Educators’ perspectives on supporting student agency

References

• Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahou, L. (2012). Cultivating student agency and teachers as learners in one lebanese school. Educational Action Research, 20, 233–250. doi:10.1080/09650792.2012.676288
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice [Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique]. Transl. by Richard Nice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Thomas, E. (2017). Uncovering ‘unwelcome truths’ through student voice: Teacher inquiry into agency and student assessment literacy. Teaching Education, 28, 162–177. doi:10.1080/10476210.2016.1229291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Stern, R. (2015). The role of inquiry in teacher leadership. In N. Bond Ed., The power of teacher leaders: Their roles, influence, and impact (pp. 196–209). New York, NY: Routledge. Cook-Sather (this issue).
   Google Scholar
• Deed, C., Cox, P., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., Keeffe, M., … Waldrip, B. (2014). Personalised learning in the open classroom: The mutuality of teacher and student agency. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9, 66–75. doi:10.1080/18334105.2014.11082020
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2007). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?: A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, C. D. (2008). Examining curricular coherence in an exemplary elementary school program. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 71–84. doi:10.1080/02701367.2008.10599462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. (2007). “And that’s just how it starts”: Teaching mathematics and developing student agency. Teachers College Record, 109, 420–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L., & Serriere, S. C. (2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: Examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 743–774. doi:10.3102/0002831212443079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Maulucci, M. S., Brotman, J. S., & Fain, S. S. (2015). Fostering structurally transformative teacher agency through science professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 545–559. doi:10.1002/tea.v52.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2017). Rethinking learner and teacher roles: Incorporating student voice and agency into teaching practice. Journal of Initial Teacher Inquiry, 3, 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, 10, 5–17. doi:10.1177/1365480207073702
   Google Scholar
• Ryerson, R. (2017). Creating possibilities: Studying the student experience. Educational Research, 59, 297–315. doi:10.1080/00131881.2017.1343091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruce, R., & Bol, L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 245–277. doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9124-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadich, B., Deed, C., Campbell, C., & Prain, V. (2007). Student engagement in the middle years: A year 8 case study. Issues in Educational Research, 17, 256–271.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2010). Transforming science learning and student participation in sixth grade science: A case study of a low-income, urban, racial minority classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43, 38–55. doi:10.1080/10665680903472367
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2017). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• van Haren, R. (2010). Engaging learner diversity through learning by design. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7, 258–271. doi:10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.258
   Google Scholar
• Varelas, M., Tucker-Raymond, E., & Richards, K. (2015). A structure-agency perspective on young children’s engagement in school science: Carlos’s performance and narrative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 516–529. doi:10.1002/tea.v52.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Duyke, K., & Matusov, E. (2016). Flowery math: A case for heterodiscoursia in mathematics problems solving in recognition of students’ authorial agency. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11, 1–21. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2015.1090904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, T. (2014). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, T., & Compton, R. A. (2012). Creating innovators: The making of young people who will change the world. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar