Implementing a mass valuation application on interoperable land valuation data model designed as an extension of the national GDI

References

• Abidoye, R.B., et al., 2019. Predicting property price index using artificial intelligence techniques: evidence from Hong Kong. International journal of housing markets and analysis, 12 (6), 1072–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aclar, A. and Cagdas, V., 2008. Taşınmaz (Gayrimenkul) Değerlemesi. TMMOB Publication, Remark, Ankara, 92 p.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shalabi, M., et al., 2006. GIS based multicriteria approaches to housing site suitability assessment. FIG Congress 2006, Shaping the Change, Munich, Germany, 8–13 October.
   Google Scholar
• Antipov, E.A. and Pokryshevskaya, E.B., 2012. Mass appraisal of residential apartments: an application of random forest for valuation and a CART-based approach for model diagnostics. Expert systems with applications, 39, 1772–1778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appraisal Institute, 2001. The appraisal of real estate. Illinois: Appraisal Institute Publication, 618 p.
   Google Scholar
• Aydinoglu, A.C., 2016. Modelling, encoding and transforming of open geographic data to examine interoperability between GIS applications. Geocarto international, 31 (4), 446–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinoglu, A.C. and Bovkir, R., 2017. Generic land registry and cadastre data model supporting interoperability based on International standards for Turkey. Land use policy, 68, 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinoglu, A.C. and Kara, A., 2019. Modelling and publishing geographic data with model-driven and linked data approaches: case study of administrative units in Turkey. Journal of spatial science, 64 (1), 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldominos, A., et al., 2018. Identifying real estate opportunities using machine learning. Applied sciences, 8 (11), 2321.
   Google Scholar
• Basaraner, M., 2016. Revisiting cartography: towards identifying and developing a modern and comprehensive framework. Geocarto international, 31 (1), 71–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejar, R., et al., 2012. SDI-based business processes: a territorial analysis web information system in Spain. Computers & geosciences, 132, 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgiu, M. and Drăguţ, L., 2016. Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 114, 24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovkir, R. and Aydinoglu, A.C., 2018. Providing land value information from geographic data infrastructure by using fuzzy logic analysis approach. Land use policy, 78, 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovkir, R., Colkesen, I., and Aydinoglu, A.C., 2018. Calculating land values by using advanced statistical approaches in Pendik. FIG Congress 2018 Embracing our smart world where the continents connect: enhancing the geospatial maturity of societies, 6–11 May, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Bozic, B., et al., 2013. The use of multiple linear regression in property valuation. Geonauka, 1 (1), 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine learning, 45 (1), 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budic, Z.N., et al., 2004. Are SDIs serving the needs of local planning? case study of Victoria. Environmental urban system, 28, 329–351.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), 2014. Cadastre 2014 and Beyond. FIG Publications, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Candas, E., 2012. Taşınmaz Değerlemesi İçin Mevzuat Altyapısının Modellenmesi (MSc). Istanbul Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Ceh, M., et al., 2018. Estimating the performance of random forest versus multiple regression for predicting prices of the apartments. ISPRS international journal of geo-information, 7 (5), 168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, N., Parvathinathanb, G., and Breden, J.B., 2008. Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of environmental management, 87, 139–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaphalkar, N.B. and Dhatunde, M., 2015. Real property valuation using sales comparison method and multiple regression analysis. International journal of modern trends in engineering and research (IJMTER), 2 (8), 305–315.
   Google Scholar
• CMB (Capital Markets Board of Turkey), 2006. Sermaye Piyasasında Uluslararası Değerleme Standartları Hakkında Tebliğ. Capital Markets Board of Turkey, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, D.J., Rajabifard, A., and Kolodziej, K.W., 2016. Expanding the SDI environment: comparing current spatial data infrastructure with emerging indoor location-based services. International journal of digital earth, 9 (6), 629–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INSPIRE, 2014. D2.8. I.6 Data Specification on Cadastral Parcels, Technical Guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, P. and McLaughlin, J., 1988. Land information management. 1st ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, K., 2004. Land policies and land reform. Washington: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., 2013. LACONISS: A LAnd CONsolidation integrated support system for planning and decision making. Journal of geodesy, geoinformation and land management, 2, 119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., 2016. The assessment of land valuation in land consolidation schemes: the need for a new land valuation framework. Land use policy, 54, 487–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derinpinar, M. A., 2014. Real estate valuation using geographic information technology with fuzzy logic: Sariyer-Istanbul example (MSc). Istanbul Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Detwiler, J., 2019. GIS Programming and Software Development Course Notes. https://www.e-education.psu.edu/geog485/node/30 Accessed: 03.07.2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos, T. and Moulas, A., 2016. A Proposal of a mass appraisal system in Greece with CAMA system: evaluating GWR and MRA techniques in Thessaloniki Municipality. Open geosciences, 8, 675–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowall, D.E. and Clarke, G., 1996. A framework for reforming urban land policies in developing countries. Policy Paper, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dyca, B., 2018. Land value taxation and land speculation the case of São Paulo, Brazil (MSc). Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., 2014. Comparision of Hedonic Regression Method and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Housing Prices in Turkey. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, Skopje, Macedonia, 1–3 July.
   Google Scholar
• GD-GIS (General Directorate of GIS), 2012a. TUCBS.TK land registry and cadastre data theme- application schemas. In: H.I. Inan, T. Yomralioglu, and B. Uzun, eds. Ministry of environment and urbanization. Ankara: General Directorate of GIS, 229 p.
   Google Scholar
• GD-GIS (General Directorate of GIS), 2012b. TUCBS conceptual model components. In: A.C. Aydinoglu, A. Kara, and T. Yomralioglu, eds. Ministry of environment and urbanization. Ankara: General Directorate of GIS, 68 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, P.O., Benediktsson, J.A., and Sveinsson, J.R., 2006. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern recognition letters, 27 (4), 294–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloudemans, R.J., 1999. Mass appraisal of real property. Chicago, Illinois: International Association of Assessing Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, M.A.S. and Formoso, C.T., 2006. Mass appraisal with genetic fuzzy rule-based systems. Property management, 24 (1), 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, R., et al., 2011. GIS-based multiple-criteria decision analysis. Geography compass, 5 (6), 413–432.
   Google Scholar
• Grus, L., et al., 2011. An assessment view to evaluate whether spatial data Infrastructures meet their goals. Computers, environment and urban systems, 35 (3), 217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunes, T. and Yildiz, U., 2015. Mass valuation techniques used in Land registry and cadastre modernization project of Republic of Turkey. In: FIG working week 2015 – from the wisdom of the ages to the challenges of the modern world. Sofia, Bulgaria. 17–21 May.
   Google Scholar
• Gunes, T. and Yildiz, U., 2016. Property valuation and taxation for improving local governance in Turkey. Land tenure journal, 15 (2), 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, I., 2014. Continuous valuation model for work-in-progress investments with fuzzy logic method. Procedia engineering, 85, 206–213.
   Google Scholar
• IAAO-International Association of Assessing Officers, 2013. Standard on Mass Appraisal of Real Property. International Association of Assessing Officers, Kansas City, Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Ilhan, A.T., 2019. Investigation of applicability of artificial neural networks on mass valuation of real estates: The case of Gölbaşi district (MSc). Ankara University.
   Google Scholar
• International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC), 2017. International Valuation Standards. International Valuation Standards Council, London.
   Google Scholar
• Japkowicz, N. and Shah, M., 2011. Evaluating learning algorithms: A classification perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., 2015. Geospatial analysis requires a different way of thinking: the problem of spatial heterogeneity. Geojournal, 80 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokturk, E. and Kokturk, E., 2011. Taşınmaz Değerlemesi. 1th ed. Istanbul: Netcopy.
   Google Scholar
• Kontrimas, V. and Verikas, A., 2011. The mass appraisal of the real estate by computational intelligence. Applied soft computing, 11, 443–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krol, D., et al., 2007. Comparison of mamdani and TSK fuzzy models for real estate appraisal. In: B. Apolloni, R.J. Howlett, and L. Jain, eds. International conference on Knowledge Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 12–14 September. Italy: Vietri sul Mare, 1008–1015.
   Google Scholar
• Kusan, H., Aytekin, O., and Ozdemir, I., 2010. The use of fuzzy logic in predicting house selling price. Expert systems with applications, 37, 1808–1813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, K.C., Yu, C.Y., and Lam, C.K., 2009. Support vector machine and entropy based decision support system for property valuation. Journal of property research, 26, 213–233.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W., et al., 2018. Machine learning based prediction of the value of buildings. KSII transactions on internet and information systems, 12 (8), 3966–3991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.L., Ishii, H., and Yeh, K.Y., 2004. Estimating property value with fuzzy linguistic logic. Publications of the research institute for mathematical sciences, 5 (1373), 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, G., et al., 2019. Reflections and speculations on the progress in geographic information systems (GIS): a geographic perspective. International journal of geographical information science, 33 (2), 346–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, C. and Crompvoets, J., 2014. A stakeholder-based assessment framework applied to evaluate development scenarios for the spatial data infrastructure for Flanders. Computers, environment and urban systems, 46, 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marans, R. and Stimson, R., 2011. Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, methods, and empirical research. Social indicators research series, 45, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K.B., Sibbald, A.R., and Craw, S., 1999. Implementation of a spatial decision support system for rural land use planning: integrating geographic information system and environmental models with search and optimisation algorithms. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 23 (1), 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., et al., 2019. Estimation and updating methods for hedonic valuation. Journal of European real estate research, 1 (12), 134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey, W., et al., 1997. Interactive application of computer assisted mass appraisal and geographic information systems. Journal of property valuation and investment, 15 (5), 448–465.
   Google Scholar
• Molen, P.v.d., 2012. Land Ownership Information. FIG Publication No: 58- Spatially Enabled Society, pp. 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Nas, B. B., 2011. Development of an approach for real-estate valuation by the methods ANN and AVM (MSc). Selcuk University.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. and Cripps, A., 2001. Predicting housing value: a comparison of multiple regression analysis and artificial neural networks. Journal of real estate research, 22 (3), 313–336.
   Google Scholar
• Nisanci, R., 2005. The production of pixel based urban land value maps with nominal valuation method using GIS (PhD). Karadeniz Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, M., 2017. Utilizing automated GIS-functions through intuitive map solutions for end users (MSc). Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette, 2018. Presidential Amendment Decree on the organization of public institutions affiliated to the ministry. Official Gazette of Turkish Republic, No: 30479, Date: 15/07/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Oladunni, T., Sharma, S., and Tiwang, R., 2017. A Spatio – Temporal Hedonic House Regression Model. 16th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications, 18–21 December, Cancun, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Osei, A., 2006. The applications of geospatial information technology in Land management: a case study of Lagos, Nigeria. GSDI-9 Conference Proceedings. 6-10 November, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Pagourtzi, E., et al., 2003. Real estate appraisal: a review of valuation methods. Journal of property Investment and Finance, 21 (4), 383–401.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B. and Bae, J.K., 2015. Using machine learning algorithms for housing price prediction: The case of Fairfax County, Virginia housing data. Expert systems with applications, 42, 6806–6806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokach, L., 2010. Ensemble-based classifiers. Artificial intelligence review, 33 (1-2), 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokach, L., 2016. Decision forest: Twenty years of research. Information fusion, 27, 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), 2017. RICS Valuation – Global Standards. Valuation Professional Group of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sagi, O. and Rokach, L., 2018. Ensemble learning: A survey. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews – data mining and knowledge discovery, 8 (4), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang, N., Gold, C., and Miller, D., 2016. The topological viewshed: embedding topological pointers into digital terrain models to improve GIS capability for visual landscape analysis. International journal of digital earth, 9 (12), 1185–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarac, E., 2012. Real Estate Appraisal with Artificial Neural Networks Method (MSc). Istanbul Kultur University.
   Google Scholar
• Sarip, A.G. and Hafez, M.B., 2015. Fuzzy logic application for house price prediction. International journal of property Science, 5 (1), 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, M., 2006. AAA–the contribution of the AdV in an increasing European spatial data infrastructure – the German way. In Proceedings of the XXIII FIG Congress-Shaping the Change, 8–13 October.
   Google Scholar
• Selim, H., 2009. Determinants of house prices in Turkey: hedonic regression versus artificial neural network. Expert systems with applications, 36, 2843–2852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, D.K., Sharma, R.K., and Ghosh, D., 2006. A spatial decision support system for land management. International journal of computers and applications, 28 (1), 50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Specta, X., et al., 2019. The BonaRes metadata schema for geospatial soil-agricultural research data – Merging INSPIRE and DataCite metadata schemes. Computers and geosciences, 132, 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultani, R.M., Soliman, A.M., and Al-Hagla, K.S., 2009. The use of geographic information system (GIS) based spatial decision support system (SDSS) in developing the urban planning process. Architecture & planning journal, 20, 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• TDUB (Turkish Appraisers Association), 2011. TUGDES (Turkey Valuation Standards) Draft Study, 1st version.
   Google Scholar
• TEGoVA (The European Group of Valuers’ Associations), 2016. European Valuation Standards, 8th ed. Gillis Printing, Belgium 378 p.
   Google Scholar
• TKGM, 2006. Turkish National GIS Policy and Strategy Document – Action 36. General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• TKGM, 2011. 4th Component of Land Registry and Cadastre Modernization Project (TKMP): Determination and Registration of Real Estate Value. General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• TKGM, 2020. Official website of the TKGM, available at: https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/ Accessed: 10.05.2020.
   Google Scholar
• TKGM (General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre), 2005. A Preliminary Report to Build National GIS – Action 47. General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Unel, F.B. and Yalpir, S., 2019. Reduction of mass appraisal criteria with principal component analysis and integration to GIS. International journal of engineering and geosciences, 4, 94–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNWDF, 2017. Cape Town, South Africa. 1st United Nations World Data Forum Press Release 15-18 January.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, L., et al., 2017. Towards a high level of semantic harmonisation in the geospatial domain. Computers, environment and urban systems, 62, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kamp, I., et al., 2003. Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and urban planning, 65 (1-2), 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2014. Real estate price forecasting based on SVM optimized by PSO. Optik-international journal for light and electron optics, 125 (3), 1439–1443.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I., Rajabifard, A., and Binns, A., 2006. The role of spatial data infrastructures in establishing an enabling platform for decision making in Australia. GSDI-9 Conference Proceedings. 6–10 November, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S.W., Tang, B.S., and van Horen, B., 2006. Strategic urban management in China: a case study of Guangzhou development district. Habitat International, 30 (3), 645–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2008. Project appraisal document on a proposed loan in the amount of euro 135.0 million to the republic of Turkey for a land registry and cadastre modernization project. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/608031468338987781/pdf/ 431740PAD0P106101official0use0only1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yalpir, S., et al., 2014. Creating a valuation map in GIS through artificial neural network methodology: a case study. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 19 (2), 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalpir, S., 2018. Enhancement of parcel valuation with adaptive artificial neural network modeling. Artificial intelligence review, 49, 393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, N., et al., 2009. Life satisfaction of urban residents: Do health perception, wealth, safety, community pride and, and cultural tourism matter? International CHRIE Conference-Refereed Track, Event 24, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, K., 1997. Valuation Methods and Valuation Criteria in Privatization (MSc). Republic of Turkey - State Planning Organization, Directorate of Finance, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Yomralioglu, T. and Aydinoglu, A.C., 2014. Policies and Standards for Building Turkey National GIS Infrastructure. FIG Congress 2014, Engaging the Challenges – Enhancing the Relevance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 16-21 June.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., et al., 2018. A cyberGIS-enabled multi-criteria spatial decision support system: A case study on flood emergency management. International journal of digital earth, 12 (11), 1364–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurada, J., Levitan, A.S., and Guan, J., 2011. A comparison of regression and artificial intelligence methods in a mass appraisal context. Journal of real estate research, 33, 349–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar