Cadastral updating: the case of Turkey

References

• Arıkan, R., 2004. Araştırma Teknikleri ve Rapor Hazırlama [Research techniques and report preparation]. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
   Google Scholar
• Babawuro, U. and Beiji, Z., 2012. Satellite imagery cadastral features extractions using image processing algorithms: a viable option for cadastral science. IJCSI, 9 (4), 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., Kitchingman, A., and Leach, J., 2010. On the nature and utility of natural boundaries for land and marine administration. Land use policy, 27 (3), 772–779. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biyik, C., 1999. Türkiye'de İkinci Kadastro Gerçeği [The second cadastre in Turkey truth]. In: HKMO 7. Harita Kurultayı Bildiriler Kitabı [Proceedings of the HKMO 7th map congress], March 1999. Ankara, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., et al., 2017. Scientific research methods. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1–360.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, O. and Çoruhlu, Y., 2008. The graphical cadastre problem in Turkey: the case of Trabzon province. Sensors, 8 (9), 5560–5575. doi: 10.3390/s8095560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, O. and Çoruhlu, Y.E., 2009. Determining the property ownership on cadastral works in Turkey. Land use policy, 26 (1), 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, O., Uzun, B., and Çete, M., 2008. Turkish cadastral system. Survey review, 40 (307), 54–66. doi: 10.1179/003962608X253484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döner, F., 2015. Evaluation of cadastre renovation studies in Turkey. Survey review, 47 (341), 141–152. doi: 10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effenberg, W., 2001. Spatial cadastral information systems: the maintenance of digital cadastral maps. (Doctoral dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Effenberg, W.W., Enemark, S., and Williamson, I.P., 1999. Framework for discussion of digital spatial data flow within cadastral systems. Australian surveyor, 44 (1), 35–43. doi: 10.1080/00050351.1999.10558770
   Google Scholar
• Effenberg, W.W. and Williamson, I.P., 1996. Data flows, standards and incremental cadastral update.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark, S., et al., 2014. Fit-for-purpose land administration. Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG). FIG Publication No. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark, S., 2016. Fit-for-purpose land administration for sustainable development. Gim international-the worldwide magazine for geomatics, 30 (8), 16–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, K., et al., 2009. Results from a comprehensive global navigation satellite system test in the CORS-TR network: case study. Journal of surveying engineering, 135 (1), 10–18. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2009)135:1(10)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eren, F., 2012. Mülkiyet Hukuku [Property law]. 2nd ed. Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Fetai, B., et al., 2019. Extraction of visible boundaries for cadastral mapping based on UAV imagery. Remote sensing, 11 (13), 1–20. numbered 1510. doi: 10.3390/rs11131510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GDLRC, 2008. Land registry and cadastre modernization project. Available from: https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/tr/icerik/tapu-ve-kadastro-modernizasyon-projesi-tkmp.
   Google Scholar
• GDLRC, 2010. Kadastro Kanunu 22/a Uygulaması ve Kontrol Genelgesi [Cadastre Law 22/a article application and control circular], circular no: 1712(2010/19).
   Google Scholar
• GDLRC, 2012. Kadastro Haritalarının Sayısallaştırılması [Digitization of cadastral maps], circular no: 1737 (2012/15).
   Google Scholar
• GDLRC, 2013. Instruction, number 1156 dated 08/02/2013 of the Cadastre Department, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• GDLRC, 2019a. Fotogrametrik harita üretimi ve detay ölçmelerinde kullanımı talimatı [Instruction for the photogrammetric mapping and use of it in detail measurements]. 26 Jul 2019.
   Google Scholar
• GDLRC, 2019b. Directorate of mapping, unit activity report for 2019. Available from: https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/sites/default/files/icerik/ekleri/2019_yili_birim_faaliyet_raporu.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Heipke, C., Woodsford, P.A., and Gerke, M., 2008. Updating geospatial databases from images. In: Z. Li, J. Chen, and E. Baltsavias, eds. ISPRS congress book. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 355–362.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, S., Gordini, C., and Kealy, A., 2008. Positional accuracy improvement: lessons learned from regional Victoria, Australia. Survey review, 40 (307), 29–42. doi: 10.1179/003962608X253457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasar, N., 2005. Scientific research method. 17th ed. Ankara: Nobel broadcast distribution, 81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kısa, A., 2016. Results and effects of true orthophoto project production, sixth remote sensing-GIS symposium, 5–7 October 2016. Adana. Available from: http://uzalcbs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_985.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., 2006. Renovating cadastral map: an Indian perspective. Hong Kong SAR: ITC.
   Google Scholar
• Mekik, C., Yildirim, O., and Bakici, S., 2011. The Turkish real time kinematic GPS network (TUSAGA-Aktif) infrastructure. Scientific research and essays, 6 (19), 3986–3999. doi: 10.5897/SRE10.923
   Google Scholar
• Mjøs, L.B., 2019. Cadastral development in Norway: the need for improvement. Survey review, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navratil, G., 2011. Cadastral boundaries: benefits of complexity. Journal of the urban & regional information systems association, 23 (1), 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette, 2005a. Large-scale map and map information production regulation, (no. 30460). 26 June 2018. Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette, 2005b. On the amendment of cadastre law no. 5304, (no. 25744). 3 Mar2005.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette, 2006a. Cadastre updatinge regulation, (no. 26361). 29 Nov 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette, 2006b. Implementing regulation on the digitization of cadastral maps, (no. 26356). 24 Nov 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ozludemir, T., et al., 2007. Quality of spatial data: spatial and height accuracy, Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi, 31 Oct 2007. Trabzon.
   Google Scholar
• Ozmus, L., et al., 2016. Fotogrametric development in GDLRC, sixth remote sensing-GIS symposium, 5–7 October 2016. Adana. Available from: http://uzalcbs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_1069.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Polat, Z.A., Alkan, M., and Sürmeneli, H.G., 2017. Determining strategies for the cadastre 2034 vision using an AHP-based SWOT analysis: a case study for the Turkish cadastral and land administration system. Land use policy, 67, 151–166. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadhani, S.A., Bennett, R.M., and Nex, F.C., 2018. Exploring UAV in Indonesian cadastral boundary data acquisition. Earth science informatics, 11 (1), 129–146. doi: 10.1007/s12145-017-0314-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, N., et al., 2015. Cadastral renewal and automation project in Cyprus (108) WCS-CE- the world cadastre Summit- Congress & Exhibition, 20–25 April. Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman, M., Hoekstra, A., and Schut, T., 1998. Cadastral map renovation: a Dutch perspective. In: XXI international congress: developing the profession in a developingworld: commission 7. Brighton: FIG, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sarı, Nİ. 2010. What is the renewal application? What is it not? Problems and solutions. Available from: http://tasinmazmulkiyeti.org.tr.
   Google Scholar
• Scheu, M., Effenberg, W., and Williamson, I.P., 2000. Incremental update and upgrade of spatial data.
   Google Scholar
• Simbizi, M.C.D., Bennett, R.M., and Zevenbergen, J., 2014. Land tenure security: revisiting and refining the concept for sub-Saharan Africa’s rural poor. Land use policy, 36, 231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W.H., 2008. Cadastral map renovation: an analysis of the South Korean perspective. Enschede: ITC.
   Google Scholar
• URL-1. 2020. General directorate of geographic information systems, true orthophoto project. Available from: https://cbs.csb.gov.tr/proje-calismalari-i-88743 [Accessed 1 February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• URL-2. 2019. Available from: http://cbs.GDLRC.gov.tr/istatistik/ParselEnvanter.aspx [Accessed 9 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• URL-3. 2019. Available from: https://www.GDLRC.gov.tr/tr/icerik/ust-yonetim-toplantisi-0 [Accessed 9 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Volkmann, W. and Barnes, G., 2014. Virtual surveying: mapping and modeling cadastral boundaries using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). In: Proceedings of the FIG congress: engaging the challenges—enhancing the relevance. Kuala Lumpur: FIG, 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wassie, Y.A., et al., 2018. A procedure for semi-automated cadastral boundary feature extraction from high-resolution satellite imagery. Journal of spatial science, 63 (1), 75–92. doi: 10.1080/14498596.2017.1345667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, I., 2009. Re-engineering the cadastre to support e-government. Permanent Committee on GIS Infrastructure for Asia and the Pacific, 18–41. https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/17634544/Re-Engineering_the_Cadastre_to_Support_E-Government.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I., et al., 2010. Land administration for sustainable development. Redlands: ESRI Press Academic. doi:10.2105/AJPH.86.8_Pt_2.P.4.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I. and Wallace, J., 2006. Spatially enabling governments: a new direction for.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, S., et al., 2015. Kadastroda Yenilemenin Kapsamı ve Getirdikleri (023) The World Cadastre Summit- congress & exhibition, 20–25 April 2015. Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, O., 2020. Regularised computation of 3D coordinates and orthometric heights for Northern Cyprus: new network computations for Northern Cyprus. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, doi:10.4430/bgta0308. Article in Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, O., Salgin, O., and Bakici, S., 2011. The Turkish CORS network (TUSAGA-Aktif). In: FIG working week. Marrakech: FIG, 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, O., Yaprak, S., and Inal, C., 2014. Determination of 2011 Van/Turkey earthquake (M = 7.2) effects from measurements of CORS-TR network. Geomatics, natural hazards and risk, 5 (2), 132–144. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2013.789453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, O. and Coruhlu, Y.E., 2017. The Turkish surveying private sector. Fresenius environmental bulletin, 26 (12 A), 393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, O., Coruhlu, Y.E., and Biyik, C., 2018. Registration of agricultural areas towards the development of a future Turkish cadastral system. Land use policy, 78, 207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, O., Çoruhlu, Y.E., and Demir, O., 2015. A visional overview to renovation concept on cadastral works in Turkey. Sigma journal of engineering and natural sciences, 33, 503–519.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, O., Uzun, B., and Çoruhlu, Y.E., 2018. Transition of agricultural land through inheritance and restrictions on the transfer of interactions. Ankara: Adalet Akademisi Dergisi.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, J., 2004. A systems approach to land registration and cadastre. Nordic journal of surveying and real estate research, 1 (1), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, J.A., 2009. Land administration: to see the change from day to day. Enschede: ITC. ISBN 978-90-6164-274-9.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, J., et al., 2013. Pro-poor land administration: principles for recording the land rights of the underrepresented. Land use policy, 31, 595–604. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar