Visual aesthetic perception of handwoven cotton fabrics

References

• Alimma, D., Matsio, T., Nakajima, M., & Takahashi, T. (2000). Sensory measurements of the main mechanical parameters of knitted fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 70, 985–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton, D., Chin, C., & Abdi, H. (2015). DiSTATIS three way metric multidimensional scaling. R package version 1.0. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DistatisR.
   Google Scholar
• Bensaid, S., Osselin, J. F., Schacher, L., & Adolphe, D. (2006). The effect of pattern construction on the tactile feeling evaluated through sensory analysis. Journal of the Textile Institute, 97(2), 137–145. doi:10.1533/joti.2005.0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaid, S., Schacher, L., & Adolphe, D. (2008). Touch and sight interaction in fabric sensory analysis, Tekstil. Journal of Textile Clothing & Technology, 57, 383–389.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. P. (1996). Fabrics: Sensory and mechanical properties. Textile Progress, 26(3), 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Blijlevens, J., Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2009). How consumers perceive product appearance: Identification of three product appearance attributes. International Journal of Design, 3, 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, R. H. (1964). Measurement of fabric aesthetics analysis of aesthetic components. Textile Research Journal, 34(9), 791–804.
   Google Scholar
• Cardello, A. V., Winterhalter, C., & Schutz, H. G. (2003). Predicting the handle and comfort of military clothing fabrics from sensory and instrument data: Development and application of new psychophysical methods. Textile Research Journal, 73(3), 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choungourian, A. (1969). Color preference: A cross-cultural and cross-sectional study. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 28(3), 801–802. doi:10.2466/pms.1969.28.3.801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A., Tax, S. J. E. T., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2000). Designing products with added emotional value: Development and application of an approach for research through design. The Design Journal, 4, 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and application of correspondence analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M., Nenadic, O., & Friendly, M. (2016). Simple, multiple and joint correspondence analysis. R package version 0.70. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ca.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K. A., Chen, L. L., Wang, C., & Tsang, H. (2006). Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(6), 553–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. M. (1965). Measuring the aesthetic appeal of textiles. Textile Research Journal, 35(5), 428–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlbert, A. C., & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current Biology, 17, 623–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. (2008). 11664-4 (CIE S 014-4/E) Colorimetry Part 4: CIE 1976 L*a*b* Colour Space.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, M., Fritz, A., Dhingra, R., & Postle, R. (1992). A psychological evaluation of the tactile qualities of hand knitting yarns. Textile Research Journal, 62(10), 557–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. W., & Servaes, M. (1995). Pleasure in product use: Beyond usability. In S. Robertson (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics 1995. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kanai, H., Morishima, M., Nasu, K., Nishimatsu, T., Shibata, K., & Matsuoka, T. (2011). Identification of principal factor of fabric aesthetics by the evaluation from experts on textiles and from untrained consumer. Textile Research Journal, 81(12), 1216–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata, S. (1980). The standardization and analysis of hand evaluation (2nd ed.). Osaka: The Textile Machinery Society of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kawabata, S., & Niwa, M. (1989). Fabric performance in clothing and clothing manufacture. Journal of the Textile Institute, 80(1), 19–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata, S., & Niwa, M. (1991). Objective measurement of fabric mechanical property and quality: Its application to textile and clothing manufacture. International Journal of Clothing Science & Technology, 3(1), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kitaguchi, S., Kumazawa, M., Morita, H., Endo, M., Sato, T., & Sukigara, S. (2015). Fabric hand, quality, aesthetic, and preference of textiles through sensory evaluation. Journal of the Textile Engineering, 61(3), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling, Sage University Paper series on quantitative application in the social sciences 07–11. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest: Test in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-33. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. (2017). Least-squares means. R package version 2.26-3. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lsmeans.
   Google Scholar
• Mahar, T. J., Wang, H., & Postle, R. (2013). A review of fabric tactile properties and their subjective assessment for next-to-skin knitted fabrics. Journal of the Textile Institute, 104(6), 572–589. doi:10.1080/00405000.2013.774947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, M. P., Ahmed- Kristensen, S., Brockhoff, P. B., & Yanagisawa, H. (2016). Investigating the influence of product perception and geometric features. Research Engineering & Design. doi:10.1007/s00163-016-0244-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C., Jones, A. L., & Cottrell, J. (1981). The aesthetics of color. Perception, 10(6), 651–666. doi:10.1068/p100651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, T., & Endo, Y. (1999). Evaluation of the visual texture and aesthetic appearance of lace patterns. Journal of the Texttile Institute, 90(1), 100–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ou, L.-C., Luo, M. R., Woodcock, A. E., & Wright, A. (2004). A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: Colour emotions for single colours. Color Research & Application, 29(3), 232–240. doi: 10.1002/col.20010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbeeke, C. J., & Hekkert, P. (1999). Proceeding of the first international conference on design and emotion. Department of Industrial Design, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 77–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoophat, P., & Sukigara, S. (2016). Mechanical and surface properties of Thai cotton hand-woven fabric made from hand-spun and machine-spun yarns. Journal of Textile Science & Engineering, 6, 263. doi:10.4172/2165-8064.1000263.
   Google Scholar
• Phoophat, P., Sukigara, S., & Yamamoto, H. (2018). “Cross-material” texture perception: An exploratory analysis of woven fabrics and tree barks. Journal of Textile Science & Engineering, 64(1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, M. (1994). A cross-cultural study on color preference in three Asian cities: Comparison between Tokyo, Taipei and Tianjin. Japanese Psychological Research, 36(4), 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Breemen, E. J. J., Knoop, W. G., Horvath, I., Vergeest, J. S. M., & Pham, B. (1998). Developing a methodology for design for aesthetics based on analogy of communication. Proceedings of 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. H. Jr., (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar