Sorting study on the toxicity screening of a single pollutant towards enterprises based on the USEtox model and textile industry cases

References

• American Chemical Society. (2014). CAS registry. Retrieved from http://www.cas.org/content/chemical-substances
   Google Scholar
• Ayed, L., Ksibi, I., Charef, A., & Mzoughi, R. (2021). Hybrid coagulation-flocculation and anaerobic-aerobic biological treatment for industrial textile wastewater: Pilot case study. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 112(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1731273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørn, A., Diamond, M., Birkved, M., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2014). Chemical footprint method for improved communication of freshwater ecotoxicity impacts in the context of ecological limits. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(22), 13253–13262. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503797d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Zhu, J., Yang, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Assessing environmental impact of textile production with water alkalization footprint. The Science of the Total Environment, 719(11), 137522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137522
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu, J., Li, Y., Xu, P. H., & Wang, L. L. (2019). Environmental Footprint accounting and evaluation of textile and garment products. Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University: Natural Science Edition, 41(06), 707–715. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, M. L., de Wit, C. A., Molander, S., Scheringer, M., Backhaus, T., Lohmann, R., Arvidsson, R., Bergman, Å., Hauschild, M., Holoubek, I., Persson, L., Suzuki, N., Vighi, M., & Zetzsch, C. (2015). Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution. Environment International, 78, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantke, P., Bijste, M., Guignard, C., Hauschild, M., Huijbregts, M., Jolliet, O., Kounina, A., Magaud, V., Margni, M., McKone, T., Posthuma, L., Rosenbaum, R. K., van de Meent, D., & van Zelm, R. (2017). USEtox® 2.0 documentation (version 1). Retrieved from http://usetox.org
   Google Scholar
• Ferng, J. J. (2002). Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecological Economics, 40(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00270-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisco, A., & Daniel, S. (2019). Global chemicals outlook II: From legacies to innovative solutions. United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, L. (2012). Global chemicals outlook: Towards sound management of chemicals. United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, N., Diamond, M. L., Huijbregts, M., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Guinée, J. B., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., & Meent, D. (2011). Implications of considering metal bioavailability in estimates of freshwater ecotoxicity: Examination of two case studies. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(8), 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0317-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. O. D., Garcia-Encina, P. A., & Irusta-Mata, R. (2017). The potential ecotoxicological impact of pharmaceutical and personal care products on humans and freshwater, based on USEtox characterization factors. A Spanish case study of toxicity impact scores. Science of the Total Environment, 609(31), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv2017.07.148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hao, T., Du, P. F., Du, B., & Zeng, S. Y. (2014). A Study on priority Contaminant screening sequencing in coking industry based on USEtox. Environmental Science, 35, 304–312. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.2014.01.044
   Google Scholar
• Hauschild, M. Z., Huijbregts, M., Jolliet, O., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., van de Meent, D., Rosenbaum, R. K., & McKone, T. E. (2008). Building a model based on scientific consensus for life cycle impact assessment of chemicals: The search for harmony and parsimony. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(19), 7032–7037. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703145t
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauschild, M. Z., Jolliet, O., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2011). A bright future for addressing chemical emissions in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(8), 697–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0320-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, K. H., Zhai, Y. P., & Wang, Y. Z. (2018). Textile chemical management is urgent. Textile Science Research, 3, 26–28. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Huijbregts, M., Margni, M., Hauschild, M., Jolliet, O., McKone, T., Rosenbaum, R., Meent, D. V. (2017). USEtox® 2.0 user manual (version 2). Retrieved from http://usetox.org
   Google Scholar
• Indumathy, K., & Kannan, K. P. (2020). Eco-benign fungal colorants: Sources and applications in textiles. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 111(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2019.1634973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPE. (2016). Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs (IPE). Retrieved from http://www.ipe.org.cn
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Q., Li, C., Liu, L., Su, L. H., Shen, Z. M., & Shan, A. D. (2017). Study on pollution Source control based on toxic Footprint. Environment and Sustainable Development, 4, 19–21. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., Posner, S., & Roos, S. (2018). Sustainable chemicals: A model for practical substitution. Detox Fashion, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, H. S., Sheng, C. H., & Zhang, P. F. (2015). A method for the rapid determination of free heavy metal Nickel in textiles. China Fibre Inspection, 18, 86–88. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. P., Li, J., & Cao, Y. R. (2014). Safety limit requirements for chlorophenol in textiles. Dyeing and Finishing Technology, 36, 49–51. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9350.2014.02.015
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Luo, Y., & He, Q. (2020). Chemical footprint of textile and apparel products: An assessment of human and ecological toxicities based on USEtox model. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 111(7), 960–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2019.1710907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. R., Lam, C. W., & Schoenung, J. M. (2010). Quantity-based and toxicity-based evaluation of the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178(1–3), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Mou, J. Y., Luo, Y., & Wang, L. L. (2019). Accounting and Evaluation demonstration of ecological toxic Footprint in textile printing and dyeing industry. Modern Textile Technology, 27(4), 65–70. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19398/j.att.201807036
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Shu, C. (2018). The economic analysis of the wastewater treatment model of printing and dyeing industry. Silk, 652(8), 68–74. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7003.2018.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q. (2013). Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs. World Environment, 6, 93. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Li, Y., Lou, Z. X., & Xie, H. M. (2016). Problems and countermeasures of wastewater treatment in Shaoxing textile printing and dyeing Industry. Silk, 53(8), 45–51. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7003.2016.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). Control quantity or toxicity of textile chemicals? A case study of denim jeans in the warp-dyeing phase. Textile Research Journal, 91(15–16), 1900–1916. ( https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517521993488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environmental Protection of China. (2012). Discharge standard for water pollutants of textile dyeing and finishing industry (GB4287-2012).
   Google Scholar
• Moazzem, S., Daver, F., Crossin, E., & Wang, L. J. (2018). Assessing environmental impact of textile supply chain using life cycle assessment methodology. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 109(12), 1574–1585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2018.1434113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed, V. B. H., Arunprasath, R., & Purusothaman, G. (2020). Biological treatment of azo dyes on effluent by Neurospora sp isolated and adopted from dye contaminated site. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 111(9), 1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2019.1690917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, K. (2011). The chemicals in products project: Case study of the textiles sector. Retrieved March 7, 2020, from https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/chemicals-products-project-case-study-textiles-sector
   Google Scholar
• Nordborg, M., Arvidsson, R., Finnveden, G., Cederberg, C., Sörme, L., Palm, V., Stamyr, K., & Molander, S. (2017). Updated indicators of Swedish national human toxicity and ecotoxicity footprints using USEtox 2.01. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, J. H., Li, Y., & Wang, L. L. (2018). Accounting and evaluation of chemical footprint of denim fabrics. Printing and Dyeing, 44(13), 52–55. (In Chinese). doi:CNKI:SUN:YIRA.0.2018-13-014
   Google Scholar
• Roos, S. (2015). Towards sustainable use of chemicals in the textile industry: How life cycle assessment can contribute. Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, S., Holmquist, H., Jönsson, C., & Arvidsson, R. (2018). USEtox characterisation factors for textile chemicals based on a transparent data source selection strategy. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(4), 890–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1330-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, S., & Peters, G. M. (2015). Three methods for strategic product toxicity assessment—The case of the cotton T-shirt. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(7), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0895-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, S., Posner, S., Jonsson, C., & Peters, G. M. (2015). Is unbleached cotton better than bleached? Exploring the limits of life-cycle assessment in the textile sector. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 33(4), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15576404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, R. K., Bachmann, T. M., Gold, L. S., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Koehler, A., Larsen, H. F., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., McKone, T. E., Payet, J., Schuhmacher, M., van de Meent, D., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2008). USEtox–the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: Recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in Life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13(7), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira, J., Nadal, M., Schuhmacher, M., & Domingo, J. L. (2017). Home textile as a potential pathway for dermal exposure to trace elements: Assessment of health risks. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 108(11), 1966–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.1302635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala, S., & Goralczyk, M. (2013). Chemical footprint: A methodological framework for bridging life cycle assessment and planetary boundaries for chemical pollution. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 9(4), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörme, L., Palm, V., & Finnveden, G. (2016). Using E-PRTR data on point source emissions to air and water—First steps towards a national chemical footprint. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 56, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Edwards, S. J., & Walker, T. R. (2020). A toxicity-based analysis of Canada's National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI): A case study in Nova Scotia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(2), 2238–2247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06933-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Z. J., Li, Y., Xu, P. H., & Wang, L. L. (2019). The textile industry is given priority to control the screening of heavy metal pollutants. China Textile Leader, 904(3), 71–73. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-3025.2019.03.018
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Z. J., Wang, L. L., & Li, Y. (2019). Accounting and evaluation of chemical footprint of textile and garment products. Silk, 56(1), 33–37. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7003.2019.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Z. J., Yang, Y. L., & Wang, L. L. (2020). An improved method for assessing environmental impacts caused by chemical pollutants: A case study in textiles production. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 36(4), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233720919662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wender, B. A., Prado, V., Fantke, P., Ravikumar, D., & Seager, T. P. (2018). Sensitivity-based research prioritization through stochastic characterization modeling. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(2), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1322-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westh, T. R. B., Hauschild, M. Z., Birkved, M. J., Rgensen, M. S. G., Rosenbaum, R. K., & Fantke, P. (2015). The USEtox story: A survey of model developer visions and user requirements. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0829-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO IARC. (1974). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, 4, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0015-6264(81)90404-1
   Google Scholar