementation
   Google Scholar
• Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W. (1993). The logic of creative and critical thinking. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764293037001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Programme for International Student Assessment. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2010). “21st-century” skills: Not new, but a worthy challenge. American Educator, 34(1), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C., & O’Connor, K. (2015). National agendas in global times: Curriculum reforms in Australia and the USA since the 1980s. journal of education policy, 30(5), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.969321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2008). Social ontology: Some basic principles (with a new addendum by the author). In Philosophy in a new century: Selected essays (pp. 26–52). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skourdoumbis, A. (2016). Articulations of teaching practice: A case study of teachers and “general capabilities.” Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9460-7
   Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V. (2009). On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of “structure of matter.” International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802578025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R. (2012). Group reasons. Philosophical Issues, 22(1), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2012.00237.x
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. (2001). On aesthetics: A review and some revisions. Literature and Aesthetics, 11, 7–29.
   Google Scholar