Emulation of Numerical Models With Over-Specified Basis Functions

References

• Chevalier, R. A. (1997), “Type II Supernovae SN 1987A and SN 1993J,” Science, 276, 1374–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldred, M. S., Webster, C. G., and Constantine, P. (2008), “Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Approaches for Wiener-Askey Generalized Polynomial Chaos,” in Proceedings of the 10th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, Paper No. AIAA 2008-1892.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, O. G., Mugler, A., Starkloff, H. J., and Ullmann, E. (2012), “On the Convergence of Generalized Polynomial Chaos Expansions,” ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 46, 317–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, J., Bingham, D., Holloway, J. P., Grosskopf, M. J., Kuranz, C. C., and Rutter, E. (2013), “Prediction and Computer Model Calibration Using Outputs From Multifidelity Simulators,” Technometrics, 55, 501–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramacy, R. (2007), “tgp: An R Package for Bayesian Nonstationary, Semiparametric Nonlinear Regression and Design by Treed Gaussian Process Models,” Journal of Statistical Software, 19, 1–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gramacy, R. B., and Lee, H. K. H. (2008), “Bayesian Treed Gaussian Process Models With an Application to Computer Modeling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1119–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), “Cases for the Nugget in Modeling Computer Experiments,” Statistics and Computing, 22, 713–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higdon, D., Gattiker, J., Williams, B., and Rightley, M. (2008), “Computer Model Calibration Using High-Dimensional Output,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 570–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, C. G., Bingham, D., Habib, S., Heitmann, K., and Frieman, J. A. (2011), “Efficient Emulators of Computer Experiments Using Compactly Supported Correlation Functions, With an Application to Cosmology,” The Annals of Applied Statistics, 5, 2470–2492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. C., and O’Hagan, A. (2001), “Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 63, 425–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo, I., Kuo, H. H., and Namli, S. (2007), “The Characterization of a Class of Probability Measures by Multiplicative Renormalization,” Communications on Stochastic Analysis, 1, 455–472.
   Google Scholar
• Kuranz, C. C., Drake, R. P., Huntington, C. M., Krauland, C. M., Stefano, C. A., Trantham, M., Grosskopf, M. J., Klein, S. R., and Marion, D. C. (2013), “Early-Time Evolution of a Radiative Shock,” High Energy Density Physics, 9, 315–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loéve, M. (1978), Probability Theory ( 4th ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marzouk, Y. M., and Xiu, D. (2009), “A Stochastic Collocation Approach to Bayesian Inference in Inverse Problems,” Communications in Computational Physics, 6, 826–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClarren, R. G., Ryu, D., Drake, P., Grosskopf, M., Bingham, D., Chou, C., Fryxell, B., Van der Holst, B., Holloway, J. P., Kuranz, C. C., Mallick, B., Rutter, E., and Torralva, B. R. (2011), “A Physics Informed Emulator for Laser-Driven Radiating Shock Simulations,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, 1194–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979), “Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code,” Technometrics, 21, 239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciorek, C., and Schervish, M. (2004), “Nonstationary Covariance Functions for Gaussian Process Regression,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 16, 273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, P. Z. G., Wu, H., and Wu, C. F. J. (2009), “Gaussian Process Models for Computer Experiments With Qualitative and Quantitative Factors,” Technometrics, 50, 383–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reighard, A. B., Drake, R. P., Dannenberg, K. K., Kremer, D. J., Grosskopf, M. J., Harding, E. C., Leibrandt, D. R., Glendinning, S. G., Perry, T. S., Remington, B. A., Greenough, J., Knauer, J., Boehly, T., Bouquet, S., Boireau, L., Koenig, M., and Vinci, T. (2006), “Observation of Collapsing Radiative Shocks in Laboratory Experiments,” Physics of Plasmas, 13, 082901–082901–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, S., and Green, P. J. (1997), “On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures With an Unknown Number of Components,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 0, 731–792.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, J., Schiller, S., and Welch, W. (1989), “Designs for Computer Experiments,” Technometrics, 31, 41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stripling, H. F., McClarren, R. G., Kuranz, C. C., Grosskopf, M. J., Rutter, E., and Torralva, B. R. (2013), “A Calibration and Data Assimilation Method Using the Bayesian MARS Emulator,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 52, 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Holst, B., Tóth, G., Sokolov, I. V., Torralva, B. R., Powell, K. G., Drake, R. P., Klapisch, M., Busquet, M., Fryxell, B., and Myra, E. S. (2013), “Simulating Radiative Shocks With the CRASH Laser Package,” High Energy Density Physics, 9, 8–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiu, D. (2007), “Efficient Collocational Approach for Parametric Uncertainty Analysis,” Communications in Computational Physics, 2, 293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiu, D., and Karniadakis, G. E. (2002), “The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations,” SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, 24, 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Qian, P. Z. G., and Zhou, S. (2011), “A Simple Approach to Emulation for Computer Models With Qualitative and Quantitative Factors,” Technometrics, 53, 266–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar