Cotton contamination

References

• M.H.J. van der Sluijs, Tex. Asia 38(7) (2007) p.63–66.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs, Australian Cotton Grower. 28(2) (2007) p.48–50.
   Google Scholar
• L. Hunter, Tex Rep. (2) (1989) p.21.
   Google Scholar
• R.N. Narkhedkar and S.S. Lavate, Indian Textile J. 121(9) (2011) p.87–92.
   Google Scholar
• S. Schlichter and P. Loesbrock, Foreign Particles in Cotton – origin of contamination and removal in processing, in Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN., 1997, p.673–678.
   Google Scholar
• P. Haldermann and R. Keller, Pakistan Tex. J. 41(4) (1992) p.33–35.
   Google Scholar
• A. Hamai, The problems in international trade caused by insufficient knowledge about cotton quality, in 62 nd Plenary Session of the ICAC, Gdansk, Poland, 2003, p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• E. Walraf, Rieter Link. 12(30) (2000) p.10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Int. Trade Centre. SITC 263 (2007) p.365.
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Strolz, ITMF cotton contamination survey 2001, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2002, p.41–45.
   Google Scholar
• B. Potter, Farm J. (2015) p.1.
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Garde, P.H. Shah, and D.I. Patel, J. Inst. Eng., India. 77(1) (1996) p.14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Zhou, ITMF Spinners Comm. (2017) p.6.
   Google Scholar
• K. Sharma, Indian Tex. J. 123(11) (2013) p.34–41.
   Google Scholar
• G. Thilagavathi and T. Karthik, Control of wastes in spinning, in Process Control and Yarn Quality in Spinning, Woodhead Publishing India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India, 2013, p. 69–140.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, The sixth international congress, in The International Cotton Federation, Milan, Italy, 1909, p.384.
   Google Scholar
• P. Schoeller and F. Blum, Contamination –the spinners perspective, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2000, p.46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Int. Tex. Manufact. Feder. (2017) p.279.
   Google Scholar
• B.K. Patodia, Contamination – a pain in the neck of spinners, in 62nd Plenary Session of the ICAC, Gdansk, Poland, 2003, p.12.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, ICAC Record. 24(1) (2006) p.9–14.
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Strolz, Asian Text. J. 13(5) (2004) p.29–32.
   Google Scholar
• G. Estur, Quality and marketing of cotton lint in Africa, in Africa Region Working Paper Series No.121, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2008, p.82.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, ICAC/CFC. (2008) p.28.
   Google Scholar
• M.K. Sharma, Contamination, trash and moisture control in ginning & pressing factories, in Cotton India 2014, Nagpur, India, (2014) p.5.
   Google Scholar
• M. Vijayshankar, Extraneous Contamination in raw cotton bales – a nightmare to spinners, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2006, p.61–76.
   Google Scholar
• F.W. Gerber, Melliand Textilber. 67(12) (1986) p.847–849 and E344–E345.
   Google Scholar
• S.D. Kretzschmar and R. Furter, Appl. Rep. SE 620 (2008) p.16.
   Google Scholar
• D. Herber, et al., Physiol. Today. 2(1) (1990) p.4.
   Google Scholar
• M. Knappe, Cotton Grower. (2014) p.1.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Knitt. Int. 121(1436) (2015) p.36–37.
   Google Scholar
• G. Naik and M. Abraham, Centre Pub. Policy. (2009) p.29.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Contamination of cotton, in First Quarterly Report for FY05, State Bank of Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan, 2005, p.101–104.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Tex. Asia. 35(9) (2004) p.79–80.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gaur, Text. Asia. 36(7) (2005) p.78–79.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs, Cotton Catchment Commun. CRC. (2009) p.36.
   Google Scholar
• S.G. Gordon, M.H.J. van der Sluijs, and M.W. Prins, Australian Cotton Coopera. Res. Centre. (2004) p.60.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs and P.D. Johnson, CSIRO. (2011) p.128.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs, V. Shankar, and S.G. Gordon, Australian Cotton Grower. 25(1) (2004) p.46–52.
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Strolz, ITMF cotton contamination survey 1997, in International Cotton Conference. Bremen, Germany, 1998, p.21–25.
   Google Scholar
• M. Pavaskar and R. Pavaskar, Cotton Statis. News. (34) (2016) p.9–10.
   Google Scholar
• E. Van Nimmen and L. van Langenhove, Spinners tools to deal with cotton contamination, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Diego, CA., 1998, p.723–725.
   Google Scholar
• B.J. Hamilton, K.A. Thoney, and W. Oxenham, Indian Tex. J. 122(7) (2012) p.48–56.
   Google Scholar
• G. Blomquist, We can stop contamination - this is how to do it, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LN, 1997, p.688–689.
   Google Scholar
• J.G. Jordan, Lint contamination - a serious threat to U.S. cotton, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2004, p.38–39.
   Google Scholar
• S. Simpson, Contamination: Educating the ginner and grower, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Diego, CA, 1998, p.461–463.
   Google Scholar
• D. Whitelock, et al., What research is happening to help prevent contamination of U.S. cotton?, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dallas, TX, 2017, p.435–440.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs and A. Krajewski, Contamination detection using module hood feeder sensors, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2015, p.990–998.
   Google Scholar
• B. Haney and R. Byler, Plastic impurities found in cotton, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dallas, TX, 2017, p.332–338.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Joint Cotton Indust. Bale Packag. Comm. (2017) p.28.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Minutes of the standing committe, in International Cotton Advisory Committee, Washington, DC, 1988, p.61.
   Google Scholar
• A. Jordan, Joint Cotton Indust. Bale Packag. Comm. (2000) p.2.
   Google Scholar
• M. Gupta and N. Aggarwal, IUP J. Agricult. Econ. 7(1 & 2) (2010), p.7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Nat. Cotton Council Am. (2009) p.8.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs, V. Shankar, and S.G. Gordon, Text. Asia. 35(2) (2004) p.57–59.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ray and B. Chatterjee, J. Tex. Assoc. 72(1) (2001) p.5–8.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs, M. Freijah, and M. Guittet, The removal of plastic wrap during processing, in Australian Cotton Research Conference, Canberra, ACT, 2017, p.S77.
   Google Scholar
• C. Faerber, A. Leder, and G. Engels, A modular solution to combat the foreign matter problem in ginning and spinning, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2010, p.243–252.
   Google Scholar
• M.H.J. van der Sluijs and M. Freijah, A preliminary investigation into the removal of plastic wrap during ginning and textile processing, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LN, 2016, p.885.
   Google Scholar
• C. Faerber, A. Leder, and G. Engels, Melliand Int. 16(3) (2010) p.101–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Schlapfer, Text. Month. (2) (2008) p.26.
   Google Scholar
• H. Spinner, Text. Asia. 35(9) (2004) p.35–38.
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Church, J.A. O'Neill, and A.L. Woodhead, Appl. Spectrosc. 52(8) (1998) p.1039–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Pusch, et al., Melliand English. 89(6) (2008) p.E57–E58.
   Google Scholar
• D. Jia and T. Ding, Opt. Eng. 44(7) (2005) p.6.
   Google Scholar
• M. Santiago Cintron and J. Rodgers, Examination of cotton fibers and common contaminants using an infrared microscope and a focal-plane array detector, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2016, p.323–325.
   Google Scholar
• N.S. Mehta, et al., X-Ray microtomographic image analysis for identification of cotton contaminants, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, Memphis, TN, 2001, p.1303.
   Google Scholar
• D.S. Himmelsbach, J.W. Hellgeth, and McAlister, J. Agric. Food Chem. 54(20) (2006) p.7405–7412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Wulfhorst, J. Bergmann, and I. Hormes, Melliand English. 12 (1989) p.E377–E379.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ding, et al., An automated cotton contamination detection system based on co- occurrence matrix contrast information, in Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, Shangai, China, 2009, p.517–521.
   Google Scholar
• A. Mustafic and C. Li, Text. Res. J. 85(12) (2015) p.1209–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Yu and L. Changying, Identification of cotton foreign matter using line-scan hyperspectral imaging system, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2015, p.803–807.
   Google Scholar
• C. Faerber and A. Leder, New method for the detection and separation of Foreign parts including polypropelene, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2008, p.216–220.
   Google Scholar
• S. Rufo and H. Speich, Rieter Link. 22(56) (2010) p.15.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Melliand Int. 17(1) (2011) p.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon, Nat. Cotton Council Am. (2016) p.3.
   Google Scholar
• A. Basu, Asian Text. J. 13(9) (2003) p.103–106.
   Google Scholar
• S. Rajpal, Cotton Statist. News. 34(22) (2016) p.1–4.
   Google Scholar
• M. Pavaskar and R. Pavaskar, Cotton Statist. News (35) (2016) p.8–10.
   Google Scholar
• T. Nassiou and B. Buchmann, Cotton Int. 3 (2005) p.18.
   Google Scholar
• A. Krajewski and S.G. Gordon, Cotton contamination detection sensors, in Final Report. Cotton Research and Development Corporation, Narrabri, NSW, 2014, p.17.
   Google Scholar
• W. Kiechl, Is there an ideal cleaning point for Textile Contaminants?, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2004, p.143–149.
   Google Scholar
• V. Mudhuri and H.R. Shah, Text. Indust. India. 53(5) (2014) p.15–21.
   Google Scholar
• R. Byler, J.C. Boykin, and R.G. Hardin, Removal of plastic sheet material with normal cotton ginning equipment, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2013, p.676–685.
   Google Scholar
• R.G. Hardin and R. Byler, J. Cotton Sci. 20(4) (2016) p.375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.G. Hardin, R. Byler, and C.D. Delhom, Removal of plastic materials using adjustments and revisions to standard seed cotton cleaning equipment - progress report, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2015, p.973–980.
   Google Scholar
• K. Baker, et al., Detection of plastic and oily contamination in seed cotton at the gin using infra-red, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2015, p.981–989.
   Google Scholar
• P.A. Funk, Detecting plastics in seedcotton, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, Nashville, TN, 2008, p.620–624.
   Google Scholar
• D. Whitelock, et al., Continued work to develop a low-cost sensor to detect plastic contamination in seed cotton at the gin, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, Dallas, TX, 2017, p.389–397.
   Google Scholar
• P.A. Funk, et al., J. Cotton Sci. 12(3) (2008) p.237–245.
   Google Scholar
• M. Vijayshankar, Processing your product – using Australian cotton’, in 13th Australian Cotton Conference, Broadbeach, Queensland, 2006, p.8.
   Google Scholar
• R. Furter, Uster Technol. AG. (Application Report SE594) (2006) p.32.
   Google Scholar
• S. Balamurugan, Asian Text. J. 13 (2003) p.69.
   Google Scholar
• C. Faerber and A. Leder, Progress in detecting and removing cotton contaminants in spinning, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2016, p.57.
   Google Scholar
• W. Oxenham, ATI 29(4) (2000) p.59–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon, Text. Magazine. 57(11) (2016) p.2.
   Google Scholar
• L. van Langenhove and P. Kiekens, Contamination of cotton fibres: how to solve the problem, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2000, p.56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Schlafhorst Zinser Exp. (2) (2017) p.18–19.
   Google Scholar
• K.L. Fabian, Schlafhorst Document. (18) (1986) p.10.
   Google Scholar
• F.H. Frey, Melliand Int. 1 (1995) p.16–18.
   Google Scholar
• E.F. Hequet and N. Abidi, Sticky Cotton – Measurements and Fiber Processing. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, TX, 2006, p.175.
   Google Scholar
• E.F. Hequet, T.J. Henneberry, and R.L. Nicols, USDA ARS Tech. Bull. 2007 (1915) p.219.
   Google Scholar
• J.-P. Gourlot, 2012 updated bibliography on stickiness causes, measurements and consequences, in ICCTM-ITMF, Bremen, Germany, 2012, p.13.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Proceedings of the ICCTM Meeting, Bremen, Germany, March 20, 2012, p.12.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Proceedings of the ICCTM Meeting, Bremen, Germany, March 18, 2014, p.12.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Proceedings of the ICCTM Meeting, Bremen, Germany, March 15, 2016, p.12.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Bremen Aachen Survey on Cotton Quality, Bremen, Germany, 2017, p.6.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Improvement of the marketability of cotton produced in zones affected by stickiness, in Technical Paper No. 17, J.-P. Gourlot and R. Frydrych, eds., Common Fund for Commodities, Amsterdam, NL, 2001, p.87.
   Google Scholar
• P.C. Ellsworth, et al., Sticky cotton sources & solutions. The University of Arizona, Cooperative Extension, IPM Series. 13(AZ1156-12) (1999) p.4.
   Google Scholar
• M.I. Afzal, Cotton stickiness – a marketing and processing problem, in Improvement of the Marketability of Cotton Produced in Zones affected by Stickiness, J.-P. Gourlot and R. Frydrych, eds., Lille, France, 2001, p.105–111.
   Google Scholar
• D.E. Brushwood and H.H. Perkins, Cotton stickiness potential as determined by minicard, thermodetector and chemical methods, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, 1993, p.1132–1135.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Honeydew, in International Committee on Cotton Testing Methods, Bremem, Germany, 1988, p.12–18.
   Google Scholar
• D. Messa and S. Meier, Comprehensive cotton testing to obtain the full fiber profile relevant for the preparation process and the yarn quality, in International Cotton Conference, Bremen, Germany, 2016, p.7.
   Google Scholar
• R. Chaudhry, Harvesting and ginning in the world, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, 1997, p.1617–1619.
   Google Scholar
• G. Estur and N. Gergely, The economics of roller ginning technology and implications for African cotton sectors, in African Region Working Paper Series, Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010, p.75.
   Google Scholar
• M.K. Sharma, Cotton ginning technologies - selection criteria for optimum results, in The First International Conference on Science, Industry and Trade of Cotton, Gorgan, Iran, 2012, p.7.
   Google Scholar
• R.D. Rutherford, New developments in cotton ginning from Lummus, in 67 th Plenary Meeting of the ICAC, Bukina Faso, 2008, p.8.
   Google Scholar
• K.D. Baker and A.C. Griffin, Modern ginning systems, Am. Soc. Agron. 24 (1984) p.432–435.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Cotton production practices, in Report prepared by the Secretariat for the 70th Plenary Meeting, ICAC, Editor. Washington, DC, 2011, p.164.
   Google Scholar
• G.A. Carlson and A. Mohamed, Crop Prot. 5(5) (1986) p.348–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.F. Hequet and N. Abidi, J. Cotton Sci. 6(1) (2002) p.77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Plains Cotton Growers Incorp. (1999) p.3.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Managing Silverleaf Whitefly in Australian Cotton, Cotton Info, Editor, Narrabri, NSW, 2016, p.13.
   Google Scholar
• W.S. Smith and N.L. Pearson, Fragments from the Chalazal End of the Cotton Seed  – Their Formation and Factors Affecting Extent of Presence in Ginned Lint, USDA, Washington, DC, 1939, p.35.
   Google Scholar
• J.P. Evenson, Empire Cotton Growing Rev. 32 (1955) p.157–167.
   Google Scholar
• G.J. Mangialardi and W.F. Lalor, Am. Soc. Agricult. Eng. 33(6) (1990) p.1748–1758.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Saranga, et al., Crop Sci. 37 (1997) p.1577–1581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.S. Anthony, et al., Text. Res. J. 58(2) (1988) p.111–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.J. Mangialardi, Text. Res. J. 62(6) (1992) p.335–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Bolek, M. Oglakci, and K. Ozdin, Field Crops Res. 101 (2007) p.155–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Evenson, Seed Coat Neps of Chalazal Origin in Cotton, CSIRO Division of Land Research, Canberra, 1967, p.7.
   Google Scholar
• N.L. Pearson, Agricult. Res. 58(11) (1939) p.865–873.
   Google Scholar
• N.L. Pearson, Seedcoat Fragments in Cotton: An Element of Yarn Quality, in Technical Bulletin 1116, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 1955, p.17.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Boykin, Origin of seed coat fragments in ginned lint, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LN, 2005, p.745–755.
   Google Scholar
• J.-P. Gourlot, et al., Seed coat fragment counting and sizing in card web, in Beltwide Cotton Conference. San Antonio, TX, 1995, p.1245–1249.
   Google Scholar
• W.J. Naarding, Raw cotton related problems: Neps, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 1986, p.429–430.
   Google Scholar
• F. Summers, J. Text. Inst. Trans. 16(11) (1925) p.T323–T330.
   Google Scholar
• J.D. Bargeron and T.H. Garner, The role of seed-coat and mote-fragment neps in yarn and fabric imperfections: A survey, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, 1988, p.586–591.
   Google Scholar
• S.T. Rayburn, Cotton seedcoat fragment research, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, 1985, p.362.
   Google Scholar
• H.H. Perkins, Text. Res. J. 41(7) (1971) p.559–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon, Text. Topics. 21(9-12) (1993) p.1–4.
   Google Scholar
• E.F. Hequet and R. Frydrych, Some recent developments in stickiness, in International Cotton Conference. 1992: Bremen, Germany. p. 225–239.
   Google Scholar
• C.V. Feaster, Dealing with spindle twist, seedcoat fragments, motes, poor preparation, neps, and short fiber in pima cotton, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 1990, p.540–541.
   Google Scholar
• E.F. Hequet, M. Krifa, and J.-P. Gourlot, Trashcam: A new instrument for cotton breeders, in Textile Topics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 1999, p.2–8.
   Google Scholar
• M. Krifa, J.-P. Gourlot, and J.-Y. Dréan, Text. Res. J. 71(11) (2001) p.981–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Bargeron and T.H. Garner, Measurement of cottonseed fragmentation contamination, in Belwide Cotton Conference, Nashville, TN, 1989, p.630–634.
   Google Scholar
• G.J. Mangialardi, J.M. Halloin, and J.J. Herbert, Cottonseed characteristics associated with neps and seed-coat fragments, in The American Society of Agricultural Engineers - International Winter Meeting, Chicago, IL, 1990, p.20.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Boykin, Relationship of seed properties to seed coat fragments for Mid-South cotton varieties, in American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Meeting Presentation, Reno, NV, 2009, p.24.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Boykin, Relationship of seed properties to seed coat fragments for cotton cultivars grown in the Mid-South. Am. Soc. Agricult. Biol. Eng. 53(3) (2010) p.691–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Boykin, Genetic traits associated with seed coat fragments, motes and neps, in Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2006, p.436–447.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, Cotton classification – understanding the data, in USDA AMS Cotton Program, Memphis, TN, 2005, p.14.
   Google Scholar
• S.D. Kretzschmar and R. Furter, A new single fiber testing system for the process control in spinning mills, in Application Report, Uster Technologies, 2008, p.24.
   Google Scholar