The vertical and the longitudinal dynamic responses of the vehicle–track system to squat-type short wavelength irregularity

REFERENCES

• Li Z, Zhao X, Esveld C, Dollevoet R, Molodova M. An investigation into the causes of squats: Correlation analysis and numerical modeling. Wear. 2008;265:1349–1355.
   Google Scholar
• Chaar N, Berg M. Simulation of vehicle–track interaction with flexible wheelsets, moving track models and field tests. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2006;44:921–931. doi: 10.1080/00423110600907667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassie SL, Gregory RW, Harrison D, Johnson KL. The dynamic response of railway track to high frequency vertical excitation. J Mech Eng Sci. 1982;24:77–90. doi: 10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1982_024_016_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Dollevoet R, Molodova M, Zhao X. Squat growth – some observations and the validation of numerical predictions. Wear. 2011;271:148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z. A guideline to best practice of squat treatment, UIC (International Union of Railways) report; 2011 Oct.
   Google Scholar
• Smulders J. Management and research tackle rolling contact fatigue. Railway Gaz Int. 2003 Jun;159:439–442.
   Google Scholar
• Grassie SL. Squats and squat-type defects in rails: the understanding to date. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2012;226:235–242. doi: 10.1177/0954409711422189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal S, Valente C, Daniel W, Farjoo M. Metallurgical and physical understanding of rail squat initiation and propagation. Wear. 2012;284–285:30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins H, Stephenson J, Clayton G, Morland G, lyon D. The effect of track and vehicle parameters on wheel/rail vertical dynamic forces. Railway Eng J. 1974 Jan;3:2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Knothe KL, Grassie SL. Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1993;22:209–262.
   Google Scholar
• Grassie SL. Models of railway track and vehicle–track interaction at high frequencies: results of benchmark test. Vehicle Syst Dyn Suppl. 1996;25:243–262.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson C, Dahlberg T. Wheel/rail impacts at railway turnout crossing. J Rail Rapid Transit. 1998;212: 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Wu TX, Thompson DJ. The effects of track non-linearity on wheel/rail impact. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2004;218: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen MJMM. Modeling of wheels and rail discontinuities in dynamic wheel–rail contact analysis. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2006;44:763–787. doi: 10.1080/00423110600648535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MXD, Berggren EG, Berg M. Assessment of vertical track geometry quality based on simulations of dynamic track–vehicle interaction. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2009;223:131–139. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie G, Iwnicki SD. Simulation of wear on a rough rail using a time-domain wheel–track interaction model. Wear. 2008;265:1572–1583. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripke B, Knothe K. Simulation of high frequency vehicle–track interactions. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1995;24: 72–85. doi: 10.1080/00423119508969616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempelmann K, Knothe KL. An extended linear model for prediction of short pitch corrugation. Wear. 1996;191:161–169. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)06747-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knothe K, Groß-Thebing A. Short wavelength rail corrugation and non-steady-state contact mechanics. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2008;46:49–66. doi: 10.1080/00423110701590180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong J, Murray M, Steffes D. Examination of railway track dynamic models capabilities against measured field data. Proceedings of International Heavy Haul Conference; 2007 Jun 11–13; Kiruna. p. 257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Groß-Thebing A, Knothe K, Hempelmann K. Wheel–rail contact mechanics for short wavelengths rail irregularities. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1992;20:210–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kalker JJ. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gross-Thebing A. Frequency-dependent creep coefficients for three-dimensional rolling contact problem. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1989;18:359–374. doi: 10.1080/00423118908968927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshari A, Shabana AA. Directions of the tangential creep forces in railroad vehicle dynamics. J Comput Nonlin Dyn. 2010;5: 021006-1–021006-10. doi: 10.1115/1.4000796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollevoet R, Li Z, Arias-Cuevas O. A method for the prediction of head checking initiation location and orientation under operational loading conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2010;224:369–374. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S, Bezin Y, Xie G, Kassa E. Advances in vehicle–track interaction tools. Railway Gazette Int. 2009 Sep;165:47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Baeza L, Fayos J, Roda A, Insa R. High frequency railway vehicle–track dynamics through flexible rotating wheelsets. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2008;46:647–662. doi: 10.1080/00423110701656148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen Z, Jin X, Zhang W. Contact-impact stress analysis of rail joint region using the dynamic finite element method. Wear. 2005;258:1301–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang T, Dhanasekar M. Dynamic finite element analysis of the wheel–rail interaction adjacent to the insulated joints. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems (CM2006); 2006 Sep 24–26; Brisbane, Australia. p. 509–516.
   Google Scholar
• Pletz M, Daves W, Fischer FD, Ossberger H. A dynamic wheel set-crossing model regarding impact, sliding and deformation. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems (CM2009); 2009 Sep 15–18; Florence, Italy. p. 801–808.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhao X, Dollevoet R, Molodova M. Differential wear and plastic deformation as causes of squat at track local stiffness change combined with other track short defects. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2008;46(Suppl):237–246. doi: 10.1080/00423110801935855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KL. Contact mechanics. London: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Remington PJ. Wheel/rail noise – Part IV: rolling noise. J Sound Vib. 1976;46:419–436. doi: 10.1016/0022-460X(76)90864-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson DJ. The influence of the contact zone on the excitation of wheel/rail noise. J Sound Vib. 2003;267:523–535. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00712-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molodova M, Li Z, Dollevoet R. Axle box acceleration: measurement and simulation for detection of short track defects. Wear. 2011;271:349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Li Z. The solution of frictional wheel–rail rolling contact with a 3D transient finite element model: validation and error analysis. Wear. 2011;271:444–452. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhao X, Dollevoet R. The determination of a critical size for rail top surface defects to grow into squats. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems (CM2009); 2009 Sep 15–18; Florence, Italy. p. 379–388.
   Google Scholar
• Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. On the partial differential equations of mathematical physics. Math Ann. 1928;100:32–74. doi: 10.1007/BF01448839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson DJ, Hallquist JO. A single surface contact algorithm for the post-buckling analysis of shell structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1990;78:141–163. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(90)90098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton P, Allery MBP. Metallurgical aspects of surface damage problems in rails. Can Metall Q. 1982;21:31–46. doi: 10.1179/000844382795243803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar