Feature Detection and Hypothesis Testing for Extremely Noisy Nanoparticle Images using Topological Data Analysis

References

• Anai, H., Chazal, F., Glisse, M., Ike, Y., Inakoshi, H., Tinarrage, R., and Umeda, Y. (2020), “DTM-based Filtrations,” in Topological Data Analysis, eds. Baas, N. A., Carlsson, G. E., Quick, G., Szymik, M., and Thaule, M., pp. 33–66, Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Atienza, N., González-Díaz, R., and Soriano-Trigueros, M. (2020), “On the Stability of Persistent Entropy and New Summary Functions for Topological Data Analysis,” Pattern Recognition, 107, 107509. DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995), “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289–300. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., and Yekutieli, D. (2001), “The Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing Under Dependency,” The Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165–1188. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1013699998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, E., Chen, Y.-C., Cisewski-Kehe, J., and Fasy, B. T. (2020), “Functional Summaries of Persistence Diagrams,” Journal of Applied and Computational Topology, 4, 211–262. DOI: 10.1007/s41468-020-00048-w.
   Google Scholar
• Biscio, C. A., and Møller, J. (2019), “The Accumulated Persistence Function, A New Useful Functional Summary Statistic for Topological Data Analysis, with a View to Brain Artery Trees and Spatial Point Process Applications,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 28, 671–681. DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2019.1573686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg, A. J., Gal, I., Mandell, M. A., and Pancia, M. (2014), “Robust Statistics, Hypothesis Testing, and Confidence Intervals for Persistent Homology on Metric Measure Spaces,” Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 14, 745–789. DOI: 10.1007/s10208-014-9201-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissonnat, J.-D., Chazal, F., and Yvinec, M. (2018). Geometric and Topological Inference (Vol. 57), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, G., and Vejdemo-Johansson, M. (2022), Topological Data Analysis with Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cericola, C., Johnson, I. J., Kiers, J., Krock, M., Purdy, J., and Torrence, J. (2017), “Extending Hypothesis Testing with Persistent Homology to Three or More Groups,” Involve, a Journal of Mathematics, 11, 27–51. DOI: 10.2140/involve.2018.11.27.
   Google Scholar
• Chazal, F., and Michel, B. (2021), “An Introduction to Topological Data Analysis: Fundamental and Practical Aspects for Data Scientists,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 667963. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2021.667963.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, X., Chen, D., Weng, M., Jiang, Y., Wei, G. W., and Pan, F. (2020), “Topology-Based Machine Learning Strategy for Cluster Structure Prediction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 11, 4392–4401. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintakunta, H., Gentimis, T., Gonzalez-Diaz, R., Jimenez, M.-J., and Krim, H. (2015), “An Entropy-based Persistence Barcode,” Pattern Recognition, 48, 391–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.-M., and Day, S. (2018), “Topological Fidelity and Image Thresholding: A Persistent Homology Approach,” Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 60, 1167–1179. DOI: 10.1007/s10851-018-0802-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.-M., Day, S., and Hu, C.-S. (2022), “A Multi-Parameter Persistence Framework for Mathematical Morphology,” Scientific Reports, 12, 6427. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09464-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Steiner, D., Edelsbrunner, H., and Harer, J. (2007), “Stability of Persistence Diagrams,” Discrete and Computational Geometry, 37, 103–120. DOI: 10.1007/s00454-006-1276-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Steiner, D., Edelsbrunner, H., Harer, J., and Mileyko, Y. (2010), “Lipschitz Functions have lp-Stable Persistence,” Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 10, 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DasGupta, A. (2011), Probability for Statistics and Machine Learning: Fundamentals and Advanced Topics, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A. C., and Hinkley, D. V. (1997), Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dłotko, P. (2015), “Cubical Complex,” in GUDHI User and Reference Manual. GUDHI Editorial Board.
   Google Scholar
• Edelsbrunner, Letscher, and Zomorodian (2002), “Topological Persistence and Simplification,” Discrete & Computational Geometry, 28(4):511–533. DOI: 10.1007/s00454-002-2885-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelsbrunner, H., and Harer, J. (2010), Computational Topology: An Introduction, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Egerton, R. (2013), “Control of Radiation Damage in the TEM,” Ultramicroscopy, 127, 100–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egerton, R. (2019), “Radiation Damage to Organic and Inorganic Specimens in the TEM,” Micron, 119, 72–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2019.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egerton, R., Li, P., and Malac, M. (2004), “Radiation Damage in the TEM and SEM,” Micron, 35, 399–409. DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faruqi, A., and McMullan, G. (2018), “Direct Imaging Detectors for Electron Microscopy,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 878, 180–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.07.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasy, B. T., Lecci, F., Rinaldo, A., Wasserman, L., Balakrishnan, S., and Singh, A. (2014), “Confidence Sets for Persistence Diagrams,” The Annals of Statistics, 42, 2301–2339. DOI: 10.1214/14-AOS1252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garin, A., Heiss, T., Maggs, K., Bleile, B., and Robins, V. (2020), “Duality in Persistent Homology of Images,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04597.
   Google Scholar
• Garin, A., and Tauzin, G. (2019), “A Topological ’Reading’ Lesson: Classification of MNIST using TDA,” Proceedings - 18th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA 2019, pp. 1551–1556.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, S. (2013), “The Shapely User Manual,” https://pypi.org/project/Shapely.
   Google Scholar
• Illian, J., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H., and Stoyan, D. (2008), Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns (Vol. 70), Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Chen, D., Chen, X., Li, T., Wei, G. W., and Pan, F. (2021), “Topological Representations of Crystalline Compounds for the Machine-Learning Prediction of Materials Properties,” NPJ Computational Materials, 7, 1–8. DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00493-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczynski, T., Mischaikow, K., and Mrozek, M. (2006), Computational Homology (Vol. 157), New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, H., Akakin, H. C., and Sarma, S. E. (2013), “A Generalized Laplacian of Gaussian Filter for Blob Setection and its Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 43, 1719–1733. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2228639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalevsky, V. (1989), “Finite Topology as Applied to Image Analysis,” Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 46, 141–161. DOI: 10.1016/0734-189X(89)90165-5.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, E. L., Levin, B. D., Boland, T., Chang, S. L., and Crozier, P. A. (2021), “Atomic Scale Characterization of Fluxional Cation Behavior on Nanoparticle Surfaces: Probing Oxygen Vacancy Creation/Annihilation at Surface Sites,” ACS Nano, 15, 2624–2634. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c07584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, E. L., Levin, B. D., Miller, B. K., and Crozier, P. A. (2019), “Approaches to Exploring Spatio-Temporal Surface Dynamics in Nanoparticles with in situ Transmission Electron Microscopy,” Microscopy and Microanalysis, 2, 86–94. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927619015228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A., Hoffman, T., Chung, Y.-M., Keegan, K., and Day, S. (2021), “A Density-based Approach to Feature Detection in Persistence Diagrams for Firn Data,” Foundations of Data Science, 4, 623–639. DOI: 10.3934/fods.2021012.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. D. (2021), “Direct Detectors and their Applications in Electron Microscopy for Materials Science,” Journal of Physics: Materials, 4, 042005. DOI: 10.1088/2515-7639/ac0ff9.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. D., Lawrence, E. L., and Crozier, P. A. (2020), “Tracking the Picoscale Spatial Motion of Atomic Columns During Dynamic Structural Change,” Ultramicroscopy, 213, 112978. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.112978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeberg, T. (1998), “Feature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection,” International Journal of Computer Vision, 30, 79–116. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008045108935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzorro, R., Xu, Y., Vincent, J. L., Rivera, R., Matteson, D. S., and Crozier, P. A. (2022), “Exploring Blob Detection to Determine Atomic Column Positions and Intensities in Time-Resolved TEM Images with Ultra-Low Signal-to-Noise,” Microscopy and Microanalysis, 28, 1–14. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927622000356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massart, P. (1990), “The Tight Constant in the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz Inequality,” The Annals of Probability, 18, 1269–1283. DOI: 10.1214/aop/1176990746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischaikow, K., and Nanda, V. (2013), “Morse Theory for Filtrations and Efficient Computation of Persistent Homology,” Discrete & Computational Geometry, 50, 330–353. DOI: 10.1007/s00454-013-9529-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, S., Manzorro, R., Vincent, J. L., Tang, B., Sheth, D. Y., Simoncelli, E. P., Matteson, D. S., Crozier, P. A., and Fernandez-Granda, C. (2022), “Deep Denoising for Scientific Discovery: A Case Study in Electron Microscopy,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 8, 585–597. DOI: 10.1109/TCI.2022.3176536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, F. C., Neville, R., Shipman, P. D., Pearson, D. A., and Bradley, R. M. (2018), “Measures of Order for Nearly Hexagonal Lattices,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 380–381, 17–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2018.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, D., Miao, L., Stone, G., and Alem, N. (2020), “mpfit: A Robust Method for Fitting Atomic Resolution Images with Multiple Gaussian Peaks,” Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging, 6, 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s40679-020-0068-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myllymäki, M., Mrkvička, T., Grabarnik, P., Seijo, H., and Hahn, U. (2017), “Global Envelope Tests for Spatial Processes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 79, 381–404. DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12172.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, T., Hiraoka, Y., Hirata, A., Escolar, E. G., and Nishiura, Y. (2015), “Persistent Homology and Many-Body Atomic Structure for Medium-Range Order in the Glass,” Nanotechnology, 26, 304001. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/30/304001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord, M., Vullum, P. E., MacLaren, I., Tybell, T., and Holmestad, R. (2017), “Atomap: A New Software Tool for the Automated Analysis of Atomic Resolution Images Using Two-Dimensional Gaussian Fitting,” Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging, 3, 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s40679-017-0042-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rieck, B., Yates, T., Bock, C., Borgwardt, K., Wolf, G., Turk-Browne, N., and Krishnaswamy, S. (2020), “Uncovering the Topology of Time-Varying fMRI Data using Cubical Persistence,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Vol. 33), pp. 6900–6912.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., and Turner, K. (2017), “Hypothesis Testing for Topological Data Analysis,” Journal of Applied and Computational Topology, 1, 241–261. DOI: 10.1007/s41468-017-0008-7.
   Google Scholar
• Rucco, M., Castiglione, F., Merelli, E., and Pettini, M. (2016), “Characterisation of the Idiotypic Immune Network through Persistent Entropy,” in Proceedings of ECCS 2014, pp. 117–128, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruskin, R. S., Yu, Z., and Grigorieff, N. (2013), “Quantitative Characterization of Electron Detectors for Transmission Electron Microscopy,” Journal of Structural Biology, 184, 385–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skraba, P., and Turner, K. (2022), “Wasserstein Stability for Persistence Diagrams.” arXiv:2006.16824.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. E., Worsley, K., and Gosselin, F. (2007), “Maxima of Discretely Sampled Random Fields, with an Application to ’bubbles’,” Biometrika, 94, 1–18. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asm004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkes, R., Nys, J., Verdonck, T., and Latre, S. (2021), “Noise Robustness of Persistent Homology on Greyscale Images, Across Filtrations and Signatures,” PloS One, 16, 1–26. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejdemo-Johansson, M., and Mukherjee, S. (2022), “Multiple Hypothesis Testing with Persistent Homology,” Foundations of Data Science, 4, 667–705. DOI: 10.3934/fods.2022018.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. L., and Crozier, P. A. (2021), “Atomic Level Fluxional Behavior and Activity of CeO2-Supported pt Catalysts for co Oxidation,” Nature Communications, 12, 1–13. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26047-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, H., Chen, C., and Vuçini, E. (2012), “Efficient Computation of Persistent Homology for Cubical Data,” in Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization II, eds. R. Peikert, H. Hauser, H. Carr, and R. Fuchs, pp. 91–106, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar