The Social and Historic Construction of Professional Values in Conservation

References

• Oddy, A., (ed.), Restoration: Is It Acceptable?, British Museum Occasional Paper 99, British Museum, London (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Krumbein, W.E., Brimblecombe, P., Cosgrove, D.E., and Staniforth, S., (eds.), Durability and Change: The Science, Responsibility and Cost of Sustaining Cultural Heritage, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Dykstra, S.W., ‘The artist's intentions and the intentional fallacy in fine arts conservation’, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 35 (1996) 187–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code of Ethics and Guidance for Practice for Those Involved in the Conservation of Cultural Property in Canada, International Institute for Conservation—Canadian Group, Ottawa (1989) 18, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, S., Objects as systems: a new challenge for conservation' in Restoration: Is It Acceptable?, ed. A. Oddy, British Museum Occasional Paper 99, British Museum, London (1994) 19.
   Google Scholar
• Guidance for Conservation Practice, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, Dec. 1981 (report presented to membership).
   Google Scholar
• ‘The NZPCG Code of Ethics’ in New Zealand Directory of Conservators of Cultural Property, The New Zealand Professional Conservators Group Inc., Auckland (1991) 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Code of Ethics and Guidelines for Practice’ in Directory, American Institute for Conservation, Washington (1995) 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, I., personal communication (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Bomford, D., ‘Changing taste in the restoration of paintings’ in Restoration: Is It Acceptable?, ed. A. Oddy, British Museum Occasional Paper 99, British Museum (1994) 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hartin, D.D., ‘An historical introduction to conservation’ in Shared Responsibility: Proceedings of a Seminar for Curators and Conservators, ed. B.A. Ramsay-Jolicoeur and I.N.M. Wainwright, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa (1990) 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggles, M., ‘The history of conservation in Canada: developments to the early 1970's’, Journal of the International Institute for Conservation—Canadian Group 5 (1982) 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, E., Bernard Berenson: The Making of a Legend, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1987).
   Google Scholar
• ‘Picture restoration’, The Museums Journal, Sept. (1906) 114–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, M., ‘The Murray Pease Report: Standards of Practice and Professional Relationships for Conservators’, adopted by IIC-AG, June 8, 1963, and approved for legal sufficiency Aug. 7, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Leger, F., The Aesthetic of the Machine (1924), as quoted in H.B. Chipp, Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book by Artists and Critics, University of California Press, Berkeley (1968) 217.
   Google Scholar
• Caldararo, N.L., ‘An outline history of conservation in archaeology and anthropology as presented through its publications’, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 26 (1987) 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Hulmer, E., ‘The role of conservation on connoisseurship’, thesis, University of Pittsburgh (1955).
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, S., Museums, Objects and Collections: A Cultural Study, Leicester University Press, Leicester and London (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Staniforth, S., ‘Group Report: What are appropriate strategies to evaluate change and to sustain cultural heritage?’ in Durability and Change: The Science, Responsibility and Cost of Sustaining Cultural Heritage, ed. W.E. Krumbein, P. Brimblecombe, D.E. Cosgrove and S. Staniforth, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1994) 218.
   Google Scholar
• Corfield, M., ‘Towards a conservation profession’ in UKIC 30th Anniversary Conference, United Kingdom Institute for Conservation. London (1988) 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gilberg, M., ‘Frederich Rathgen: the father of modern archaeological conservation’, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 26 (1987) 106.
   Google Scholar
• ‘L'activité de l'Office International des Musées: Conclusions adoptées par la conférence internationale pour l'étude des méthodes scientifiques appliquées à l'examen et à la conservation des oeuvres d'art, Rome, 13–17 octobre, 1930’, Mouseion 13–14 (1930) 126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T.D., ‘The decay of stone antiquities’, The Museums Journal 10 (1910) 100–106.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Historical note’ in List of Members 1993–94, International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London (1993) 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Reports of the Annual Meetings of British Association for the Advancement of Science, John Murray, London.
   Google Scholar
• Brinch Madsen, H., ‘Artefact conservation in Denmark at the beginning of the last century’ in Recent Advances in the Conservation and Analysis of Artifacts, ed. J. Black, Summer Schools Press, London (1987) 343–345.
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs, A., Art Criticism from a Laboratory, George Allen and Unwin, London (1938) viii.
   Google Scholar
• Keyser, B.W., ‘Victorian chromatics’, PhD thesis, University of Toronto (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Copplestone, T., Modern Art, Deans International Publishing, London (1985) 11.
   Google Scholar
• Janson, H.W., History of Art: A Survey of the Major Visual Arts from the Dawn of History to the Present Day, Harry N. Abrams, Inc., and Prentice-Hall (New Jersey), New York (1962).
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, G., Museums and the First World War, Leicester University Press, London (1994) 31, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Caygill, M., The Story of the British Museum, British Museum Publications Ltd, London (1981).
   Google Scholar