A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output

REFERENCES

• Abramowitz , M. and Stegun , I. A. 1970 . Handbook of Mathematical Functions New York : Dover Publications. .
   Google Scholar
• Archer , G. , Saltelli , A. and Sobol' , I. M. 1997 . “Sensitivity Measures, ANOVA like Techniques and the Use of Bootstrap,” . Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation , 58 : 99 – 120 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box , G. E. P. , Hunter , W. G. and Hunter , J. S. 1978 . Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building New York : Wiley. .
   Google Scholar
• Cacuci , D. G. 1981a . “Sensitivity Theory for Nonlinear Systems. I. Nonlinear Functional Analysis Approach,” . Journal of Mathematical Physics , 22 : 2794 – 2802 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacuci , D. G. 1981b . “Sensitivity Theory for Nonlinear Systems. II. Extensions to Additional Classes of Response,” . Journal of Mathematical Physics , 22 : 2803 – 2812 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo , F. and Saltelli , A. 1997 . “Sensitivity Analysis of an Environmental Model; a Worked Application of Different Analysis Methods,” . Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 52 : 49 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawlfield , J. D. and Wu , M.-C. 1993 . “Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis for One-Dimensional Reactive Transport in Porous Media,” . Water Resources Research , 29 : 661 – 672 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter , S. C. 1979 . “A Screening Design for Factorial Experiments With Interactions,” . Biometrika , 66 : 317 – 320 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukier , R. I. , Fortuin , C. M. , Shuler , K. E. , Petschek , A. G. and Schaibly , J. H. 1973 . “Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Rate Coefficients. I. Theory,” . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 59 : 3873 – 3878 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukier , R. I. , Levine , H. B. and Shuler , K. E. 1978 . “Nonlinear Sensitivity Analysis of Multiparameter Model Systems,” . Journal of Computational Physics , 26 : 1 – 42 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukier , R. I. , Schaibly , J. H. and Shuler , K. E. 1975 . “Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Rate Coefficients. III. Analysis of the Approximations,” . The Journal of Chemical Physics , 63 : 1140 – 1149 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helton , J. C. 1993 . “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Use in Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal,” . Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 42 : 327 – 367 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homma , T. and Saltelli , A. 1996 . “Importance Measures in Global Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Models,” . Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 52 : 1 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora , S. C. and Iman , R. L. 1986 . “A Comparison of Maximum/Bounding and Bayesian/Monte Carlo for Fault Tree Uncertainty Analysis,” Sandia , NM : Sandia National Laboratories. . Technical Report SAND85–2839
   Google Scholar
• Iman , R. L. and Hora , S. C. 1990 . “A Robust Measure of Uncertainty Importance for Use in Fault Tree System Analysis,” . Risk Analysis , 10 : 401 – 406 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishigami , T. and Homma , T. “An Importance Quantification Technique in Uncertainty Analysis for Computer Models,” . Proceedings of the ISUMA '90, First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modelling and Analysis, Univ. of Maryland, USA . pp. 398 – 403 . New York : IEEE Computer Society. .
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen , J. P. C. and Helton , J. C. 1998 . “Statistical Analyses of Scatterplots to Identify Important Factors in Large-Scale Simulations,” Sandia , NM : Sandia National Laboratories. . technical report
   Google Scholar
• Koda , M. , McRae , G. J. and Seinfeld , J. H. 1979 . “Automatic Sensitivity Analysis of Kinetic Mechanisms,” . International Journal of Chemical Kinetics , 11 : 427 – 444 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzykacz , B. 1990 . “SAMOS: A Computer Program for the Derivation of Empirical Sensitivity Measures of Results From Large Computer Models,” Garching , , Germany : Gesellschaft fuer Reaktor Sicherheit (GRS) MbH. . Technical Report GRS-A-1700
   Google Scholar
• Liepmann , D. and Stephanopoulos , G. 1985 . “Development and Global Sensitivity Analysis of a Closed Ecosystem Model,” . Ecological Modelling , 30 : 13 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay , M. D. 1996 . “Variance-Based Methods for Assessing Uncertainty Importance in NUREG-1150 Analyses,” Los Alamos , NM : Los Alamos National Laboratory. . Report LA-UR-96–2695
   Google Scholar
• Morris , M. D. 1991 . “Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments,” . Technometrics , 33 : 161 – 174 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblow , E. M. , Pin , F. G. and Wright , R. Q. 1986 . “Sensitivity Analysis Using Computer Calculus: A Nuclear Waste Isolation Application,” . Nuclear Science and Engineering , 94 : 46 – 56 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA PSAC User Group . 1989 . “PSACOIN Level E Intercomparison, an International Code Intercomparison Exercise on a Hypothetical Safety Assessment Case Study for Radioactive Waste Disposal Systems,” Paris : OECD/NEA. . technical report
   Google Scholar
• Pierce , T. H. and Cukier , R. I. 1981 . “Global Nonlinear Sensitivity Analysis Using Walsh Functions,” . Journal of Computational Physics , 41 : 427 – 443 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabitz , H. 1989 . “System Analysis at Molecular Scale,” . Science , 246 : 221 – 226 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks , J. , Welch , W. J. , Mitchell , T. J. and Wynn , H. P. 1989 . “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,” . Statistical Science , 4 : 409 – 435 .
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A. , Andres , T. H. and Homma , T. 1993 . “Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output: An Investigation of New Techniques,” . Computational Statistics and Data Analysis , 15 : 211 – 238 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A. , Andres , T. H. and Homma , T. 1995 . “Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output. Performance of the Iterated Fractional Factorial Design (IFFD) Method,” . Computational Statistics and Data Analysis , 20 : 387 – 407 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A. and Bolado , R. 1998 . “An Alternative Way to Compute Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST),” . Computational Statistics and Data Analysis , 26 : 445 – 460 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A. and Scott , M. 1997 . “The Role of Sensitivity Analysis in the Corroboration of Models and its Links to Model Structural and Parametric Uncertainty,” . Reliability Engineering and System Safety (Special Issue on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output) , 52 : 1 – 4 .
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli , A. and Sobol' , I. M. 1995 . “About the Use of Rank Transformation in Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output,” . Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 50 : 225 – 239 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaibly , J. H. and Shuler , K. E. 1973 . “Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Rate Coefficients. Part II, Applications,” . Journal of Chemical Physics , 59 : 3879 – 3888 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol' , I. M. 1993 . “Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models,” . Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment , 1 : 407 – 414 . [translation of Sobol' (1990), “Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models,” Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2, 112–118 (in Russian)]
   Google Scholar
• Turanyi , T. 1990 . “Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Kinetic Systems. Tools and Applications,” . Journal of Mathematical Chemistry , 5 : 203 – 248 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyl , H. 1938 . “Mean Motion,” . American Journal of Mathematics , 60 : 889 – 896 .
   Google Scholar