Authenticity and Originality, Objectivity and Subjectivity in Conservation Decision-making – or is it Just a Matter of Taste?

References

• Andrew, C. 1992. Stone Cleaning and the Nature, Soiling and Decay Mechanisms of Stone, 63–81. Edinburgh and Aberdeen: Historic Scotland and The Robert Gordon Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley-Smith, J. 2017. “A Role for Bespoke Codes of Ethics.” In ICOM Committee for Conservation 18th Triennial Meeting Copenhagen Preprints, edited by J. Bridgland, 1901–1904. Paris: ICOM. https://www.icom-cc-publications-online.org/1742/A-role-for-bespoke-codes-of-ethics.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley-Smith, J. 2018. “The Ethics of Doing Nothing.” Journal of the Institute of Conservation 41: 6–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berns, R. S. 2002. “Multiple Pigment Selection for Inpainting Using Visible Reflectance Spectrophotometry.” Studies in Conservation 47: 46–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berns, R. S. 2016. Color Science and the Visual Arts. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. M. 2014. “Indisputable Authenticity’: Engaging with the Real in the Museum.” In Authenticity and Replication: The ‘Real Thing’ in Art and Conservation, edited by R. Gordon, E. Hermens, and F. Lennard, 3–10. London: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Burmester, A., J. Cupitt, H. Derrien, N. Dessipris, A. Hamber, K. Martinez, M. Müller, and D. Saunders. 1992. “The Examination of Paintings: Digital Image Analysis.” In Third International Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Microanalytical Methods and Environmental Evaluation for Study and Conservation of Works of Art, 201–214. Viterbo: BetaGamma.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary online. 2020 [accessed 20 July 2020]. Available at < https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/original>.
   Google Scholar
• Cuellar, S., J. Stenger, R. Gschwind, A. Mohan, Y. Mukaigawa, R. Raskar, K. Eremin, and N. Khandekar. 2011. “Non-invasive Color Restoration of Faded Paintings Using Light from a Digital Projector.” In ICOM Committee for Conservation 16th Triennial Meeting Lisbon Preprints, edited by J. Bridgland. Paris: ICOM. https://www.icom-cc-publications-online.org/1251/Non-Invasive-Color-Restoration-of-Faded-Paintings-Using-Light-from-a-Digital-Projector.
   Google Scholar
• Dykstra, S. W. 1996. “The Artist’s Intentions and the Intentional Fallacy in Fine Arts Conservation.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 35: 197–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. 2016. “Freeze-framing Territory: Time and its Significance in Land Governance.” Space & Polity 20: 212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage, J. 1993. Color and Culture – Practice and Meaning from Antiquity to Abstraction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giombini, L. 2017. Musical Ontology – A Guide for the Perplexed. Milan: Mimesis International.
   Google Scholar
• Hummelen, Y., M. M. Versteegh, and V. van Saaze. 2008. “Towards a Symmetrical Approach in Conservation?” In ICOM Committee for Conservation 15th Triennial Meeting, edited by J. Bridgland, 1041–1047. Paris: ICOM. https://www.icom-cc-publications-online.org/1982/Towards-a-symmetrical-approach-in-conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. 2015. “Mark Rothko’s Harvard Murals”, caa.reviews, 14 May 2015. [accessed 20 July 2020]. Available at &lt; http://www.caareviews.org/reviews/2675>.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, S. 1984. “Some Picture Cleaning Controversies: Past and Present.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 23: 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Korsmeyer, C. 2019. Things: In Touch with the Past. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. 1995. “Colour in Language.” In Colour Art and Science, edited by R. Lamb, and J. Bourriau, 194–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menand, L. 2015. “Watching Them Turn off the Rothkos”, The New Yorker, 1 April 2015. [accessed 20 July 2020]. Available at &lt; https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/watching-them-turn-off-the-rothkos>.
   Google Scholar
• Morena, J. 2014. ““Definitions of Authenticity: a Study of the Relationship Between the Reproduction and Original Gone with the Wind Costumes at the Harry Ransom Center”.” In Authenticity and Replication: The ‘Real Thing’ in Art and Conservation, edited by R. Gordon, E. Hermens, and F. Lennard, 119–130. London: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Viñas, S. 2005. Contemporary Theory of Conservation, 93. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Viñas, S. 2009. “Beyond Authenticity.” In Art Conservation and Authenticities: Material, Concept, Context, edited by E. Hermens, and T. Fiske, 33–38. London: Archetype Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. 2020 [accessed 27 July 2020]. Available at: &lt;https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/authentic>.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D., J. Cupitt, C. White, and S. Holt. 2002. “The MARC II Camera and the Scanning Initiative at the National Gallery.” National Gallery Technical Bulletin 23: 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J. 1975. The Random House College Dictionary, rev. edn. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Vernallis, K. 1999. “The Loss of Meaning in Faded Color Photographs.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 38: 459–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. 2008. “Why There are no ‘Colour Universals’ in Language and Thought.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14: 407–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer, J., N. Witthoft, M. C. Frank, L. Wu, A. R. Wade, and L. Boroditsky. 2007. “Russian Blues Reveal Effects of Language on Color Discrimination.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 7780–7785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar