Performance evaluation and parameter sensitivity of energy-harvesting shock absorbers on different vehicles

References

• Efatpenah K, Beno JH, Nichols SP. Energy requirements of a passive and an electromechanical active suspension system. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2000;34(6):437–458. doi: 10.1076/vesd.34.6.437.2050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo L, Zhang PS. Energy harvesting, ride comfort, and road handling of regenerative vehicle suspensions. J Vib Acoust. 2013;135(1):1–8. doi: 10.1115/1.4007562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks JW. Solid-state energy conversion overview; 2011, June. Available from: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/03/f12/ace00e_fairbanks_2010_o.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karnopp D. Permanent magnet linear motors used as variable mechanical dampers for vehicle suspensions. Veh Syst Dyn. 1989;18(4):187–200. doi: 10.1080/00423118908968918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor M, Redfield R. The variable linear transmission for regenerative damping in vehicle suspension control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1993;22(1):1–20. doi: 10.1080/00423119308969018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda Y, Shiiba T. A new hybrid suspension system with active control and energy regeneration. Veh Syst Dyn. 1996;25(Suppl.1):641–654. doi: 10.1080/00423119608969226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu F, Gu Y, Zheng X. Isolation and energy-regenerative performance experimental verification of automotive electrical suspension. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 2008;42(6):874–887.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy IL, Scruggs JT, Behrens S, Gavin HP. Design and experimental characterization of an electromagnetic transducer for large-scale vibratory energy harvesting applications. J Intell Mat Syst Struct. 2011;22(17):2009–2024. doi: 10.1177/1045389X11421824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zuo L, Luhrs G, Lin L, Qin YX. Electromagnetic energy-harvesting shock absorbers: design, modeling, and road tests. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2013;62(3):1065–1074. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2012.2229308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Z, Guo X, Xu L, Zhang H. Experimental study of damping and energy regeneration characteristics of a hydraulic electromagnetic shock absorber. Adv Mech Eng. 2013;5:943528. doi: 10.1155/2013/943528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberg J, Anderson Z, Tucker C, Schneider J. Recovering energy from shock absorber motion on heavy duty commercial vehicles. SAE World Congress & Exhibition; 2012; doi:10.4271/2012-01-0814.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Jendrzejczyk J, Mulcahy T, Hull J. Design of electromagnetic shock absorbers. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2006;3(3):285–291. doi: 10.1007/s10999-007-9031-5
   Google Scholar
• Nakano K. Combined type self-powered active vibration control of truck cabins. Veh Syst Dyn. 2004;41(6):449–473. doi: 10.1080/00423110512331383858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singal K, Rajamani R. Zero-energy active suspension system for automobiles with adaptive sky-hook damping. J Vib Acoust. 2013;135(1):011011. doi: 10.1115/1.4007020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires L, Smith M, Houghton N, McMahon R. Design trade-offs for energy regeneration and control in vehicle suspensions. Int J Control. 2013;86(11):2022–2034. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2013.830197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zuo L, Kuang J, Luhrs G. Energy-harvesting shock absorber with a mechanical motion rectifier. Smart Mater Struct. 2013;22(2):1–10. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang QN, Liu SS, Wang W-H, Wei H. Structure design and parameter matching of ball-screw regenerative damper. J Jilin Univ(Eng Technol Ed). 2012;42(5):1100–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Zuo L. Equivalent circuit modeling of vehicle dynamics with regenerative shock absorbers. ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences; 2013; Portland, Oregon, USA, p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MC. Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. IEEE Trans Automat Control. 2002;47(10):1648–1662. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2002.803532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MC, Wang FC. Performance benefits in passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters. Veh Syst Dyn. 2004;42(4):235–257. doi: 10.1080/00423110412331289871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chen MZ, Shu Z. Passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters with multiple performance requirements. J Sound Vib. 2014;333(8):2212–2225. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FC, Su WJ. Impact of inerter nonlinearities on vehicle suspension control. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(7):575–595. doi: 10.1080/00423110701519031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X-J, Ahmadian M, Guo K-H. On the benefits of semi-active suspensions with inerters. Shock Vib. 2012;19(3):257–272. doi: 10.1155/2012/640275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 8608: 1995. Mechanical vibration – road surface profiles – reporting of measured data.
   Google Scholar
• Scheibe F, Smith MC. Analytical solutions for optimal ride comfort and tyre grip for passive vehicle suspensions. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009;47(10):1229–1252. doi: 10.1080/00423110802588323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostinacchio M, Ciampa D, Olita S. The vibrations induced by surface irregularities in road pavements–a Matlab® approach. Eur Transp Res Rev. 2014;6(3):267–275. doi: 10.1007/s12544-013-0127-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole D, Cebon D. Truck suspension design to minimize road damage. Proc Instit Mech Eng D – J Aer. 1996;210(2):95–107. doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1996_210_251_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Deng X. Predicting vertical dynamic loads caused by vehicle-pavement interaction. J Transp Eng. 1998;124(5):470–478. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:5(470)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie T, Karamihas S. Simplified models for truck dynamic response to road inputs. Int J Heavy Veh Syst. 2000;7(1):52–63. doi: 10.1504/IJHVS.2000.004450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leming SK, Stalford HL. Bridge weigh-in-motion system development using superposition of dynamic truck/static bridge interaction. Proceedings of the American Control Conference; 2003; Denver, CO, p. 815–820.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Popov A, Cole D. Influence of soil deformation on off-road heavy vehicle suspension vibration. J Terramechanics. 2004;41(1):41–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jterra.2004.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Cai X, Yang J. Genetic algorithm-based optimum vehicle suspension design using minimum dynamic pavement load as a design criterion. J Sound Vib. 2007;301(1–2):18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.08.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belay A, OBrien E, Kroese D. Truck fleet model for design and assessment of flexible pavements. J Sound Vib. 2008;311(3–5):1161–1174. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropáč O, Múčka P. Effects of longitudinal road waviness on vehicle vibration response. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009;47(2):135–53. doi: 10.1080/00423110701867299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besinger F, Cebon D, Cole D. Damper models for heavy vehicle ride dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 1995;24(1):35–64. doi: 10.1080/00423119508969081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekulić D, Dedović V. The effect of stiffness and damping of the suspension system elements on the optimisation of the vibrational behaviour of a bus. Int J Traffic Transp Eng. 2011;1(4):231–244.
   Google Scholar
• Türkay S, Akçay H. A study of random vibration characteristics of the quarter-car model. J Sound Vib. 2005;282(1–2):111–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.02.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madavan NK. Multiobjective optimization using a Pareto differential evolution approach. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation; 2002; Moffett Field, CA, p. 1145–1150.
   Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Dong M, Langari R, Gu L, Guan J. Adaptive hybrid control of vehicle semiactive suspension based on road profile estimation. Shock Vib. 2015;2015(2015):1–13. doi: 10.1155/2015/636739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Dong M, Zhao F, Langari R, Gu L. Road profile classification for vehicle semi-active suspension system based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. IEEE 54th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC); 2015; Osaka, Japan, p. 1533–1538.
   Google Scholar