References
- Ai, M., Kong, X., and Li, K. (2016), “A General Theory for Orthogonal Array Based Latin Hypercube Sampling,” Statistica Sinica, 26, 761–777.
- Alaeddini, A., Yang, K., Mao, H. J., Murat, A., and Ankenman, B. (2014), “An Adaptive Sequential Experimentation Methodology for Expensive Response Surface Optimization—Case Study in Traumatic Brain Injury Modeling,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30, 767–793.
- Chi, H. M., Beerli, P., Evans, D. W., and Mascagni, M. (2005), “On The Scrambled Sobol Sequence,” in Computational Science, International Conference, Atlanta, USA (Vol. 3516), pp. 775–782.
- Duan, W. T., Bruce, E. A., Susan, M. S., and Paul, J. S. (2017), “Sliced Full Factorial-Based Latin Hypercube Designs as a Framework for a Batch Sequential Design Algorithm,” Technometrics, 59, 11–22.
- He, X., and Qian, P. Z. G. (2011), “Nested Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercube Designs,” Biometrika, 98, 721–731.
- ——— (2016), “A Central Limit Theorem for Nested or Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs,” Statistica Sinica, 26, 1117–1128 DOI:10.5705/ss.202015.0240.
- Johnson, M. E., Moore, L. M., and Ylvisaker, D. (1990), “Minimax and Maximin Distrance Designs,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 26, 131–148.
- Joseph, V. R., and Hung, Y. (2008), “Orthogonal-Maximin Latin Hypercube Designs,” Statistica Sinica, 18, 171–186.
- Joseph, V. R., Dasgupta, T., Tuo, R., and Wu, C. F. J. (2015), “Sequential Exploration of Complex Surfaces Using Minimum Energy Designs,” Technometrics, 57, 64–74.
- Loeppky, J. L., Moore, L. M., and Williams, B. J. (2010), “Batch Sequential Designs for Computer Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140, 1452–1464.
- McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979), “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code,” Technometric, 21, 239–245.
- Morris, M. D., and Mitchell, T. J. (1995), “Exploratory Designs for Computer Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381–402.
- Owen, A. B. (1992), “A Central Limit Theorem for Latin Hypercube Sampling,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 541–551.
- ——— (1994), “Controlling Correlations in Latin Hypercube Samples,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 89, 1517–1522.
- Qian, P. Z. G. (2009), “Nested Latin Hypercube Designs,” Biometrika, 96, 957–970.
- ——— (2012), “Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 107, 393–399.
- Qian, P. Z. G., and Ai, M. (2010), “Nested Lattice Sampling: A New Sampling Scheme Derived by Randomizing Nested Orthogonal Arrays,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 1147–1155.
- Stein, M. (1987), “Large Sample Properties of Simulations Using Latin Hypercube Sampling,” Technometrics, 29, 142–151.
- Steinberg, D. M., and Lin, D. K. J. (2006), “A Construction Method for Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Designs,” Biometrika, 93, 279–288.
- Tang, B. (1993), “Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercubes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1392–1397.
- Xiong, S., Qian, P. Z. G., and Wu, C. F. J. (2013), “Sequential Design and Analysis of High-Accuracy and Low-Accuracy Computer Codes,” Technometrics, 55, 37–46.
- Xu, J., Chen, J., and Qian, P. Z. G. (2015), “Sequentially Refined Latin Hypercube Designs: Reusing Every Point,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110, 1696–1706.
- Yang, J. Y., Liu, M. Q., and Lin, D. K. J. (2014), “Construction of Nested Orthogonal Latin Hypercube Designs,” Statistica Sinica, 24, 211–219.