The Icon Last Supper of the Iconostasis of the Russian Memorial Church in Leipzig: Technological Investigation as Basis for the Modelling and the Numerical Simulation of Historical Works of Art

References

• Aggeev, P. Y. 1886. “Technical Notes of Painting. Paints of Old Russian Iconographers.” Vestnik Izyaschnyh Iskussnv (Bulletin of Fine Arts) T 4 (6): 450–464.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley-Smith, J., A. Burmester, and M. Eibl, eds. 2013. Climate for Collections. Standards and Uncertainties. Munich: Archetype Publications Ltd and Doerner Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaduce, I., L. Carlyle, M. P. Colombini, C. Duce, C. Ferrari, E. Ribechini, P. Selleri, and M. R. Tiné. 2012. “New Insights Into the Ageing of Linseed Oil Paint Binder. A Qualitative and Quantitative Analytical Study.” PLoS One 7: e49333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, E., A. S. J. Suiker, and N. A. Fleck. 2020. “Crack Channeling Mechanisms in Brittle Coating Systems Under Moisture or Temperature Gradients.” International Journal of Fracture 225: 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, E., A. S. J. Suiker, and N. A. Fleck. 2021. “Moisture-Induced Cracking in a Flexural Bilayer with Application to Historical Paintings.” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 112: 102779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratasz, L. 2013. “Allowable Microclimatic Variations for Painted Wood.” Studies in Conservation 58: 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caudullo, G., E. Welk, and J. S. Ayanz. 2020. Chronological Data for the Main European Wood Species, Mendeley Data, V9. Euforgen 2020. European Forest Genetic Resources Programme. Accessed April 12, 2021. http://www.euforgen.org/species/tilia-cordata/.
   Google Scholar
• Christache, R., I. Sandu, A. Simionescu, V. Vasilache, A. Budu, and I. Sandu. 2015. “Multi-Analytical Study of the Paint Layers Used in Authentication of Icon from XIXth Century.” Revista de Chimie 66: 1034–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombini, M. P., F. Modugno, S. Giannarelli, R. Fuoco, and M. Matteini. 2000. “GC-MS Characterisation of Paint Varnishes.” Microchemical Journal 67: 385–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derzhavina, V. 2015. Die kulturelle Bedeutung der Russischen Gedächtniskirche zu Leipzig. Gedächtniskirche zur Russischen Ehre in Leipzig 1913-2013, 92–104. Beresta, St. Petersburg.
   Google Scholar
• Duin, P. V., and N. Kos. 2014. The Conservation of Panel Paintings and Related Objects. Den Haag: NWO.
   Google Scholar
• Durnovo, L. A. 1926. Old Russian Painting Technique. Materials of Techniques and Conservation Technologies. Leningrad: Russian Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Filatov, V. V. 1961. Russian Easel Tempera Painting. Techniques and Restoration. Moscow: Iskustvo.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrman, A., V. Hietschold, M. Eisbein, K. Püschner, and B. Weiß. 2019. “Extraktion ölgetränkter Holzobjekte.” VDR Beiträge 16: 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Grenberg, Y. I. 1971–1975. Sketches of the History of the Development of Technical and Technological Research of Paintings. Papers of the All-Russian Central Scientific-Research laboratory for Conservation and Restoration of Museum Art-works (VtsNILKR – Всероссийская центральная научноисследовательская лаборатория по консервации и реставрации музейных художественных ценностей), 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Grenberg, Y. I. 1976. Fundamentals of Museum Preservation and Research of Easel Artwork. Part 2: Primary Analytical Methods of Technical and Technological Research. Moscow: Iskusstvo.
   Google Scholar
• Гренберг, Ю. И. 2004. От фаюмского портрета до постимпрессионизма. История технологии станковой живописи: две тысячи лет эволюции. Москва: Искусство.
   Google Scholar
• Guryanov, V. P. 1906. Two Local Icons of the Holy Trinity in Holy Trinity Cathedral of the Holy Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra and Their Restoration. Moscow: Pechatnia A. I. Snegirevo.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, E., E. Quasney, and M. Mecklenburg. 2004. “A Parametric Analysis of Relative Humidity. Effects on Traditional Panel Paintings.” MRS Proceedings 852: OO2.8.
   Google Scholar
• Högy, T. 1978. Russische Ikonen. Gießen: Wilhelm Schmitz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• IIC. 2014. IIC – ICOM CC Declaration on Environmental Guidelines. International Institute of Conservation. Accessed April 12, 2021. https://www.iiconservation.org/node/5168.
   Google Scholar
• Jakieła, S., Ł Bratasz, and R. Kozłowski. 2008. “Numerical Modelling of Moisture Movement and Related Stress Field in Lime Wood Subjected to Changing Climate Conditions.” Wood Science and Technology 42: 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner, H. 1992. Vergolden. Das Arbeiten mit Blattgold. München: Callwey.
   Google Scholar
• Konopka, D., C. Gebhardt, and M. Kaliske. 2017. “Numerical Modelling of Wooden Structures.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 27S: 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Konopka, D., and M. Kaliske. 2018. “Virtual Experiments on Stringed Wooden Instruments. Influence of Mechanical and Climate Loading.” In Wooden Musical Instruments. Different Forms of Knowledge. Book of End of WoodMusICK COST Action FP1302, edited by M. A. Pérez and E. Marconi, 291–309. Paris: Cité de la Musique - Philharmonie de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Kupczak, A., M. Jędrychowski, M. Strojecki, L. Krzemień, Ł Bratasz, M. Łukomski, and R. Kozłowski. 2018. “A Web-Based Decision-Supporting Tool for Assessing Risk of Physical Damage Using Various Failure Criteria.” Studies in Conservation 63: 151–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luimes, R. A., and A. S. J. Suiker. 2021. “Numerical Modelling of Climate-Induced Fracture and Deformation in Wood: Application to Historical Museum Objects.” International Journal of Solids and Structures 210–211: 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luimes, R. A., A. S. J. Suiker, A. J. M. Jorissen, P. H. J. C. van Duin, and H. L. Schellen. 2018. “Hygro-mechanical Response of Oak Cabinet Door Panels Under Relative Humidity Fluctuations.” Heritage Science 6: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łukomski, M., M. Strojecki, B. Pretzel, N. Blades, V. L. Beltran, and A. Freeman. 2017. “Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Micro-Damage in Wooden art Objects to Assess Climate Management Strategies.” Insight 59: 256–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecklenburg, M. F., C. S. Tumosa, and D. Erhardt. 1998. “Structural Response of Painted Wood Surfaces to Changes in Ambient Relative Humidity.” In Painted Wood. History and Conservation, edited by V. Dorge and F. C. Howlett, 464–483. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Michalski, S. 2009. “The Ideal Climate, Risk Management, the ASHRAE Chapter, Proofed Fluctuations, and Towards a Full Risk Analysis Model.” In Proceedings of Experts’ Roundtable on Sustainable Climate Management Strategies, Tenerife 2007, edited by F. Boersma. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute. Accessed April 12, 2021. https://www.getty.edu/conservation/our_projects/science/climate/climate_experts_roundtable.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. S., and R. White. 1994. The Organic Chemistry of Museum Objects. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Naumova, M. M. 2018. Late Antiquity – The Middle Ages – The Renaissance – Painting Materials and Techniques. A Collection of Articles and Statements. Moscow: Indrik.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaus, K., and C. Westphal. 1999. The Restauration of Paintings. Köln: Könemann Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Niemz, P., and W. Sonderegger. 2017. Holzphysik. Physik des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe. München: Hanser-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Onasch, K. 1961. Ikonen. Berlin: Union.
   Google Scholar
• Onasch, K. 1968. Die Ikonenmalerei. Grundzüge einer systematischen Darstellung. Leipzig: Köhler & Amelang.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, R., and P. Niemz. 2009. “Wasserdampfsorptionsverhalten ausgewählter heimischer und überseeischer Holzarten.” Bauphysik 31: 117–121.
   Google Scholar
• Rachwał, B., Ł Bratasz, M. Łukomski, and R. Kozłowski. 2012. “Response of Wood Supports in Panel Paintings Subjected to Changing Climate Conditions.” Strain 48: 366–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandu, I., S. Bracci, I. Sandu, and M. Lobefaro. 2009. “Integrated Analytical Study for the Authentication of Five Russian Icons (XVI–XVII Centuries).” Microscopy Research and Technique 72: 755–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandu, I., A. Roque, P. Matteini, S. Schäfer, G. Agati, C. Correia, and J. Viana. 2012. “Fluorescence Recognition of Proteinaceous Binders in Works of Art by a Novel Integrated System of Investigation.” Microscopy Research and Technique 75: 316–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Шнейдер, ИВ, and ПА Федоров. 2002. Техника иконописи. Руководство к практическому изучению писания православных икон по приемам первых иконописцев. В: Вздорнов Г. И., Залесская З. Е., Лелекова О. В.: <Общество «Икона» в Париже. Т. 2., Прогресс-Традиция, Москва, 241–280.
   Google Scholar
• Schüppel, H. 1956. Brief des Beauftragten des Institutes für Denkmalpflege des Rates der Stadt Leipzig an das Institut für Denkmalpflege Dresden 16.08.1956. Akte zur Russischen Gedächtniskirche Leipzig im Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Sachsen.
   Google Scholar
• Schweinfurth, P. 1930. Geschichte der Russischen Malerei im Mittelalter. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Shchavinsky, V. A. 1935. “Essays on the History of Painting Techniques and Paint Technique in Ancient Russia.” In News of the State Academy of the History of Material Culture, 115. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe isdatelstvo (State Social-Economical Publishing House).
   Google Scholar
• Spannagel, F. 1954. Der Möbelbau. Ein Fachbuch für Tischler, Architekten, Lehrer und Liebhaber. Ravensburg: Otto Maier.
   Google Scholar
• Stratis, J. A., C. Makarona, D. Lazidou, E. G. Sánchez, A. Koutsoudis, M. Pamplona, R. Pauswein, G. Pavlidis, S. Simon, and N. Tsirliganis. 2014. “Enhancing the Examination Workflow for Byzantine Icons: Implementation of Information Technology Tools in a Traditional Context.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 15: 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantideeravit, S., M. N. Charalambides, D. S. Balint, and C. R. T. Young. 2013. “Prediction of Delamination in Multilayer Artist Paints Under low Amplitude Fatigue Loading.” Engineering Fracture Mechanics 112–113: 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissmann, G. 2012. Techniques of Traditional Icon Painting. Tunbridge Wells: Search Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. D., C. Gauvin, C. R. Young, A. C. Taylor, D. S. Balint, and M. N. Charalambides. 2018. “Cracking in Paintings due to Relative Humidity Cycles.” Procedia Structural Integrity 13: 379–384.
   Google Scholar
• Yakovleva, A. I. 1987. Techniques of Old Russian Painting (Pre-Mongolian Period). Dissertation at All-Union Scientific-Research Institute of Arts. Moscow.
   Google Scholar