Optimal Blocked and Split-Plot Designs Ensuring Precise Pure-Error Estimation of the Variance Components

References

• Arnouts, H., and Goos, P. (2012), “Staggered-Level Designs for Experiments With More Than One Hard-to-Change Factor,” Technometrics, 54, 355–366. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2012.715834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. C., Donev, A. N., and Tobias, R. D. (2007), Optimum Experimental Designs, With SAS, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliemer, M. C. J., Rose, J. M., and Hess, S. (2009), “Approximation of Bayesian Efficiency in Experimental Choice Designs,” Journal of Choice Modeling, 1, 98–127. DOI: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70024-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (2007), Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Wulff, S. S., and Robinson, T. J. (2017), “DP-Optimality in Terms of Multiple Criteria and Its Application to the Split-Plot Design,” Journal of Quality Technology, 49, 27–45. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2017.11918183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaloner, K., and Larntz, K. (1989), “Optimal Bayesian Design Applied to Logistic Regression Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 21, 191–208. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(89)90004-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-S. (1995), “Optimal Regression Designs Under Random Block-Effects Models,” Statistica Sinica, 5, 485–497. DOI: 10.5705/ss.202017.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, S. G., Goos, P., and Grossmann, H. (2019), “Pure Error REML for Analyzing Data From Split-Plot and Multi-Stratum Designs,” under revision.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmour, S. G., and Trinca, L. A. (2000), “Some Practical Advice on Polynomial Regression Analysis From Blocked Response Surface Designs,” Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 29, 2157–2180. DOI: 10.1080/03610920008832601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, S. G., and Trinca, L. A. (2012), “Optimum Design of Experiments for Statistical Inference” (with discussion), Applied Statistics, 61, 345–401. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.01000.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P. (2006), “Optimal Versus Orthogonal and Equivalent-Estimation Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments,” Statistica Neerlandica, 60, 361–378. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2006.00333.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and Donev, A. N. (2007a), “D-Optimal Minimum Support Mixture Designs in Blocks,” Metrika, 65, 53–68. DOI: 10.1007/s00184-006-0059-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and Donev, A. N. (2007b), “Tailor-Made Split-Plot Designs With Mixture and Process Variables,” Journal of Quality Technology, 39, 326–339. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2007.11917699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and Gilmour, S. G. (2017), “Testing for Lack of Fit in Blocked, Split-Plot, and Other Multi-stratum Designs,” Journal of Quality Technology, 49, 320–336. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2017.11918000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., Langhans, I., and Vandebroek, M. (2006), “Practical Inference From Industrial Split-Plot Designs,” Journal of Quality Technology, 38, 162–179. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2006.11918603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and Mylona, K. (2018), “Quadrature Methods for Bayesian Optimal Design of Experiments With Nonnormal Prior Distributions,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 27, 179–194. DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2017.1285778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and Goos, P. (2007), “A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 56, 347–364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2007.00581.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, S. M., Cornell, J. A., and Vining, G. G. (2002), “Split-Plot Designs and Estimation Methods for Mixture Experiments With Process Variables,” Technometrics, 44, 72–79. DOI: 10.1198/004017002753398344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, S. M., Vining, G. G., Montgomery, D. C., and Borror, C. M. (2006), “Modifying a Central Composite Design to Model the Process Mean and Variance When There Are Hard-to-Change Factors,” Applied Statistics, 55, 615–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letsinger, J. D., Myers, R. H., and Lentner, M. (1996), “Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures,” Journal of Quality Technology, 28, 381–397. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1996.11979697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. K., and Nachtsheim, C. J. (1995), “The Coordinate-Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs,” Technometrics, 37, 60–69. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1995.10485889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylona, K., Goos, P., and Jones, B. (2014), “Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments for Fixed Effects and Variance Component Estimation,” Technometrics, 56, 132–144. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2013.818579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, P. A., Kowalski, S. M., and Vining, G. G. (2006), “Classes of Split-Plot Response Surface Designs for Equivalent Estimation,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22, 291–305. DOI: 10.1002/qre.771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, S. R., Casella, G., and McCulloch, C. E. (1992), Variance Components, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Trinca, L. A., and Gilmour, S. G. (2017), “Split-Plot and Multi-stratum Designs for Statistical Inference,” Technometrics, 59, 446–457. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2017.1316315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, G. G., Kowalski, S. M., and Montgomery, D. C. (2005), “Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure,” Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 115–129. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2005.11980310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. F. J., and Hamada, M. (2009), Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., Goos, P., and Vandebroek, M. (2010), “Comparing Different Sampling Schemes for Approximating the Integrals Involved in the Efficient Design of Stated Choice Experiments,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44, 1268–1289. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar