Cotton stickiness before and after saw ginning

References

• Abidi, N. (2007). Caractérisation de la structure et modification de la surface des macromolécules inorganiques et biologiques: synthèse des travaux. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Haute Alsace.
   Google Scholar
• Abidi, N., & Hequet, E. (2004). Analysis of sticky cotton yarn defects by scanning electron microscopy, textile topics 4.
   Google Scholar
• Abidi, N., & Hequet, E. (2007). Fourier transform infrared analysis of cotton contamination. Textile Research Journal, 77(2), 77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, W. S. (2000). Prediction of stickiness of selected cotton samples. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Volume 2: 1514-1515), National Cotton Council.
   Google Scholar
• Brashears, A. D., Baker, R. V. (2000). Comparison of finger strippers, Brush roll strippers and spindle Pickers on the Texas high plains. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 452–453).
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, G. A., & Mohamed, A. (1986). Economic analyses of cotton insect control in the Sudan Gezira. Crop Protection, 5(5), 348–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, D. T. W. (2002). The relationship between cotton stickiness and cotton dust potential. Journal of Cotton Science, 6(4), 126-132.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., Tronstad, R., Leser, J., Goodell, P. B., Godfrey, L. D., Henneberry, T. J., Hendrix, D., Brushwood, D., Naranjo, S. E., Castle, S., & Nichols, R. L. (1999). Sticky cotton sources and solutions. The University of Arizona, Cooperative Extension. Publication, IPM series No. 13. AZ1156-12/1999
   Google Scholar
• Elsner, O., Hani, J., & Lubenevskaya, E. (1983). The sugar content in lint of growing bolls. Coton et Fibres Tropicales 38, 223–227.
   Google Scholar
• Frydrych, R. F., Tamime, O., Jean-Paul, G., & Eric, G. (2000). Sticky cotton effects on the carded spinning process. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San-Antonio (Etats-Unis), 4-8 January 2000. Memphis: NCCA, Résumé, p. 1517.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlot, J.-P., Drieling, A., Qaud, M., Gordon, S., Knowlton, J., Matusiak, M., van der Sluijs, M., Martin, V., Froese, K., & Delhom, C. (2020). Interpretation and use of instrument measured cotton characteristics. A guide by ICAC task force on commercial standardization of instrument testing of cotton (CSITC) and by ITMF international committee on cotton testing methods (ICCTM), version, 1.0, p. 75.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlot, J.-P., Lassus, S. & Gawrysiak, (2016). International round-test on stickiness measuring methods: New results and proposal for an harmonization step forward. International textile manufacturers federation (ITMF), International cotton committee on testing methods (ICCTM), Stickiness session. 33rd International cotton conference Bremen, March 16-18, 2016. Town Hall of Bremen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, D. L. (1999). Sugar composition of cotton aphid and silverleaf whitefly honeydews. In P. Dugger and D. Richter (Eds.), Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences, January 3–7, 1999, Orlando, FL, pp. 47–51. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, D. L., Wei, Y. -A, and Legett, J. E. (1992). Homopteran honeydew sugar composition is determined by both the insect and the plant species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, 1001B(1/2), 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hequet, E., & Abidi, N. (2002). High-Speed Stickiness Detector Measurement: Effect of Temperature Settings and Relative Humidity. The Journal of Cotton Science, 6, 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hequet, E. F., Abidi, N., & Ethridge, D. (2005). Processing sticky cotton: Effect of stickiness on yarn quality. Textile Research Journal, 75(5), 402–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hequet, E., Henneberry, T. J., & Nichols, R. L. (2007). Sticky cotton: Causes, effects, and prevention. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Technical bulletin. Number 1915
   Google Scholar
• Hequet, E., & Frydrych, R. (1992). Sticky Cotton from Plant to Yarn. In New Methods to Test Stickiness in Cotton (pp. 3–19). International Cotton Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• International Textile Manufacturers Federation (ITMF) (2016). Cotton contamination surveys (2005-2016). Wiedingstrasse 9, CH - 8055 Zürich. Web http://www.itmf.org
   Google Scholar
• International Textile Manufacturers Federation (ITMF) (2020). Cotton contamination surveys (2007•2009•2011•2013•2016•2019). Wiedingstrasse 9, CH - 8055 Zürich. Web http://www.itmf.org
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, H., & Gameel, O. L. (1982). Control of cotton stickiness through breeding cultivars resistant to whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gene.) infestation. Improvement of oil seed industrial crops by induced mutations (pp. 181–186). IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, S. (2018). First experience of the automated stickiness testing with Loeofe FIBERMAP/Mesdan CONTEST. 34^th International Cotton Conference, March 21-23, Bremen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Tesema, G. B., & Drieling, A. (2019). Statistical Analysis and Instrumental Characterization of commercial Ethiopian Cotton Varieties. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology Management, 11(1)
   Google Scholar
• Tesema, G. B., & Drieling, A. (2020). Effect of Ginning on Tenacity, Elongation and other Fibre Quality Properties. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 111(3), 326–333. volume
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar