Design and development 3D RRR model for Turkish cadastral system using international standards

References

• Aien, A., et al., 2011. Aspects of 3D cadastre – a case study in Victoria. In: Proceedings FIG working week 2011 (15 p.), Marrakech.
   Google Scholar
• Aien, A., 2013. 3D cadastral data modelling. Thesis (PhD). Melbourne University, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Akıncı, H. and Cömert, C., 2009. TUCBS and INSPIRE technical architecture, 12. Turkey Scientific and Technical Conference 11–15 May 2009, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Alkan, M., 2005. Temporal geographic information systems design for land registry and cadastral data. Thesis (PhD). Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon.
   Google Scholar
• Alkan, M., Gursoy Surmeneli, H., and Polat, Z.A., 2018. Design and determine cadastral and land management performance of Turkey with cadastre 2034 vision. XXVI FIG Congress, Istanbul, Türkıye, 6–11 Mayıs 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Alkan, M. and Polat, Z.A., 2017. Design and development of LADM-based infrastructure for Turkey. Survey review, 49 (356), 370–385. doi: 10.1080/00396265.2016.1180777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayazlı, E., 2006. 3D cadastre. Master Thesis. Yildiz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın, C.C., 2008. Usage of underground space for 3D cadastre purposes and related problems in Turkey. Sensors, 8, 6972–6983. doi:10.3390/s8116972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydınoglu, A.Ç., 2007. ISO / TC211-geographical information standards. TMMOB Geographical information systems congress, 2007 Proceedings, 30 October – 02 November 2007, KTU, Trabzon.
   Google Scholar
• Aydınoglu, A.Ç., 2010. Standard concept in geographical data management. Third remote sensing and geographical information systems symposium, Gebze, 11–13 October.
   Google Scholar
• Aydınoglu, A.Ç. and Bovkir, R., 2017. Generic land registry and cadastre data model supporting interoperability based on international standards for Turkey. Land use policy, 68, 59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydınoglu, A.Ç. and Inan, H.I., 2014. Developing land registry and cadastre base data model for land management applications. FIG Congress 2014, 16–21 June 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Aydınoglu, A.Ç. and Yomralıoğlu, T., 2010. A harmonised GI model for urban governance. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers – municipal engineer, 163 (2), 65–76. doi: 10.1680/muen.2010.163.2.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÇŞB, 2012. Turkey’s national geographic information system determination standard project: TUCBS conceptual model components, T. C. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization General Directorate of Geographical Information Systems. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/csb/dokumanlar/cbs0008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Benhamu, M. and Doytsher, Y., 2003. Toward a spatial 3D cadastre in Israel. Computers, environment and urban systems, 27, 359–374. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00036-4
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, C., 2015. 3D cadastre and importance of economic. The World Cadastre Summit- Congress & Exhibition Istanbul, Turkey, 20–25 April 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Coruhlu, Y.E., et al., 2015. Geographic data model of foundation immovable. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Science, 33 (4), 539–559.
   Google Scholar
• Coruhlu, Y.E., et al., 2016. The relation between structured cultural heritages and condominium towards 3D cadastre. Survey review, 48 (351), 438–449. doi:10.1179/1752270615Y.0000000045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döner, F., et al., 2010. 4D cadastres: first analysis of legal, organizational, and technical impact – with a case study on utility networks. Land use policy, 27, 1068–1081. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döner, F., et al., 2011. Solutions for 4D cadastre – with a case study on utility networks. International journal of geographical information science, 25 (7), 1173–1189. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2010.520272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döner, F. and Bıyık, C., 2007. Defining 2D parcels in 3D space by using elevation data. FIG Working Week 2007 Hong Kong SAR, China, 13–17 May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Döner, F. and Bıyık, C., 2013. Conformity of LADM for modeling 3D/4D cadastre situations in Turkey. 5th Land Administration Domain Model Workshop 24–25 September 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Ekin, E. and Cabuk, A., 2011. GIS based service management with OGC facilities: intelligent infrastructure. Sixth International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), Elazığ.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, G. and Jansson, L., 2010. Strata titles are introduced in Sweden. In: Proceedings XXIV international FIG congress (13 p.), Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• European Community (EC), 2007. Directive 2007/2/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 14 March 2007 establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the European community (INSPIRE).
   Google Scholar
• FIG, 1995. FIG statement on the cadastre. FIG Publish No: 11.
   Google Scholar
• GDLRC, 2015. www.tkgm.gov.tr.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, R., et al., 2011. A multi-jurisdiction case study of 3D cadastre in Shenzhen, China as experiment using the LADM. In: Proceedings 2nd international workshop on 3D Cadastres, pp. 31–50, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Gursoy Surmeneli, H. and Alkan, M., 2018. Design and determine 3D cadastral systems: a case study of Turkey. In: 6th International FIG 3D Cadastre Workshop, Delth, HOLLANDA, 2–4 Ekim 2018, pp. 447–464.
   Google Scholar
• Herdlevær, H., 2018. Cadastral template. Norwegian Mapping and Cadaster Authority Director Cadastral Department.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC211, 2012. ISO/TC 211 geographic information – land administration domain model (LADM). ISO/FDIS 19152 (final draft international standard ).
   Google Scholar
• Karki, S., McDougall, K., and Thompson, R., 2010. An overview of 3D cadastre from a physical land parcel and a legal property object perspective. In: Proceedings XXIV international FIG congress (13 p.), Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Kitsakis, D., et al., 2016. 3D real property legal concepts and cadastre – a comparative study of selected countries to propose a way forward. In: v. Oosterom, P., Dimopoulou, E., Fendel, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of 5th International FIG 3D Cadastre Workshop, 18–20 October 2016, Athens, Greece, pp. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C., et al., 2009. Transforming the land administration domain model (LADM) into an ISO standard (ISO19152). FIG working week, Eilat, Israel. http://www.gdmc.nl/publications/2009/LADM_to_ISO_Standard.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C.H.J., et al., 2011. Interoperable domain models: The ISO land administration domain model LADM and its external classes. UDMS 2011, Delft, The Netherlands, 28–30 September 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C.H.J. and Van Oosterom, P.J.M., 2013. The land administration domain model standard. 5th land administration domain model workshop. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 24–25 September 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C., Van Oosterom, P., and Bennett, R., 2015. The land administration domain model. Land use policy, 49, 535–545. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mataracı, O., Yomralıoğlu, T., and Cete, M., 2009. Scope of Assessment in the EU INSPIRE Directive of the Cadastral Parcels and Turkey’s position. TMMOM surveying and cadastre engineers, 12th turkey scientific and technical conference, 11–15 May, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• NEN, 2005. NEN 3610: basic model for geo-information – terms, definitions, relations and general rules for the interchange of information of spatial objects related to the earth's surface, NEN Standart Committee Geographic Information, ICS 01.040.93; 91.020.
   Google Scholar
• OGC, 2012. OpenGIS_ City geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard, version 2.0. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/citygml.
   Google Scholar
• Onsrud, H., 2003. Making a cadastre law for 3D properties in Norway. Computers, environment and urban systems, 27, 375–382. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00037-6
   Google Scholar
• Özçelik, A., 2013. Developing spatial data model for speciality agricultural crop lands: Case study on tea agriculture. Thesis (PhD). Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, Trabzon.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, R., 2007. New approaches in 3D cadastre (Master Thesis). Yildiz Technical University Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Paasch, J.M., et al., 2013. Specialization of the Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) – an option for expanding the legal profiles. FIG Working Week, Abuja, Nigeria, 6–10 May.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson, J., 2007. 3D property rights – an analysis of key factors based on international experience. Thesis (PhD). Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, 351 p.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson, J. and Paasch, J., 2013. 3D property research from a legal perspective. Computers, environment and urban systems, 40 (2), 7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, Z.A. and Alkan, M., 2018. Design and implementation of a LADM-based external archive data model for land registry and cadastre transactions in Turkey: a case study of municipality. Land use policy, 77, 249–266. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, Z.A., Alkan, M., and Gursoy Surmeneli, H., 2017. Determining strategies for the cadastre 2034 vision using an AHP-based SWOT analysis: a case study for the Turkish cadastral and land administration system. Land use policy, 67, 151–166. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, J., et al., 2010. 3D cadastre in the province of Quebec: a first experiment for the construction of a volumetric representation. In: Proceedings 5th international 3D GeoInfo conference (15 p.), Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Psomadaki, S., Dimopoulou, E., and van Oosterom, P., 2016. Model driven architecture engineered land administration in conformance with international standards – illustrated with the hellenic cadastre. Open geospatial data, software and standards, 1, 3. doi:10.1186/s40965-016-0002-3.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, A.A., Hua, T.C., and Van Oosterom, P. 2011. Embedding 3D into multipurpose Cadastre, In: Proceedings FIG working week (20 p.), Marrakech.
