Railway vehicle performance optimisation using virtual homologation

References

• Bezin Y, Funfschilling C, Kraft S, Mazzola L. Virtual testing environment tools for railway vehicle certification. Proc IMechE Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2015;229:755–769. doi: 10.1177/0954409715587596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach O, Böttcher A, Vannucci D, et al. Validation of simulation models in the context of railway vehicle acceptance. Proc IMechE Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2014;229:729–754. doi: 10.1177/0954409714554275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funfschilling C, Perrin G, Sebes M, Bezin Y, Mazzola L, Nguyen-Tajan M-L. Probabilistic simulation for the certification of railway vehicles. Proc IMechE Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2015;229:770–781. doi: 10.1177/0954409715589395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson N, Fries R, Witte M, et al. Assessment of safety against derailment using simulation and vehicle acceptance tests: a worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2011;49:1113–1157. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2011.586706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UIC 518. Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour – Safety – Track fatigue – Running behaviour; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• EN 14363. Railway applications – testing for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles – testing of running behaviour and stationary tests. Brussels: CENELEC European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Polach O, Evans J. Simulations of running dynamics for vehicle acceptance: application and validation. Int J Railway Technol. 2013;2:59–84. doi:doi:10.4203/ijrt.2.4.4.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson L-O, Nilstam N, Persson I. Using simulations for approval of railway vehicles: a comparison between measured and simulated track forces. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2008;46:869–881. doi: 10.1080/00423110802037123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves JC, Ambrósio JC. Road vehicle modeling requirements for optimization of ride and handling. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2005;13:3–23. doi: 10.1007/s11044-005-2528-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves J, Ambrósio J. Optimization of vehicle suspension systems for improved comfort of road vehicles using flexible multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dynam. 2003;34:113–131. doi: 10.1023/B:NODY.0000014555.46533.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradi R, Melzi S, Ripamonti F, Romani M. Estimation of the comfort indexes of a rail vehicle at design stage. ASME 8th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis; 2006, p. 909–915.
   Google Scholar
• Gong D, Zhou J-S, Sun W-J. On the resonant vibration of a flexible railway car body and its suppression with a dynamic vibration absorber. J Vib Control. 2012. doi:10.1177/1077546312437435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Casas J, Mazzola L, Baeza L, Bruni S. Numerical estimation of stresses in railway axles using a train–track interaction model. Int J Fatigue. 2013;47:18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Vinolas J, Berg M, Polach O, Stichel S. Modelling of suspension components in a rail vehicle dynamics context. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2011;49:1021–1072. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2011.586430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickhoff BM, Evans JR, Minnis AJ. A review of modelling methods for railway vehicle suspension components. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1995;24:469–496. doi: 10.1080/00423119508969105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfi S, Bruni S, Mazzola L. Impact of suspension component modelling on the accuracy of rail vehicle dynamics simulation. Procedings of the 11th Mini conference on Vehicle System Dynamics, Identification and Anomalies, Budapest, Hungary; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nikravesh PE. Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J, Lankarani H, Koshy C. Lubricated revolute joints in rigid multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 2009;56:277–295. doi: 10.1007/s11071-008-9399-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Verissimo P. Improved bushing models for general multibody systems and vehicle dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2009;22:341–365. doi: 10.1007/s11044-009-9161-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo J, Ambrósio J. An alternative method to include track irregularities in railway vehicle dynamic analyses. Nonlinear Dyn. 2012;68:161–176. doi: 10.1007/s11071-011-0212-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski J, Chollet H. Wheel–rail contact models for vehicle system dynamics including multi-point contact. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2005;43:455–483. doi: 10.1080/00423110500141144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knothe K. History of wheel/rail contact mechanics: from Redtenbacher to Kalker. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2008;46:9–26. doi: 10.1080/00423110701586469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enblom R. Deterioration mechanisms in the wheel–rail interface with focus on wear prediction: a literature review. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2009;47:661–700. doi: 10.1080/00423110802331559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso A, Guiral A, Giménez JG. Wheel-rail contact: theoretical and experimental analysis. Int J Railway Technol. 2013;2:15–32. doi:doi:10.4203/ijrt.2.4.2.
   Google Scholar
• Sichani MS, Enblom R, Berg M. Non-elliptic wheel-rail contact modelling in vehicle dynamics simulation. Int J Railway Technol. 2014;3:77–96. doi:doi:10.4203/ijrt.3.3.5.
   Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Silva M. A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2007;45:165–189. doi: 10.1080/00423110600996017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankarani HM, Nikravesh PE. A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. J Mech Design. 1990;112:369–376. doi: 10.1115/1.2912617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach O. A fast wheel-rail forces calculation computer code. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1999;33:728–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo J, Ambrósio J. Application of a wheel-rail contact model to railway dynamics in small radius curved tracks. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2008;19:91–114. doi: 10.1007/s11044-007-9094-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meli E, Ridolfi A. An innovative wheel–rail contact model for railway vehicles under degraded adhesion conditions. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2015;33:285–313. doi: 10.1007/s11044-013-9405-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meli E, Pugi L, Ridolfi A. An innovative degraded adhesion model for multibody applications in the railway field. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2014;32:133–157. doi: 10.1007/s11044-013-9400-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allota B, Conti R, Meli E, Pugi L, Ridolfi A. Railway vehicle dynamics under degraded adhesion conditions: an innovative HIL architecture for braking tests on full-scale roller-rigs. Int J Railway Technol. 2013;2:21–53. doi:doi:10.4203/ijrt.2.3.2.
   Google Scholar
• Sebès M, Chevalier L, Ayasse J-B, Chollet H. A fast-simplified wheel–rail contact model consistent with perfect plastic materials. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2012;50:1453–1471. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.669483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebès M, Chollet H, Ayasse J-B, Chevalier L. A multi-Hertzian contact model considering plasticity. Wear. 2014;314:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignesti M, Innocenti A, Marini L, Meli E, Rindi A. Development of a model for the simultaneous analysis of wheel and rail wear in railway systems. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2014;31:191–240. doi: 10.1007/s11044-013-9360-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekberg A, Åkesson B, Kabo E. Wheel/rail rolling contact fatigue – probe, predict, prevent. Wear. 2014;314:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding J, Li F, Huang Y, Sun S, Zhang L. Application of the semi-Hertzian method to the prediction of wheel wear in heavy haul freight car. Wear. 2014;314:104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama H, Yada M, Yamamoto H, et al. Wheel and rail profile wear on small radius curved tracks and its effect on derailment coefficients: measurement and simulation. Int J Railway Technol. 2013;2:85–98. doi:doi:10.4203/ijrt.2.4.5.
   Google Scholar
• Polach O, Böttcher A. A new approach to define criteria for rail vehicle model validation. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2014;52:125–141. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.881515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez B, Mera JM, Martinez ML, Chover JA. Assessment of the influence of the elastic properties of rail vehicle suspensions on safety, ride quality and track fatigue. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2012;51:280–300. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.725852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez B, Felez J, Maroto J, Rodriguez P. Sensitivity analysis to assess the influence of the inertial properties of railway vehicle bodies on the vehicle's dynamic behaviour. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2012;51:251–279. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.725851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez B, Felez J, Antonio Lozano J, Rodriguez P. Influence of the track quality and of the properties of the wheel–rail rolling contact on vehicle dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2012;51:301–320. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.725853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães H, Ambrósio J, Pombo J. Railway vehicle modelling for the vehicle–track interaction compatibility analysis. Proc IMechE Part K: J Multi-body Dyn. 2015. doi:10.1177/1464419315608275.
   Google Scholar
• Arora JS. Introduction to optimum design. Boston: Academic Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Walter É. Numerical methods and optimization: a consumer guide. Springer International Publishing; 2014. doi:doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07671-3.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Schoenauer M, Deb K, Rudolph G, et al., editors. Parallel problem solving from nature PPSN VI. vol. 1917. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 849–858.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho M, Ambrósio J, Eberhard P. Identification of validated multibody vehicle models for crash analysis using a hybrid optimization procedure. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 2011;44:85–97. doi: 10.1007/s00158-010-0590-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard P, Dignath F, Kübler L. Parallel evolutionary optimization of multibody systems with application to railway dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2003;9:143–164. doi: 10.1023/A:1022515214842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivanandam SN, Deepa SN. Introduction to genetic algorithms. Berlin: Springer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 1983;220:671–680. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4598.671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazi V, Passino KM. Swarm stability and optimization. Berlin: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Aird TJ, Rice JR. Systematic search in high dimensional sets. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1977;14:296–312. doi: 10.1137/0714019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Custódio AL, Madeira JFA. GLODS: global and local optimization using direct search. J Global Optim. 2014;1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo J. A multibody methodology for railway dynamics applications [PhD dissertation]. Lisbon: IDMEC/Department of Mechanical Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, McPhee J. Optimization of the lateral stability of rail vehicles. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2002;38:361–390. doi: 10.1076/vesd.38.5.361.8278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzola L, Bruni S. Effect of suspension parameter uncertainty on the dynamic behaviour of railway vehicles. Appl Mech Mater. 2012;104:177–185. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.104.177
   Google Scholar
• Gear CW. Simultaneous numerical solution of differential-algebraic equations. IEEE T Circuit Theory. 1971;18:89–95. doi: 10.1109/TCT.1971.1083221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UIC 861-2. Profiles Unifiés de Rails à rails-aiguilles adptés aux profils de rails UIC 54 et 60 kg/m. ed.; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Kalker JJ. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Shen ZY, Hedrick JK, Elkins JA. A comparison of alternative creep force models for rail vehicle dynamic analysis. 8th IAVSD symposium on dynamics of vehicles on road and tracks. Cambridge, Massachussetts; 1983. p. 591–605.
   Google Scholar
• Pombo J. Application of a computational tool to study the influence of worn wheels on railway vehicle dynamics. J Software Eng Appl. 2012;5:51–61. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2012.52009
   Google Scholar