Assessment of Complex Cognition: Commentary on the Design and Validation of Assessments

References

• AERA, APA, NCME. (2014). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E. (2010). Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning: A preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 8, 70–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E., & Gitomer, D. H. (2009). Transforming K–12 assessment: Integrating accountability testing, formative assessment, and professional support. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 43–61). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive and affective domains (1st ed.). New York, NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R. (2012). Adolescent literacy: Learning and understanding content. Future of Children, 22, 89–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., & Snow, C. (in press). Adolescent literacy: Development and instruction. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 121–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, S. F., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2006). A validity framework for evaluating the technical quality of alternate assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25, 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. D. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25, 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., & Riconscente, M. M. (2006). Evidence-centered assessment design: Layers, concepts, and terminology. In S. Downing & T. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 61–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2003). Assessment in support of learning and instruction: Bridging the gap between large-scale and classroom assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30, 86–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002). On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 369–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., & Murphy, L. (2012). Reading for understanding: How reading apprenticeship improves disciplinary learning in secondary and college classrooms, 2nd Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Focus article. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14, 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (1994). The Complete Stories. London: The Women's Press. (p. 107).
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2004a). Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2004b). A perspective on current trends in assessment and accountability: Degrees of coherence. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. 103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 272–283). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 46, 716–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2014). Considerations for measuring learning progressions where the target learning is represented as a cycle. Pensamiento Educativo. Revista De Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 51, 156–174.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (2013). A strategy for assessment of competencies in higher education: The BEAR assessment system. In S. Blomeke, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, C. Kuhn, & J. Fege (Eds.), Modeling and measuring competencies in higher education: Tasks and challenges (pp. 61–80). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 181–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar