Investigation of the impact of locomotive creep control on wear under changing contact conditions

References

• Bakhvalov Y, Kolpahchyan P. Mathematical modelling of electromechanical processes in electric locomotive. Paper presented at: the 16th IMACS World Congress; 2000; August 21–25; Lausanne (Switzerland).
   Google Scholar
• Senini S, Flinders F, Oghanna W. Dynamic simulation of wheel–rail interaction for locomotive traction studies. Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference; 1993; April 6–8; Pittsburgh, PA. p. 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Park D, Kim M, Lee J, Kim Y. Hybrid re-adhesion control method for traction system of high-speed railway. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS 2001), vol. 2; 2001; August 18–20; Shenyang, China. p. 739–742.
   Google Scholar
• Ohishi K, Nakano K, Miyashita I, Yasukawa S. Anti-slip control of electric motor coach based on disturbance observer. The Fifth International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC '98); 1998; June 29–July 1, Coimbra. p. 580–585.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuoka I, Henmi T. Improvement of re-adhesion for commuter trains with vector control traction inverter. Proceedings of the Power Conversion Conference, vol. 1; 1997; August 6; Nagaoka. p. 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Simson S, Cole C, Persson I. Co-simulation of a mechatronic system using Gensys and Simulink. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50:495–507. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2011.598940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Lee K, Yoo H. Control system for maximum use of adhesive forces of a railway vehicle in a tractive mode. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2008;22:709–720. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Cole C, Sun YQ. Adhesion estimation and its implementation for traction control of locomotives. Int J Rail Transp. 2014;2:187–204. doi: 10.1080/23248378.2014.924842
   Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Zhang H. The dynamic study of locomotives under saturated adhesion. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49:1321–1338. doi: 10.1080/00423111003668195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei TX, Yu JH, Wilson DA. A mechatronic approach for effective wheel slip control in railway traction. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2009;223:295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Liang B. Re-adhesion control for a railway single wheelset test rig based on the behaviour of the traction motor. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51:1173–1185. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.788194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jendel T. Prediction of wheel profile wear—comparisons with field measurements. Wear. 2002;253:89–99. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00087-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce TG, Sherratt ND. Prediction of wheel profile wear. Wear. 1991;144:343–351. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90025-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Olofsson U. Mapping rail wear regimes and transitions. Wear. 2004;257:721–729. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Bruni S. A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear. 2006;261:1253–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law EH, Cooperrider NK. A survey of railway vehicle dynamics research. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 1974;96:132–146. doi: 10.1115/1.3426785
   Google Scholar
• Guclu R, Metin M. Fuzzy logic control of vibrations of a light rail transport vehicle in use in Istanbul traffic. J Vib Control. 2009;15:1423–1440. doi: 10.1177/1077546309102664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garivaltis DS, Garg VK, D'SOUZA AF. Dynamic response of a six-axle locomotive to random track inputs. Veh Syst Dyn. 1980;9:117–147. doi: 10.1080/00423118008968620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach O. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit. Wear. 2005;258:992–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Polach O, Cole C. Creep force modelling for rail traction vehicles based on the Fastsim algorithm. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51:1765–1783. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.826370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardema MD. Newton–Euler dynamics. New York: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Guy IJ. An analysis of the interaction between the front and rear axles of a four-wheel-drive tractor, and its contribution to power delivery efficiency. Newport: Harper Adams University College; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pegasem. Pegasem GSS series ground speed sensors [Online]. Available from: http://www.pegasem.com/english/datasheets_uk/gss_uk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Abood K, Khan R. Hunting phenomenon study of railway conventional truck on tangent tracks due to change in rail wheel geometry. J Eng Sci Technol. 2011;6:146–160.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson KL. Contact mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Rail Track Materials Catalogue A5. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/doc/92072909/Rail-Track-Material-Catalogue-A5#download
   Google Scholar
• Kalker J. On the rolling contact of two elastic bodies in the presence of dry friction [Ph.D. doctoral thesis], Delft; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Marino R, Tomei P, Verrelli CM. Induction motor control design. London: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar