Effect of the combined centre of gravity on the running safety of freight wagons

References

• National bureau of statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• European commission. White paper on transport: roadmap to a single European transport area: towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system. Publications Office of the European Union; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Standard. General rules covering loading and reinforcement in railway freight wagons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Technology Center, Inc. General rules covering loading of carload shipments of commodities in closed cars; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist AO, Brickle BV. A re-examination of the proneness to derailment of a railway wheel-set. J Mech Eng Sci. 1976;18(3):131–141. doi: 10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1976_018_023_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock H. Wheel climb derailment criteria for evaluation of rail vehicle safety. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsson A, Berbyuk V, Enelund M. Pareto optimisation of railway bogie suspension damping to enhance safety and comfort. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(9):1379–1407. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.659846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson I, Iwnick SD. Optimisation of railway wheel profiles using a genetic algorithm. Veh Syst Dyn. 2004;41:517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Persson I, Nilsson R, Bik U. Use of a genetic algorithm to improve the rail profile on Stockholm underground. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010;48(Supp1):89–104. doi: 10.1080/00423111003668245
   Google Scholar
• Cheli F, Corradi R, Diana G, et al. Effect of track geometrical defects on running safety of tramcar vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006. 44(Supp1):302–312. doi: 10.1080/00423110600871384
   Google Scholar
• Wan C, Markine VL, Shevtsov IY. Improvement of vehicle–turnout interaction by optimising the shape of crossing nose. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(11):1517–1540. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.944870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong C, Zhang H, Yi Z. Difference and validation of cargo securing rules for road transport in major countries. In: Ma J, Yin Y, Huang H, Pan D, editors. Proceedings of the 14th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals (CICTP 2014): Safe, Smart, and Sustainable Multimodal Transportation Systems; 2014 Jul 4-7; Changsha, China; 2014. p. 853–863.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson P, Sökjer-Petersen S, Jagelčák J. Differences in cargo securing regulations. How could we achieve harmonization? Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Transportation Technology (HVTT), International Forum for Road Transport Technology; Stockholm, Sweden; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker G, Newton W, Seidl M, et al. Potential risks to road and rail transport associated with asymmetric loading of containers, No. PPR691; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Luo G, Zeng J, Wang Q. Identifying the relationship between suspension parameters of underframe equipment and carbody modal frequency. J Mod Transp. 2014;22(4):206–213. doi: 10.1007/s40534-014-0060-0
   Google Scholar
• Huang C, Zeng J, Luo G, et al. Numerical and experimental studies on the car body flexible vibration reduction due to the effect of car body-mounted equipment. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2018;232(1):103–120. doi: 10.1177/0954409716657372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zeng J, Wei L, et al. Study on coupled vibration performance of flexible carbody and under-frame suspended equipment of inter-city EMU. J Adv Veh Eng. 2017;3(1):40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Suda Y, Anderson RJ, Yamada K. Dynamics of unsymmetric suspension trucks with semiactive control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1994;23(S1):480–496. doi: 10.1080/00423119308969535
   Google Scholar
• Suda Y, Grencik J. The mechanism of enhanced curving performance of unsymmetric suspension trucks under acting traction/brake torque. Veh Syst Dyn. 1996;25(S1):629–640. doi: 10.1080/00423119608969225
   Google Scholar
• Sun S, Yang J, Du H, et al. Overcoming the conflict requirement between high-speed stability and curving trafficability of the train using an innovative magnetorheological elastomer rubber joint. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2018;29(2):214–222. doi: 10.1177/1045389X17698591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S. Semi-active MR technology for enhancing vehicle stability and ride comfort; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sun YQ, Dhanasekar M. A dynamic model for the vertical interaction of the rail track and wagon system. Int J Solids Struct. 2002;39(5):1337–1359. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00224-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai WM, Cai CB, Guo SZ. Coupling model of vertical and lateral vehicle/track interactions. Veh Syst Dyn. 1996;26(1):61–79. doi: 10.1080/00423119608969302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana G, Cheli F, Bruni S, et al. Interaction between railroad superstructure and railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 1994;23(S1):75–86. doi: 10.1080/00423119308969506
   Google Scholar
• Fröhling RD. Low frequency dynamic vehicle/track interaction: modelling and simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;29(S1):30–46. doi: 10.1080/00423119808969550
   Google Scholar
• Ripke B, Knothe K. Simulation of high frequency vehicle-track interactions. Veh Syst Dyn. 1995;24(Supp1):72–85. doi: 10.1080/00423119508969616
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Bahn. Lastenheft IC-express. Munich: BZA; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Eom B, Lee HS. Assessment of running safety of railway vehicles using multibody dynamics. Int J Prec Eng Manuf . 2010;11(2):315–320. doi: 10.1007/s12541-010-0036-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida H, Matsuo M. Safety criteria for evaluation of railway vehicle derailment. Q Rep RTRI. 1999;40(1):18–25. doi: 10.2219/rtriqr.40.18
   Google Scholar
• Wanming Z. Vehicle-track coupling dynamics. Beijing: Science Publishing House; 2007.
   Google Scholar