   Google Scholar
• Rajabifard, A., 2014. 3D cadastres and beyond. In: 4th international workshop on 3D Cadastres 9–11 November 2014, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
   Google Scholar
• Sladić, D., et al., 2014. The use of ontologies in cadastral systems, ICIST 2014 – Vol. 1 Regular papers, 256–261.
   Google Scholar
• Steudler, D., 2004. A framework for the evaluation of land administration systems. Thesis (PhD). The University of Melbourne, Department of Geomatics, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Steudler, D., 2015. Dimension cadastre – stepping beyond limits. FIG working Week from the Wisdom of the Ages to the Challenges of the Modern World, Sofia, 17–21 May, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Stoter, J.E., 2002. Uml modelling: from a 2D to a 3D cadastre. In: Presented at the 3rd international workshop: ‘Towards a cadastral core domanin model’ of COST action c9, Modelling Real Property Transactions, Delft, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Stoter, J.E., 2004. 3D cadastre (PhD thesis). TU Delft, Publications on Geodesy 57, Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft, 327 p.
   Google Scholar
• Stoter, J.E. and Ploeger, H.D., 2003. Property in 3D—registration of multiple use of space: current practice in Holland and the need for a 3D cadastre. Computers, environment and urban systems, 27, 553–570. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00014-0
   Google Scholar
• Stoter, J.E. and Salzmann, M.E., 2003. Where do cadastral needs and technical possibilities meet? In: P.J.M. van Oosterom and C.H.J. Lemmen, eds. Cadastral systems III, 3D cadastre. Computers, environment and urban systems (CEUS), July 2003. Vol. 27, 395–410. ISSN: 0198-9715.
   Google Scholar
• Stoter, J., Sorensen, E.M., and Bodum, L. 2004. 3D registration of real property in Denmark. FIG Working Week 2004, May, Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Stoter, J.E. and Van Oosterom, P.J.M., 2005. Technological aspects of a full 3D cadastral registration. International journal of geographical information science, 19 (6), 669–696. doi: 10.1080/13658810500106042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoter, J.E. and Van Oosterom, P.J.M., 2006. 3D cadastre in an international context: legal, organizational and technological aspects. Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 323 s. ISBN 0-8493-3932-4.
   Google Scholar
• Tjia, D. and Coetzee, S., 2013. Application of the land administration domain model to the city of Johannesburg land information system. South African journal of geomatics, 2 (3), 260–279.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oosterom, P.J.M., et al., 2006. Aspect of a 4D cadastre: a first exploration. XXIII FIG Congress Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oosterom, P.J.M., et al., 2011. World-wide inventory of the status of 3D cadastres in 2010 and expectations for 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oosterom, P.J.M., 2013. Research and development in 3D cadastres. Computers, environment and urban systems, 40, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oosterom, P.J.M., 2018. Best practices 3D cadastres – extended version international federation of surveyors. Copenhagen: FIG Publication. March. ISBN 978-87-92853-64-6, ISSN: 2311-8423.
   Google Scholar
• Wakker, W.J., van der Molen, P., and Lemmen, C., 2003. Land registration and cadastre in the Netherlands, and the role of cadastral boundaries: the application of GPS technology in the survey of cadastral boundaries. Journal of geospatial engineering, 5 (1), 3–10.
   Google Scholar