On the handling performance of a vehicle with different front-to-rear wheel torque distributions

References

• Nordeen DL. Vehicle handling: its dependence upon vehicle parameters. SAE Technical Paper; 1964. (Report No.: 640108).
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan TB. Vehicle handling: mathematical characteristics of the driver. SAE Technical Paper; 1963. (Report No.: 630068).
   Google Scholar
• Pacejka HB. Simplified analysis of steady-state turning behaviour of motor vehicles. Part 1. Handling diagrams of simple systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 1973;2(3):161–172. doi: 10.1080/00423117308968439
   Google Scholar
• Barter N. Analysis and interpretation of steady-state and transient vehicle response measurements. Veh Syst Dyn. 1976;5(1–2):79–103. doi: 10.1080/00423117508968407
   Google Scholar
• Verma MK. Transient response test procedures for measuring vehicle directional control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1981;10(6):333–356. doi: 10.1080/00423118108968682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gim G. Vehicle dynamic simulation with a comprehensive model for pneumatic tires; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Farroni F, Russo M, Russo R, et al. A combined use of phase plane and handling diagram method to study the influence of tyre and vehicle characteristics on stability. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(8):1265–1285. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.797590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales ED. Sensitivity study of front suspension parameters in elastokinematics and handling behaviour of a vehicle. SAE Technical Paper; 2016. (Report No.: 2016-36-0182).
   Google Scholar
• Shibahata Y, Shimada K, Tomari T. Improvement of vehicle maneuverability by direct yaw moment control. Veh Syst Dyn. 1993;22(5):465–481. doi: 10.1080/00423119308969044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zanten AT. Bosch esp systems: 5 years of experience. SAE Technical Paper; 2000. (Report No.: 2000-01-1633).
   Google Scholar
• De Novellis L, Sorniotti A, Gruber P. Design and comparison of the handling performance of different electric vehicle layouts. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng. 2014;228(2):218–232. doi: 10.1177/0954407013506569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmailzadeh E, Goodarzi A, Vossoughi G. Optimal yaw moment control law for improved vehicle handling. Mechatronics. 2003;13(7):659–675. doi: 10.1016/S0957-4158(02)00036-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Novellis L, Sorniotti A, Gruber P, et al. Direct yaw moment control actuated through electric drivetrains and friction brakes: Theoretical design and experimental assessment. Mechatronics. 2015;26:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzo B, Sorniotti A, Gruber P, et al. On the experimental analysis of single input single output control of yaw rate and sideslip angle. Int J Automot Technol. 2017;18(5):799–811. doi: 10.1007/s12239-017-0079-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Montanaro U, Fallah S, et al. A gain scheduled robust linear quadratic regulator for vehicle direct yaw moment control. Mechatronics. 2018;51:31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Novellis L, Sorniotti A, Gruber P. Driving modes for designing the cornering response of fully electric vehicles with multiple motors. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2015;64:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzo B, Sorniotti A, De Filippis G, et al. Understeer characteristics for energy-efficient fully electric vehicles with multiple motors. In: EVS29 international battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium proceedings; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• De Filippis G, Lenzo B, Sorniotti A, et al. Energy-efficient torque-vectoring control of electric vehicles with multiple drivetrains. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2018;67(6):4702–4715. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2808186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzo B, De Filippis G, Dizqah A, et al. Torque distribution strategies for energy-efficient electric vehicles with multiple drivetrains. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2017;139(12):121004. doi: 10.1115/1.4037003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Xu Z. Wheel torque distribution of four-wheel-drive electric vehicles based on multi-objective optimization. Energies. 2015;8(5):3815–3831. doi: 10.3390/en8053815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farroni F, Lamberti R, Mancinelli N, et al. Trip-id: A tool for a smart and interactive identification of magic formula tyre model parameters from experimental data acquired on track or test rig. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2018;102:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Novellis L, Sorniotti A, Gruber P, et al. Comparison of feedback control techniques for torque-vectoring control of fully electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 2014;63(8):3612–3623. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2014.2305475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tota A, Lenzo B, Lu Q, et al. On the experimental analysis of integral sliding modes for yaw rate and sideslip control of an electric vehicle with multiple motors. Int J Automot Technol. 2018;19(5):811–823. doi: 10.1007/s12239-018-0078-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chindamo D, Lenzo B, Gadola M. On the vehicle sideslip angle estimation: a literature review of methods, models, and innovations. Appl Sci. 2018;8(3):355. doi: 10.3390/app8030355
   Google Scholar
• Frendo F, Greco G, Guiggiani M. Critical review of handling diagram and understeer gradient for vehicles with locked differential. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(6):431–447. doi: 10.1080/09638230500348184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frendo F, Greco G, Guiggiani M, et al. The handling surface: a new perspective in vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2007;45(11):1001–1016. doi: 10.1080/00423110601164888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchi F, Frendo F. A new formulation of the understeer coefficient to relate yaw torque and vehicle handling. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(6):831–847. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1167225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn RP, Shim T. Independent control of all-wheel-drive torque distribution. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(7):529–546. doi: 10.1080/00423110500485731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelmann J, Plochl M. Analysis of controllability of automobiles at steady-state cornering considering different drive concepts. Proceedings of IAVSD 2017 (Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rill G. Reducing the cornering resistance by torque vectoring. Procedia Eng. 2017;199:3284–3289. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.393
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi F, Lenzo B, Frendo F, et al. The effect of the front-to-rear wheel torque distribution on vehicle handling: an experimental assessment. Proceedings of IAVSD 2017 (Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pacejka H. Tire and vehicle dynamics. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Genta G. Motor vehicle dynamics: modeling and simulation. Singapore: World Scientific; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Guiggiani M. The science of vehicle dynamics: handling, braking, and ride of road and race cars. London: Springer Science & Business Media; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Moors E. On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix. Bull Am Math Soc. 1920;9(26):394–95.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Israel A, Greville TN. Generalized inverses: theory and applications. Vol. 15. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media; 2003.
   Google Scholar