The novelty hybrid model development proposal for mass appraisal of real estates in sustainable land management

References

• Abdullahi, A., Usman, H., and Ibrahim, I., 2018. Determining house price for mass appraisal using multiple regression analysis modeling in Kaduna North. ATBU journal of environmental technology, 11 (1), 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Abidoye, R.B., and Chan, A.P., 2018. Improving property valuation accuracy: a comparison of hedonic pricing model and artificial neural network. Pacific rim property research journal, 24 (1), 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aclar, A., et al., 2003. Taşınmaz Değerlemesi Sistem Tasarımı, 9. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Akar, A.U., Yalpir, S., and Sisman, S., 2019. New hybrid model proposal for real estate valuation estimation modeling: konya case, 3. International Mersin symposium, 31 October-2 November, Mersin.
   Google Scholar
• Aydinoglu, A.C., Bovkir, R., and Colkesen, I., 2020. Implementing a mass valuation application on interoperable land valuation data model designed as an extension of the national GDI. Survey review, 53 (379), 349–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barańska, A., 2013. Real estate mass appraisal in selected countries – functioning systems and proposed solutions. Real estate management and valuation, 21 (3), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bencure, J.C., et al., 2019. Development of an innovative land valuation model (iLVM) for mass appraisal application in sub-urban areas using AHP: an integration of theoretical and practical approaches. Sustainability, 11 (13), 3731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J., Guttery, R., and Sirmans, C.F., 2004. Mass appraisal: an introduction to multiple regression analysis for real estate valuation. Journal of real estate practice and education, 7 (1), 65–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bin, J., et al., 2017, September. Regression model for appraisal of real estate using recurrent neural network and boosting tree. In: 2017 2nd IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and applications (ICCIA). IEEE, 209–213.
   Google Scholar
• Bovkir, R., and Aydinoglu, A.C., 2018. Providing land value information from geographic data infrastructure by using fuzzy logic analysis approach. Land use policy, 78, 46–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujang, A.A., Zarin, H.A., and Jumadi, N., 2010. The relationship between demographic factors and housing affordability. Malaysian journal of real estate, 5 (1), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cagdas, V., and Aclar, A. 2008. Real estate valuation, union of chambers of Turkish engineer and architects. Ankara: Chamber of Survey and Cadastre Engineers, ISBN.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, C.W., and Douglas, P.H., 1928. A theory of production. The American economic review, 18 (1), 139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., and Forte, F., 2017. Using genetic algorithms for real estate appraisals. Buildings, 7 (2), 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derinpinar, M.A., and Aydinoglu, A.C., 2015. Bulanık Mantık ile Coğrafi Bilgi Teknolojilerini Kullanarak Taşınmaz Değerlemesi. TMMOB harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Des Rosiers, F., and Thériault, M., 2008. Mass appraisal, hedonic price modelling and urban externalities: understanding property value shaping processes. In: T. Kauko and d'Amato, eds. Mass appraisal methods: an international perspective for property valuers. West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 111–147.
   Google Scholar
• Dmytrów, K., and Gnat, S., 2019. Application of AHP method in assessment of the influence of attributes on value in the process of real estate valuation. Real estate management and valuation, 27 (4), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, L., and Leydesdorff, L., 2009. The relation between Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and Salton’s cosine measure. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 60 (5), 1027–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichholtz, P.M., et al., 1995. Real estate portfolio diversification by property type and region. Journal of property finance, 6 (3), 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogdu, S. 2012. The real estate appraisal. Master thesis. Ege University, Institute of Science, İzmir.
   Google Scholar
• Ergin, M. 2013. Analysis by type of real estate valuation reports, Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• EU, 2004. European Union land policy guidelines, guidelines for support to land policy design and land policy reform processes in developing countries, EU task force on land tenure, 35 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, S., and Rogerson, P., 2014. Spatial analysis and GIS. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• French, N., 2008. A valuer’s guide to the RICS red book. Journal of property investment & finance, 26 (1), 101–102.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, X., et al., 2018. Applying DEA and Cobb-Douglas model to analyze and evaluate the efficiency of science and technology development in China. In: 2018 4th international conference on information management (ICIM). IEEE, 246–252.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparėnienė, L., Remeikienė, R., and Skuka, A., 2016. Assessment of the impact of macroeconomic factors on housing price level: Lithuanian case. Intellectual economics, 10 (2), 122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiadis, A., 2018. Real estate valuation using regression models and artificial neural networks: an applied study in Thessaloniki. RELAND: international journal of real estate & land planning, 1, 292–303.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., et al., 2016. Spatially non-stationary relationships between urban residential land price and impact factors in Wuhan city. Applied geography, 68, 48–56. China.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAAO, 2017. Standard on mass appraisal of real property. Kansas City: The International Association of Assessing Officers.
   Google Scholar
• IAAO, International Association of Assessing Officers, 2013. Standard on mass appraisal of real property. Kansas City, Missouri: International Association of Assessing Officers.
   Google Scholar
• IVS, 2011. International valuation standards (IVS). London, UK: International Valuation Standards Council.
   Google Scholar
• IVSC, 2003. International valuation standards committee (IVSC). International valuation standards. London, UK: International Valuation Standards Committee, Glossary of Terms for IVS, Sixth Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Karakus, H.H. 2011. Valuation of real estate in urban areas and the example of Balıkesir. Master thesis, Balikesir University, Institute of Science, Balikesir.
   Google Scholar
• Kheir, N., and Portnov, B.A., 2016. Economic, demographic and environmental factors affecting urban land prices in the Arab sector in Israel. Land use policy, 50, 518–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokturk, E., 2003. Coğrafi bilgi sistemi (CBS) ne değildir? TUJK bilimsel Toplantısı, Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Jeodezik Ağlar Çalıştayı, 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kordi, M., and Brandt, S.A., 2012. Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multi-criteria decision analysis. Computers, environment and urban systems, 36 (1), 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozioł-Kaczorek, D., 2014. The use of combined multi-criteria method for the valuation of real estate. Optimum, studia ekonomiczne, 5 (71), 208–218.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, A.L., and Bitter, C., 2012. Spatial econometrics, land values and sustainability: trends in real estate valuation research. Cities, 29, S19–S25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levantesi, S., and Piscopo, G., 2020. The importance of economic variables on London real estate market: a random forest approach. Risks, 8 (4), 112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.P., 2002. The application of Cobb-Douglas production cost functions to construction firms in Japan and Taiwan. Review of pacific basin financial markets and policies, 5 (01), 111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mahaboob, B., et al., 2019. On Cobb-Douglas production function model. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol. 2177, no. 1, p. 020040. AIP Publishing LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J., 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in planning, 62 (1), 3–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manganelli, B., Paola, P.D., and Giudice, V.D., 2018. A multi-objective analysis model in mass real estate appraisal. International journal of business intelligence and data mining, 13 (4), 441–455.
   Google Scholar
• McCain, R.A., Jensen, P., and Meyer, S., 2003. Research on valuation of land and improvements in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Department of Economics and International Business, LeBow College of Business Administration, Drexel University.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, H., and Fang, H., 2017. A study on the real estate price forecast model in the Midwest of china–based on provincial panel data analysis. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on management science and engineering management, Singapore: Springer, 525–536.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, B.Y., Kim, S.Y., and Kang, G.J., 2008. Initial ship design using a Pearson correlation coefficient and artificial intelligence techniques. International journal of modern physics B, 22 (09n11), 1801–1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourifié, I., and Siow, A. 2017. The Cobb Douglas marriage matching function: marriage matching with peer and scale effects. Available at SSRN, 2541895.
   Google Scholar
• Nikkhah, A., et al., 2016. Integration of life cycle assessment and Cobb-Douglas modeling for the environmental assessment of kiwifruit in Iran. Journal of cleaner production, 137, 843–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwaogbe, O.R., Pius, A., and Idoko, F.O., 2017. Estimating Nigerian airports production functions using Cobb Douglas analytical model. International scientific journal of air transport industry (AERO-journal), (2), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan, G., and Yalpir, S., 2005. Taşınmaza Ekonomik Bakış ve Değerlendirmesi, TMMOB, Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 10. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 28 Mart – 1 Nisan 2005, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Pagourtzi, E., et al., 2003. Real estate appraisal: a review of valuation methods. Journal of property investment & finance, 21 (4), 383–401.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, G., 2015. The glossary of property terms. 2nd ed. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Parygin, D.S., et al., 2018. Categorical data processing for real estate objects valuation using statistical analysis. In journal of physics: conference series, IOP publishing, 1015 (3), 032102.
   Google Scholar
• PCCEU, 2003. Common Principles on Cadastre in the European Union, Permanent Committee on Cadastre in the European Union (PCCEU), Rome 3rd, December 2003. https://www.eurocadastre.org.
   Google Scholar
• Property Tax Law, Real Estate Tax Law, 1970. Official gazette law number published in: 1319. Ankara, Turkey: Revenue administration.
   Google Scholar
• Prus, B., Król, K., and Chrobot, K., 2018. Analysis of the correlation between socio-economic development and land prices–a study of the Zagnańsk municipality. Acta scientiarum polonorum. formatio circumiectus, 17 (2), 87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real Estate Tax Law (Turkey), 1970. 1319 Sayılı Emlak Vergisi Kanunu, Kabul Tarihi: 29/7/1970, Yayımlandığı Resmi Gazetenin Tarihi: 11/8/1970, Sayısı: 13576, Yayımlandığı Düsturun Tertibi: 5, Cildi: 9, Sayfası: 2662.
   Google Scholar
• Renigier-Biłozor, M., Janowski, A., and d’Amato, M., 2019. Automated valuation model based on fuzzy and rough set theory for real estate market with insufficient source data. Land use policy, 87, 104021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini, P., and Kershaw, P. 2005. Using a hybrid automated valuation model to estimate capital and site values, Doctoral dissertation, Pacific Rim Real Estate Society.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. USA: Resource allocation, RWS publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sarip, A.G., Hafez, M.B., and Daud, M.N., 2016. Application of fuzzy regression model for real estate price prediction. Malaysian journal of computer science, 29 (1), 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensuse, D.I., Cahyaningsih, E., and Wibowo, W.C., 2015. Identifying knowledge management process of Indonesian government human capital management using analytical hierarchy process and Pearson correlation analysis. Procedia computer science, 72, 233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Sisman, S., and Aydinoglu, A.C., 2020. Using GIS based multi criteria decision analysis techniques in the smart cities. In: The fifth international conference on smart city applications. SCA-2020, Karabuk, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Sisman, S., Yalpir, S., and Akar, A.U. 2019. Cobb-Douglas hybrid model application for estimation of real estate value. In: 3. International Mersin symposium, 31 October–2 November, Mersin.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J.J., Zhuang, S.Y., and Zhao, T.S., 2015. Applications of Cobb-Douglas model in construction technology progress contribution ratio. Journal of civil engineering and management, 32 (2), 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. S. 2001. Human society and the global economy, SUNY-Oswego, department of economics. Available from: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oet:tbooks:prin7.
   Google Scholar
• UN and FIG, 1999. Report of the workshop on land tenure and cadastral infrastructures for sustainable development, Final Edition, Bathurst, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Unel, F.B., and Yalpir, S., 2019a. Reduction of mass appraisal criteria with PCA and integration to GIS. International journal of engineering and geosciences, 4 (3), 94–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unel, F.B., and Yalpir, S., 2019b. Valuations of building plots using the AHP method. International journal of strategic property management, 23 (3), 197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USPAP, 2013. The uniform standards of professional appraisal practice (USPAP). USA, The Appraisal Standards Board, The Appraisal Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Valier, A., 2020. Who performs better? AVMs vs hedonic models. Journal of property investment & finance, 38 (3), 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, A., et al., 2018. House price prediction using machine learning and neural networks. In: 2018 second international conference on inventive communication and computational technologies (ICICCT), IEEE, 1936–1939.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2014. Real estate price forecasting based on SVM optimized by PSO. Optic-International journal for light and electron optics, 125 (3), 1439–1443.
   Google Scholar
• Wootton, J.L., Estates Gazette and South Bank Polytechnic (1989). The glossary of property terms. London: Estates Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• Yalpir, S., and Bayrak, E., 2017. Real estate valuation in urban regeneration application: case study of Konya. Selcuk university, journal of engineering, science and technology, 5 (1), 96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Yalpir, S., and Ozkan, G., 2018. Knowledge-based FIS and ANFIS models development and comparison for residential real estate valuation. International journal of strategic property management, 22 (2), 110–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalpir, S., and Unel, F.B., 2016. Türkiye’de ve Uluslararası çalışmalarda arsa değerlemede kullanılan kriterlerin irdelenmesi ve Faktör Analizi ile azaltımı. Afyon kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16 (2), 303–322.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., et al., 2017. Spatiotemporal effects of main impact factors on residential land price in major cities of China. Sustainability, 9 (11), 2050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, I.C., and Hsu, T.K., 2018. Building real estate valuation models with comparative approach through case-based reasoning. Applied soft computing, 65, 260–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, L., Xiao, Y., and Xu, Z. 2013. A new principle based on Pearson correlation coefficient to avoid mal-operation of the restricted earth fault protection.
   Google Scholar
• Yomralioglu, T., 1995. Taşınmazların değerlendirilmesi. Trabzon: Lecture notes, KTU.
   Google Scholar
• Yomralioglu, T., 2005. Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri: Temel kavramlar ve uygulamalar. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Yomralioglu, T., et al., 2011. Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Taşınmaz Değerlemesi.
   Google Scholar
• Yomralıoğlu, T., 1997. Taşınmazların değerlendirilmesi ve kat mülkiyeti mevzuatı. JEFOD-Kentsel Alan Düzenlemelerinde İmar Planı Uygulama Teknikleri, 153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and Cheng, D.C., 2011. Analysis on the İnput-output of real estate based on Cobb-Douglas production function in henan province. Journal of southwest university for nationalities (natural science edition), S1.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., et al., 2018. Artificial neural networks and the mass appraisal of real estate. International journal of online engineering, 14 (3), 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., and Yuan, J., 2015. Pressure transfer modeling for an urban water supply system based on Pearson correlation analysis. Journal of hydroinformatics, 17 (1), 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar