Assessment of land ownership fragmentation by multiple criteria

References

• Bentley, J.W., 1987. Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: In defence of a much-maligned phenomenon. Annual review of anthropology, 16 (8), 31–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.000335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, R., and Clark, W.A.V., 1964. The concept of shape in geography. Geographical review, 54, 561–572. doi: 10.2307/212982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crecente, R., Alvarez, C., and Fra, U., 2002. Economic, social and environmental impact of land consolidation in Galicia. Land use policy, 19 (2), 135–147. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., 1961. Report on an economic study of small farming in Jamaica. Kingston: Institute of Social and Economic Research, University College of the West Indies.
   Google Scholar
• Glowacka, A., Janus, J., and Bożek, P., 2016. Non-urban area ownership structure. Case study of Southern Poland. Geodesy and cartography, 65 (2), 219–228. doi: 10.1515/geocart-2016-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, X.P., Alvarez, C.J., and Crecente, R., 2004. Evaluation of land distributions with joint regard to plot size and shape. Agricultural systems, 82 (1), 31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2003.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harasimowicz, S., et al., 2017. Shape and size of parcels and transport costs as a mixed integer programming problem in optimization of land consolidation. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 140, 113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartvigsen, M., 2016. Land consolidation in central and Eastern Europe – integration with local rural development needs. In: 2016 World Bank conference on land and poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hušek, R., and Maňas, M., 1989. Mathematical models in economics (in Czech). Prague: State Pedagogical Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Igbozurike, M.U., 1974. Land tenure relations, social relations and the analysis of spatial discontinuity. Area, 6 (2), 132–136.
   Google Scholar
• Janus, J., et al., 2016. A new approach to calculate the land fragmentation indicators taking into account the adjacent plots. Survey review, 1–7. doi:10.1080/00396265.2016.1210362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Januszewski, J., 1968. Index of land consolidation as a criterion of the degree of concentration. Geographia polonica, 14, 291–296.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., and Tamiz, M., 2010. Practical goal programming. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kadigi, R.M.J., et al., 2017. Land fragmentation, agricultural productivity and implications for agricultural investments in the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) region, Tanzania. Journal of development and agricultural economics, 9 (2), 26–36. doi: 10.5897/JDAE2016.0797
   Google Scholar
• King, R., and Burton, S., 1982. Land fragmentation: notes on a fundamental rural spatial problem. Progress in human geography, 6 (4), 475–494. doi: 10.1177/030913258200600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konc, Ľ, 2012. Determination of the value of plots in land consolidation using multicriteria approach (in Slovak). Thesis (PhD). The Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.
   Google Scholar
• Krummel, J.R., et al., 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos, 48 (3), 321–324. doi: 10.2307/3565520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., and Marks, B.J., 1994. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscapes structure. Corvallis: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, B.T., 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. Ecological studies, 82, 199–235. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4244-2_9
   Google Scholar
• Muchová, Z., and Jusková, K., 2017. Stakeholdeŕs perception of defragmentation of new plots in a land consolidation project: Given the surprisingly different Slovak and Czech approaches. Land use policy, 66 (5), 356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munton, R., 2009. Rural land ownership in the United Kingdom: Changing patterns and future possibilities for land use. Land use policy, 26, 54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, R.V., et al., 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape ecology, 1 (3), 153–162. doi: 10.1007/BF00162741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitel, J., 1990. Multicriterion optimization and its utilization in agriculture. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge, D., 2003. Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: can pattern reflect process ? DOC Science Internal Series 98 Wellington: Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Schmook, G.J., 1976. The spontaneous evolution from farming on scattered strips to farming in severalty in Flanders between the sixteenth and twentieth century’s: A quantitative approach to the study of farm fragmentation. In: R.H. Buchanan, R.A. Butlin, and D. McCourt, ed. Fields, farms and settlement in Europe. Belfast: Ulster Folk and Transport Museum, 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A.J., 1964. An index of farm structure with a Nottinghamshire example. East midland geographer, 5 (3), 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T., 2003. Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation. Land use policy, 20 (2), 149–158. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00082-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vranken, L., Noev, N., and Swinnen, J.F.M., 2004. Fragmentation, abandonment, and co-ownership: Transition problems of the Bulgarian land market. Quarterly journal of international agriculture, 43 (4), 391–408.
   Google Scholar