An energy and emission conscious adaptive cruise controller for a connected automated diesel truck

References

• Tate L, Hochgreb S, Hall J, et al. Energy efficiency of autonomous car powertrain; 2018. (SAE Technical Papers 2018-01-1092).
   Google Scholar
• Asadi B, Vahidi A. Predictive cruise control: utilizing upcoming traffic signal information for improving fuel economy and reducing trip time. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2011;19(3):707–714. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2010.2047860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmied R, Waschl H, Quirynen R, et al. Nonlinear MPC for emission efficient cooperative adaptive cruise control. IFAC Papersonline. 2015;48(23):160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.277
   Google Scholar
• Moser D, Schmied R, Waschl H, et al. Flexible spacing adaptive cruise control using stochastic model predictive control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2018;26(1):114–127. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2658193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Salehi R, Stefanopoulou AG. Intelligent cruise control of diesel powered vehicles addressing the fuel consumption versus emissions trade-off. In: 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC); IEEE; 2018. p. 840–845.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Li K, Rajamani R, et al. Model predictive multi-objective vehicular adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2011;19(3):556–566. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2010.2049203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler G, Vahidi A. An optimal velocity-planning scheme for vehicle energy efficiency through probabilistic prediction of traffic-signal timing. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;15(6):2516–2523. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2319306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Alam A, Gattami A, Johansson KH. An experimental study on the fuel reduction potential of heavy duty vehicle platooning. In: 2010 13th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC); IEEE; 2010. p. 306–311.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N, Cimini G, Stefanopoulou AG, et al. Assessing fuel economy from automated driving: influence of preview and velocity constraints. In: ASME 2016 dynamic systems and control conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2016. p. V002T19A001–V002T19A001.
   Google Scholar
• HomChaudhuri B, Vahidi A, Pisu P. Fast model predictive control-based fuel efficient control strategy for a group of connected vehicles in urban road conditions. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2017 March;25(2):760–767. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2572603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam A, Martensson J, Johansson KH. Look-ahead cruise control for heavy duty vehicle platooning. In: 2013 16th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems-(ITSC); IEEE; 2013. p. 928–935.
   Google Scholar
• Stanger T. A model predictive cooperative adaptive cruise control approach. In: American Control Conference (ACC), 2013; IEEE; 2013. p. 1374–1379.
   Google Scholar
• Huang C, Salehi R, Ersal T, et al. Optimal speed planning using limited preview for connected vehicles with diesel engines. In: 14th international symposium on advanced vehicle control; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Protection of environment, 40 C.F.R; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Guo J, Ge Y, Hao L, et al. Comparison of real-world fuel economy and emissions from parallel hybrid and conventional diesel buses fitted with selective catalytic reduction systems. Appl Energy. 2015;159:433–441. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polterauer P, Del Re L. Emission constrained fuel optimal vehicle control with route lookahead. In: 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC); IEEE; 2018. p.5510–5515.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Chen X, Ouyang Y, et al. Emission mitigation via longitudinal control of intelligent vehicles in a congested platoon. Comput-Aided Civ Inf Eng. 2015;30(6):490–506. doi: 10.1111/mice.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kum D, Peng H, Bucknor NK. Optimal energy and catalyst temperature management of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles for minimum fuel consumption and tail-pipe emissions. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2013;21(1):14–26. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2011.2171344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschopp F, Nüesch T, Wang M, et al. Optimal energy and emission management of a diesel hybrid electric vehicle equipped with a selective catalytic reduction system. Warrendale, PA: SAE; 2015. 2015-24-2548.
   Google Scholar
• Nüesch T, Cerofolini A, Mancini G, et al. Equivalent consumption minimization strategy for the control of real driving NOx emissions of a diesel hybrid electric vehicle. Energies. 2014;7(5):3148–3178. doi: 10.3390/en7053148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavataio G, Jen HW, Warner JR, et al. Enhanced durability of a Cu/zeolite based SCR catalyst. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr. 2008;1(2008-01-1025):477–487. doi: 10.4271/2008-01-1025
   Google Scholar
• Chen P, Wang J. Control-oriented model for integrated diesel engine and after treatment systems thermal management. Control Eng Pract. 2014;22:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepreux O, Creff Y, Petit N. Motion planning for a diesel oxidation catalyst outlet temperature. In: 2008 American control conference; IEEE; 2008. p. 2092–2098.
   Google Scholar
• Bresch-Pietri D, Leroy T, Petit N. Control-oriented time-varying input-delayed temperature model for SI engine exhaust catalyst. In: American control conference (ACC), 2013; IEEE; 2013. p. 2189–2195.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey V, Jeanneret B, Gillet S, et al. A simplified thermal model for the three way catalytic converter. In: TAP 2016, 21st international transport and air pollution conference; 2016. 6 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cavataio G, Jen HW, Warner JR, et al. Enhanced durability of a cu/zeolite based scr catalyst. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr. 2009;1(1):477–487. doi: 10.4271/2008-01-1025
   Google Scholar
• Lang D, Stanger T, Schmied R, et al. Predictive cooperative adaptive cruise control: fuel consumption benefits and implementability. In: Optimization and optimal control in automotive systems. Springer; 2014. p. 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• He CR, Maurer H, Orosz G. Fuel consumption optimization of heavy-duty vehicles with grade, wind, and traffic information. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;11(6):061011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentner S, Asprion J, Onder C, et al. An equivalent emission minimization strategy for causal optimal control of diesel engines. Energies. 2014;7(3):1230–1250. doi: 10.3390/en7031230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre S, Sun C, Bajcsy R, et al. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches for vehicle speed prediction. In: 2014 American control conference; IEEE; 2014. p. 3494–3499.
   Google Scholar
• Sun C, Hu X, Moura SJ, et al. Velocity predictors for predictive energy management in hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2014;23(3):1197–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser D, Schmied R, Waschl H, et al. Flexible spacing adaptive cruise control using stochastic model predictive control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2017;26(1):114–127. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2658193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros S, Zanon M, Quirynen R, et al. From linear to nonlinear mpc: bridging the gap via the real-time iteration. Int J Control. 2020;93(1):62–80. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2016.1222553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar