References
- Aksin, Z., Armony, M., and Mehrotra, V. (2007), “The Modern Call Center: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective on Operations Management Research,” Production and Operations Management, 16, 665–688.
- Ankenman, B., Nelson, B.L., and Staum, J. (2010), “Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling,” Operations Research, 58, 371–382.
- Bernardo, M., Buck, R., Liu, L., Nazaret, W., Sacks, J., and Welch, W. (1992), “Integrated Circuit Design Optimization Using a Sequential Strategy,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 11, 361–372.
- Cioppa, T.M., and Lucas, T.W. (2007), “Efficient Nearly Orthogonal and Space-Filling Latin Hypercubes,” Technometrics, 49, 45–55.
- Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W.H. (1991), “A Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Eddy Viscosity Model,” Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3, 1760–1765.
- He, X., and Qian, P. Z.G. (2011), “Nested Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercube Designs,” Biometrika, 98, 721–731.
- He, Y., and Ai, M. (2011), “A New Class of Latin Hypercube Designs With High-Dimensional Hidden Projective Uniformity,” Frontiers of Mathematics in China, 6, 1085–1093.
- Hernandez, A.S., Lucas, T.W., and Carlyle, M. (2012), “Enabling Nearly Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Construction for any Non-Saturated Run-Variable Combination,” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 20:, 22, 1–17.
- Johnson, M., Moore, L., and Ylvisaker, D. (1990), “Minimax and Maximin Distance Designs,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 26, 131–148.
- Joseph, V.R., and Hung, Y. (2008), “Orthogonal–Maximin Latin Hypercube Designs,” Statistica Sinica, 18, 171–186.
- Journel, A.G., and Huijbregts, C.J. (1978), Mining Geostatistics, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Lam, C. (2008), “Sequential Adaptive Designs in Computer Experiments for Response Surface Model Fit,” Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
- Loeppky, J.L., Moore, L.M., and Williams, B.J. (2010), “Batch Sequential Designs for Computer Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140, 1452–1464.
- Matheron, G. (1963), “Principles of Geostatistics,” Economic Geology, 58, 1246–1266.
- McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J., and Conover, W.J. (1979), “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code,” Technometrics, 21, 239–245.
- Morris, M.D., and Mitchell, T.J. (1995), “Exploratory Designs for Computational Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381–402.
- Owen, A. (1994), “Lattice Sampling Revisited: Monte Carlo Variance of Means Over Randomized Orthogonal Arrays,” Annals of Statistics, 22, 930–945.
- ——— (1992), “Orthogonal Arrays for Computer Experiments, Integration and Visualization,” Statistica Sinica, 2, 439–452.
- Qian, P. Z.G., and Wu, C. F.J. (2009), “Sliced Space-Filling Designs,” Biometrika, 96, 945–956.
- Ranjan, P., Bingham, D., and Michailidis, G. (2008), “Sequential Experiment Design for Contour Estimation From Complex Computer Codes,” Technometrics, 50, 527–541.
- Ranjan, P., and Spencer, N. (2014), “Space-Filling Latin Hypercube Designs Based on Randomization Restrictions in Factorial Experiments,” Statistics & Probability Letters94
- Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J., and Wynn, H.P. (1989), “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,” Statistical Science, 4, 409–435.
- Tang, B. (1993), “Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercubes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1392–1397.
- Worley, B. (1987), “Deterministic Uncertainty Analysis,” ORNL-6428, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.