An Efficient Screening Method for Computer Experiments

REFERENCES

• Andres, T. (1997), “Sampling Methods and Sensitivity Analysis for Large Parameter Sets,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 57, 77–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo, F., and Braddock, R. (1999), “The Use of Graph Theory in the Sensitivity Analysis of the Model Output: A Second Order Screening Method,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 64, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., and Saltelli, A. (2007), “An Effective Screening Design for Sensitivity Analysis of Large Models,” Environmental Modelling Software, 22, 1509–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Saltelli, A., and Schoutens, W. (2004), “Enhancing the Morris Method,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, Santa Fe, New Mexico, pp. 369–379.
   Google Scholar
• Cukier, R., Fortuin, C., Shuler, K., Petschek, A., and Schaibly, J. (1973), “Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Ratecoefficients,” Journal of Chemical Physics, 59, 3873–3878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garthwaite, P.H., and Dickey, J.M. (1988), “Quantifying Expert Opinion in Linear Regression Problems,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50, 462–474.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, J.C., Annan, J.D., Edwards, N.R., and Marsh, R. (2004), “An Efficient Climate Forecasting Method Using an Intermediate Complexity Earth System Model and the Ensemble Kalman Filter,” Climate Dynamics, 23, 745–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadane, J.B., Dickey, J.M., Winkler, R.L., Smith, W.S., and Peters, S.C. (1980), “Interactive Elicitation of Opinion for a Normal Linear Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 845–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M., Anderson, C., O’Hagan, A., Lomas, M., Woodward, F., Gosling, J., and Heinemeyer, A. (2008), “Quantifying Uncertainty in the Biospheric Carbon Flux for England and Wales,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 171, 109–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P.C. (2009), “Factor Screening in Simulation Experiments: Review of Sequential Bifurcation,” Advancing the Frontiers of Simulation: A Festschrift in Honor of George S. Fishman, 133, 153–167.
   Google Scholar
• Linkletter, C., Bingham, D., Hengartner, N., Higdon, D., and Kenny, Q.Ye (2006), “Variable Selection for Gaussian Process Models in Computer Experiments,” Technometrics, 48, 478–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M.D. (1991), “Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments,” Technometrics, 33, 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M.D., and Mitchell, T.J. (1995), “Exploratory Designs for Computational Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederreiter, H. (1992), Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, A. (2006), “Bayesian Analysis of Computer Code Outputs: A Tutorial,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 1290–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol, G. (2009), “Simplex-Based Screening Designs for Estimating Metamodels,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 1156–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol, G., Iooss, B., and Janon, A. (2013), Sensitivity: Sensitivity Analysis, R package version 1.7. . Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sensitivity/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi, S.S., Rosenkrantz, D.J., and Tayi, G.K. (1994), “Heuristic and Special Case Algorithms for Dispersion Problems,” Operations Research, 42, 299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, B.J., Storlie, C.B., and Bondell, H.D. (2009), “Variable Selection in Bayesian Smoothing Spline Anova Models: Application to Deterministic Computer Codes,” Technometrics, 51, 110–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, J., Welch, W., Mitchell, T., and Wynn, H. (1989), “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,” Statistical Science, 4, 409–423.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. (eds.) (2000), Sensitivity Analysis, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Savitsky, T., Vannucci, M., and Sha, N. (2011), “Variable Selection for Nonparametric Gaussian Process Priors: Models and Computational Strategies,” Statistical Science, 26, 130–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, A., Kauhala, F., Holmala, K., and Smith, G. (2008), “Towards the Elimination of Rabies in Eurasia,” Developments in Biologicals, 131, 213–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ——— (2009), “Rabies in Northeastern Europe—The Threat From Invasive Raccoon Dogs,” Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 45, 1121–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol, I.M. (1993), “Sensitivity Analysis for Non-Linear Mathematical Models,” Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment, 1, 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Wedge, D.C., Rowe, W., Kell, D.B., and Knowles, J. (2009), “In Silico Modelling of Directed Evolution: Implications for Experimental Design and Stepwise Evolution,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 257, 131–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar