Bayesian Design of Experiments Using Approximate Coordinate Exchange

References

• Amzal, B., Bois, F. Y., Parent, E., and Robert, C. (2006), “Bayesian Optimal Design via Interacting Particle Systems,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 773–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A., Donev, A., and Tobias, R. (2007), Optimum Experimental Design, with SAS, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. C., Chaloner, K., Herzberg, A. M., and Juritz, J. (1993), “Experimental Designs for Properties of a Compartmental Model,” Biometrics, 49, 325–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, L. S., and O’Hagan, A. (2009), “Diagnostics for Gaussian Process Emulators,” Technometrics, 51, 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. I. (1935), “The Calculation of the Dosage-Mortality Curve,” Annals of Applied Biology, 22, 134–167.
   Google Scholar
• Chaloner, K., and Larntz, K. (1989), “Optimal Bayesian Design Applied to Logistic Regression Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 21, 191–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaloner, K., and Verdinelli, I. (1995), “Bayesian Experimental Design: A Review,” Statistical Science, 10, 273–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chkrebtii, O. A., Campbell, D. A., Calderhead, B., and Girolami, M. (2015), “Bayesian Solution Uncertainty Quantification for Differential Equations” (with discussion), Bayesian Analysis, 11, 1239–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, A., Morris, M., Stufken, J., and Bingham, D. (eds.) (2015), Handbook of Design and Analysis of Experiments, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (1987), Practical Methods of Optimization ( 2nd ed.), Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., Dunson, D., Vehtari, A., and Rubin, D. (2014), Bayesian Data Analysis ( 3rd ed.), Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gotwalt, C. M., Jones, B. A., and Steinberg, D. M. (2009), “Fast Computation of Designs Robust to Parameter Uncertainty for Nonlinear Settings,” Technometrics, 51, 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada, M., Martz, H. F., Reese, C. S., and Wilson, A. G. (2001), “Finding Near-Optimal Bayesian Experimental Designs via Genetic Algorithms,” The American Statistician, 55, 175–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan, X., and Marzouk, Y. M. (2013), “Simulation-Based Optimal Bayesian Experimental Design for Nonlinear Systems,” Journal of Computational Physics, 232, 288–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Goldstein, M., Jonathan, P., and Randell, D. (2016), “Bayes Linear Analysis for Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 171, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeppky, J. L., Sacks, J., and Welch, W. J. (2009), “Choosing the Sample Size of a Computer Experiment: A Practical Guide,” Technometrics, 51, 366–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R., and Nachtsheim, C. (1995), “The Coordinate Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs,” Technometrics, 37, 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mira, A., Solgi, R., and Imparato, D. (2013), “Zero Variance Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian Estimators,” Statistics and Computing, 23, 653–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. D., and Mitchell, T. J. (1995), “Exploratory Designs for Computer Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, P. (1999), “Simulation-Based Optimal Design,” in Bayesian Statistics (Vol. 6), eds. J. M. Bernardo, M. J. Bayarri, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, D. Heckerman, and A. F. M. Smith, Oxford, pp. 459–474.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P., and Parmigiani, G. (1996), “Optimal Design via Curve Fitting of Monte Carlo Experiments,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1322–1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, P., Sanso, B., and De Iorio, M. (2004), “Optimal Bayesian Design by Inhomogeneous Markov Chain Simulation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 788–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntzoufras, I., Dellaportas, P., and Forster, J. J. (2003), “Bayesian Variable and Link Determination for Generalised Linear Models,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 111, 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, A., and Forster, J. J. (2004), Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 2B: Bayesian Inference ( 2nd ed.), London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Overstall, A. M., Woods, D. C., and Adamou, M. (2017), Acebayes: Optimal Bayesian Experimental Design Using the ACE Algorithm, R package version 1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Pawitan, Y. (2001), In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pichney, V., Ginsbourger, D., Richet, Y., and Caplin, G. (2013), “Quantile-Based Optimization of Noisy Computer Experiments With Tunable Precision” (with discussion), Technometrics, 55, 2–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. E., and Williams, C. K. I. (2006), Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, B. D. (1987), Stochastic Simulation, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. G., Drovandi, C. C., McGree, J. M., and Pettitt, A. N. (2016), “A Review of Modern Computational Algorithms for Bayesian Optimal Design,” International Statistical Review, 84, 128–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. G., Drovandi, C. C., Thompson, M. H., and Pettitt, A. N. (2014), “Towards Bayesian Experimental Design for Nonlinear Models That Require a Large Number of Sampling Times,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 70, 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. J. (2003), “Estimating Expected Information Gains for Experimental Designs With Application to the Random Fatigue-Limit Model,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 12, 585– 603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., and Notz, W. I. (2003), The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Severini, T. A. (2000), Likelihood Methods in Statistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, T. W., and Woods, D. C. (2015), “Designs for Generalized Linear Models With Random Block Effects via Information Matrix Approximations,” Biometrika, 102, 677–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., and Zhang, L. (2006), “Stochastic Optimization Using Simulated Annealing With Hypothesis Test,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, 174, 1329–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, B. P., Williams, B. J., Anderson-Cook, C. M., and Higdon, D. M. (2016), “Computational Enhancements to Bayesian Design of Experiments Using Gaussian Processes,” Bayesian Analysis, 11, 191– 213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. C., Lewis, S. M., Eccleston, J. A., and Russell, K. G. (2006), “Designs for Generalized Linear Models With Several Variables and Model Uncertainty,” Technometrics, 48, 284– 292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. F. J., and Hamada, M. (2009), Experiments: Planning, Analysis and Optimization ( 2nd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar