Development and validation of multi-residue method for determination of 412 pesticide residues in cotton fiber using GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS

References

• Alder, L., Greulich, K., Kempe, G., & Vieth, B. R. (2006). Residue analysis of 500 high priority pesticides: Better by GC–MS or LC–MS/MS? Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 25, 838–865. doi:10.1002/mas.20091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APC-Egypt. (2016). The approved recommendations for controlling of the Egyptian agricultural pests. Egyptian Agricultural Pesticide Committee. Retrieved from http://www.agr-egypt.gov.eg/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Barker, T. B., & Milivojevich, A.. (2016). Quality by experimental design (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baynes, R. E., & Riviere, J. E. (2001). Chapter (22) Pesticide disposition: Dermal absorption. In R. I. Krieger & W. C. Krieger (Eds.), Handbook of pesticide toxicology principles (pp. 515–530). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baynes, R. E., & Riviere, J. E. (2012). Chapter (3) Absorption. In E. Hodgson (Ed.), Pesticide biotransformation and disposition (pp. 25–52). Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-385481-0.00003-4
   Google Scholar
• CAC. (2016). CAC MRLs database. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/standards/pesticide-mrls/en/
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Zhu, F., Zeng, F., Ouyang, G., Ruan, W., Liu, L., & Lai, R.. (2013). Determination of organochlorine pesticides in textiles using solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Microchemical Journal, 110, 280–284. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Chena, G., Qiu, J., Jiang, R., Zeng, F., Zhua, F., & Ouyang, G. (2016). Hollow fiber based liquid phase microextraction for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in ecological textiles by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Talanta, 146, 375–380. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2015.08.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campiche, J., Boyd, S., & Huffman, M. (2016). The economic outlook for U.S. cotton. Cordova, TN: National Cotton Council of America.
   Google Scholar
• CENELEC, & CEN. (2005). EN ISO/IEC 17025 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Dix, K. J. (2001). Chapter (24) Absorption, distribution, and pharmacokinetics. In R. Krieger (Ed.), Handbook of pesticide toxicology (Vol. 1, Principles, pp. 563–582). London: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012426260-7.50027-6
   Google Scholar
• Dochia, M., Sirghie, C., Kozłowski, R. M., & Roskwitalski, Z. (2012). Chapter (2) Cotton fibers. In Handbook of natural fibers: Types, properties, and factors affecting breeding and cultivation (Vol. 1, pp. 11–23). Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Elsevier.10.1533/9780857095503.1.9
   Google Scholar
• Easter, E. P., Leonas, K. K., & DeJonge, J. O. (1983). A reproducible method for the extraction of pesticide residues from fabrics. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 31, 738–744.10.1007/BF01606054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EJF. (2007). The deadly chemicals in cotton. London: Environmental Justice Foundation in collaboration with Pesticide Action Network UK.
   Google Scholar
• El-Nagar, K., Shehata, A. B., Schantz, M., & Porter, B. (2005). Extraction of residual chlorinated pesticides from cotton matrix as part of a certification method for cotton reference material. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 44, 1257–1267. doi:10.1080/03602550500207782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Engelen, J.G.M., & Prud’homme de Lodder, L. C. H. (2004). Non-food products: How to assess children’s exposure? (pp. 2–75). Bilthoven, Holland: The Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS).
   Google Scholar
• EU Pesticide MRLs Database. (2016). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/max_residue_levels/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• EU-Ecolabel. (1999). Establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the community eco-label to textile products. Official Journal of the European Communities. (notified under document number C(1999) 339) (1999/178/EC)
   Google Scholar
• EU-Ecolabel. (2014). EU Ecolabel user manual of commission decision for textile products (2014/350/EU) (pp. 1–214). Retrieved from www.ecolabel.eu.
   Google Scholar
• European Reference Laboratory Datapool website. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.eurl-pesticides-test.eu/
   Google Scholar
• GAFI. (2014). General Authority for Investment and Free Zones-Textiles and Ready Made Garments (RMG) Sector Overview Report. Cairo, Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. (2009). Identifying plant fibers in textiles: The case of cotton. Identification of Textile Fibers, 84, 239–258. doi:10.1533/9781845695651.3.239
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S., & Hsieh, Y.-L. (Eds.). (2007a). Part (1) Chemical structure and properties of cotton. In Cotton: Science and technology (pp. 3–30). Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S., & Hsieh, Y.-L. (Eds.). (2007b). Part (13) Controlling costs in cotton production. In Cotton: Science and technology (pp. 425–459). Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Guideline on procedural manual, Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). (2015, 24th ed.). FAO and WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, S. Z. U. (2014). Identification of risk concentrations of hazardous compounds on textiles ( thesis). The Technical university of Liberec, Liberec.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, K. L., Markee, N. L., & Maibach, H. I. (1992). Skin response to fabric. A review of studies and assessment methods. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10, 54–63. doi:10.1177/0887302x9201000409
   Google Scholar
• Kljun, A., El-Dessouky, H. M., Benians, T. A. S., Goubet, F., Meulewaeter, F., Knox, J. P., & Blackburn, R. S. (2014). Analysis of the physical properties of developing cotton fibers. European Polymer Journal, 51, 57–68. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koesukwiwat, U., Lehotay, S. J., & Leepipatpiboon, N. (2011). Fast, low-pressure gas chromatography triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry for analysis of 150 pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218, 7039–7050. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.07.094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranthi, K.R., & Russell, D. A. (2009). Chapter (17) Changing trends in cotton pest management. In D. Pimentel & R. Peshin (Eds.), Integrated pest management: Innovation-development process (Vol. 1, pp. 499–541). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.10.1007/978-1-4020-8992-3
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. M., Kafle, K., Belias, D. W., Park, Y. B., Glick, R. E., Haigler, C. H., & Kim, S. H. (2015). Comprehensive analysis of cellulose content, crystallinity, and lateral packing in Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense cotton fibers using sum frequency generation, infrared and Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. Cellulose, 22, 971–989. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0535-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehotay, S. J., Mastovska, K., & Lightfield, A. R. (2005). Use of buffering and other means to improve results of problematic pesticides in a fast and easy method for residue analysis of fruits and vegetables. Journal of AOAC International, 88, 615–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, B., & Örnemar k. (Eds.). (2014). Eurachem guide: The fitness for purpose of analytical methods – A laboratory guide to method validation and related topics (2nd ed.), ISBN 978-91-87461-59-0. Retrieved from www.eurachem.org
   Google Scholar
• Małgorzata, S., Paryjczak, T., Sypniewski, S., Rybicki, E., Święch, T., … Albińska, J. (2004). Changes in hazardous substances in cotton after mechanical and chemical treatments of textiles. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 12, 1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Bouvyer, G., Linh, P. D., Tuan, L. C., Barin, C., Khanh, N. B., Hoa, D. Q., … Binh, T. V. (1983). Epidermic of haemorrhagic disease in Vietnamese infants caused by warfarin-contaminated talcs. The Lancet, 321, 230–232. 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92600-4
   Google Scholar
• Michelangelo Anastassiades, & Lehotay, S. J. (2003). Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction”, for the determination of pesticide residues in product. Journal of AOAC International, 86, 412–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugesh, B. K., Selvadass, M., Somashekar, R., Niranjana, A. R., & Samir O. M. (2012). Structural characteristics of conventional and organic cotton fibers using WAXS data. International Journal of Carbohydrate Research, 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Niessen, W. M. A., Manini, P., & Andreoli, R. (2006). Matrix effects in quantitative pesticide analysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 25, 881–899. doi:10.1002/mas.20097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obendorf, S. K., Love, A. M., & Knox, T. (1994). Use of a crocking test method to measure the transfer of pesticide from contaminated clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12, 41–45.10.1177/0887302X9401200307
   Google Scholar
• OEKO-TEX. (Edition 2015). Testing procedures for authorization to use the OEKO-TEX® standard 100 mark. Retrieved from https://www.oeko-tex.com/media/init_data/downloads/Testing%20procedures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OEKO-TEX. (Edition 01/2015). Oeko-Tex standard 100-general and special conditions. Retrieved from http://www.oeko-tex.com
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, N., & Yang, Y. (2009). Properties and potential applications of natural cellulose fibers from the bark of cotton stalks. Bioresource Technology, 100, 3563–3569. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. D., Norred, W. P., Bathija, A., & Ulsamer, A. G. (1984). Bioavailability in rabbits of formaldehyde from durable-press textiles. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 14, 453–463.10.1080/15287398409530592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagar, D. R. A. B. (2014). Insecticide resistance in cotton leafhopper, amrasca biguttula biguttula (ISHIDA) – A review. Biochemical and Cellular Archives, 14, 283–294.
   Google Scholar
• SANTE/11945/2015. (2015/2016). A guidance document on analytical quality control and method validation procedures for pesticides residues analysis in food and feed. Brussels: European commission.
   Google Scholar
• Syed Zameer Ul, H., & Militky, J. (2012). Acetylcholinesterase based detection of residual pesticides on cotton. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 3, 93–98. doi:10.4236/ajac.2012.32013
   Google Scholar
• Taha, S. M. (2016). A rapid gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for multi-residue analysis of 212 pesticides in chamomile. Journal for Research Analysis, 2, 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• U.S., & EPA. (1996). Determination of organochlorine pesticides By GC-ECD ( US EPA the method 8081 A). Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/8081b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xianlei, Hu, Zhang, Mingqiu, Ruan, Wenhong, Zhu, Fang, & Ouyang, G. (2012). Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in ecological textiles by SPME with a siloxane-modified polyurethane acrylic resin fiber. Analytica Chimica Acta, 736, 62–68. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2012.05.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zameer Ul Hassan, S., Militky, J., & Krejci, J. (2013, June 9–11). A qualitative study of residual pesticides on cotton fibers. Paper presented at the Conference Papers in Science, Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., MingtaiWang, Z. S., Li, A., Liming, X., Jun, M., & Lu, L. (2007). Multiresidue determination of 77 pesticides in textiles by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 45, 375–399.10.1093/chromsci/45.7.375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar