Split-Plot and Multi-Stratum Designs for Statistical Inference

References

• Borrotti, M., Sambo, F., Mylona, K., and Gilmour, S. G. (2017), “A Multi-Objective Coordinate-Exchange Two-Phase Local Search Algorithm for Multi-Stratum Experiments,” Statistics and Computing, 27, 469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (2007), Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, M. A., Gilmour, S. G., and Trinca, L. A. (2017), “Factorial and Response Surface Designs Robust to Missing Observations,” doi:10.1016/j.csda.2016.05.023
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., and Ware, J. H. (2011), Applied Logitudinal Analysis (2nd ed.), Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmour, S. G., and Goos, P. (2009), “Analysis of Data From Nonorthogonal Multistratum Designs in Industrial Experiments,” Applied Statistics, 58, 467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, S. G., and Trinca, L. A. (2012), “Optimum Design of Experiments for Statistical Inference” (with discussion), Applied Statistics, 61, 345–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, S. G., Goos, P., and Großmann, H. (2017), “Pure Error REML for Analysing Data From Split-Plot and Multi-Stratum Designs,” submitted.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P. (2002), The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and Donev, A. N. (2007), “Tailor-Made Split-Plot Designs With Mixture and Process Variables,” Journal of Quality Technology, 39, 326–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and Gilmour, S. G. (2012), “A General Strategy for Analysing Data From Split-Plot and Multistratum Experimental Designs,” Technometrics, 54, 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and Vandebroek, M. (2003), “D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs With Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots,” Technometrics, 45, 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., Langhans, I., and Vandebroek, M. (2006), “Practical Inference From Industrial Split-Plot Designs,” Journal of Quality Technology, 38, 162–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkelmann, K., and Kempthorne, O. (2005), Design and Analysis of Experiments (vol. 2), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, W. A., and Kowalski, S. M. (2012), “Response Surfaces, Blocking and Split-Plot: An Industrial Experiment Case Study,” Quality Engineering, 24, 531–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. (2013), “Comment: Enhancing the Search for Compromise Designs,” Technometrics, 55, 278–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and Goos, P. (2007), “A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs,” Applied Statistics, 56, 347–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2009), “D-Optimal Design of Split-Split-Plot Experiments,” Biometrika, 96, 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), “I-Optimal Versus D-Optimal Split-Plot Response Surface Designs,” Journal of Quality Technology, 44, 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and Nachtsheim, C. (2009), “Split-Plot Designs: What, Why, and How,” Journal of Quality Technology, 41, 340–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2011), “Efficient Designs With Minimal Aliasing,” Technometrics, 53, 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, S. M., Cornell, J. A., and Vining, G. G. (2002), “Split-Plot Designs and Estimation Methods for Mixture Experiments With Process Variables,” Technometrics, 44, 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latif, A. H. M. M., and Gilmour, S. G. (2015), “Transform-Both-Sides Nonlinear Models for in vitro Pharmacokinetic Experiments,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 24, 306–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letsinger, J. D., Myers, R. H., and Lentner, M. (1996), “Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures,” Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Anderson-Cook, C., and Robinson, T. J. (2011), “Optimization of Designed Experiments Based on Multiple Criteria Utilizing a Pareto Frontier,” Technometrics, 54, 353–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharia, H., and Goos, P. (2010), “D-Optimal and D-Efficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs,” Journal of Quality Technology, 42, 358–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., and Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009), Response Surface Methodology (3rd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mylona, K., Goos, P., and Jones, B. (2014), “Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments for Fixed Effects and Variance Component Estimation,” Technometrics, 56, 132–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N.-K., and Pham, T.-D. (2015), “Searching for D-Efficient Equivalent-Estimation Second-Order Split-Plot Designs,” Journal of Quality Technology, 47, 54–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bornkamp, B., Glimm, E., and Bretz, F. (2014), “Model-Based Dose Finding Under Model Uncertainty Using General Parametric Models,” Statistics in Medicine, 33, 1646–1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambo, F., Borrotti, M., and Mylona, K. (2014), “A Coordinate Exchange Two-Phase Local Search Algorithm for the D- and I-Optimal Designs of Split-Plot Experiments,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 71, 1193–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinca, L. A., and Gilmour, S. G. (2001), “Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs,” Technometrics, 43, 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2015), “Improved Split-Plot and Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs,” Technometrics, 57, 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G., and Kowalski, S. M. (2008), “Exact Inference for Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure,” Journal of Quality Technology, 40, 394–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G., Kowalski, S. M., and Montgomery, D. C. (2005), “Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure,” Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar