The Place of CLIL in (Bilingual) Education

References

• Alexander, B. (2008). Web 2.0 and emergent multiliteracies. Theory into Practice, 47, 150–160. doi:10.1080/00405840801992371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsamo, A. (2010). “Working the Paradigm Shift”, Chapter 19. In D. Araya. & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Education in the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation (pp. 423–427). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why … and why not. System, 41, 587–597. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, H. (2005). Reconsidering the nexus of content and language: A mandate of the NCLB legislation. Modern Language Journal, 89, 277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B., & Snow, C. E. (Eds.). (1990). English plus: Issues in bilingual education. The annals of the American academy of political and social science (pp. 508). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2013). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35, 243–262. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 543–562. doi:10.2167/beb459.0
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL – Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Meyer, O., Halbach, A., & Schuck, K. (2017). Knowledge ecology for conceptual growth: Teachers as active agents in developing a PluriLiteracies approach to Teaching for Learning (PTL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualizing. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–38. doi:10.1515/eujal-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., LLinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). You can stand under my umbrella: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Gensee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35, 213–218. doi:10.1093/applin/amu010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union High-Level Group of Experts on Literacy. (2012). Final Report. European Commission. 1–104. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/school/doc/literacy-report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century. A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, O., Bartlett, L., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2007). From biliteracy to pluriliteracies. In P. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics, Vol. 5: Multilingualism (pp. 207–228). Berlin, DE: Mouton-de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2008). Chapter 8, Discourses and literacies and Chapter 9, Language, individuals and discourses in Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (3rd ed., pp. 150–222). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert, K. (2013). Finding wisdom in practice: The genesis of the salty chip, a Canadian multiliteracies collaborative. Language and Literature, 15, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger, N. H. (2002). Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An Ecological Approach. Language Policy, 1, 27–51. doi:10.1023/A:1014548611951
   Google Scholar
• Huettner, J., & Smit, U. (2014). CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning). International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 146–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64, 367–375. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of languages in CLIL. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (2014). Using form-focused tasks to integrate language across the immersion curriculum. System, 54, 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O., Imhof, M., Coyle, D., & Banerjee, M. (2018). Positive learning and pluriliteracies: Growth in higher education and implications for course design, assessment and research. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia., G. Wittum., & A. Dengel (Eds.), Positive learning in the age of information. A blessing or a curse? (pp. 235–266). Wiesbaden, DE: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mühlhäusler, P. (2000). Language planning and language ecology. Issues in Language Planning, 1), 306–367. doi:10.1080/14664200008668011
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U. (2016). Conceptualizing Integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Polias, J. (2016). Apprenticing students into science: Doing, talking, writing and drawing scientifically. Melbourne, AU: Lexis Education.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government, Department of Education and Arts. ( n d). Literacy – The key to learning. http://education.qld.gov.au/publication/production/reports/pdfs/literacy-framework-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sadovnik, A. R. (2001). Basil Bernstein (1924-2000) Prospects: The quarterly review of comparative education, vol. XXXI, no. 4 (pp. 687–703). Paris, FR: UNESCO, International Bureau of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling. A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40–59. doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L. (2010). Telling ELT Tales out of School. The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2–6. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies., 30, 1024–1054. doi:10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, H. J. (2008). Constructing tasks for content and language integrated learning and assessment. In O. Eckerth & S. Siekmann (Eds.), Task-based language learning and teaching – Theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 227–290). Frankfurt, DE: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Zwiers, J. (2007). Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 93–116. doi:10.1111/ijal.2007.17.issue-1
   Google Scholar