Improved curving performance of an innovative two-axle vehicle: a reasonable feedforward active steering approach

References

• Fu B, Giossi RL, Persson R, et al. Active suspension in railway vehicles: a literature survey. Railw. Eng. Sci. Mar. 2020;28:3–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-020-00207-w
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Goodall R, Mei TX, et al. Control and monitoring for railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn Jul. 2007;45(7–8):743–779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110701426690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach O. Curving and stability optimisation of locomotive bogies using interconnected wheelsets. Veh Syst Dyn 2004;41(SUPPL):53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Park J-H, Koh H-I, Hur H-M, et al. Design and analysis of an active steering bogie for urban trains. J Mech Sci Technol 2010;24(6):1353–1362. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-0341-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umehara Y, Kamoshita S, Ishiguri K, et al. Development of electro-hydraulic actuator with fail-safe function for steering system. Q Rep RTRI. 2014;55(3):131–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.55.131
   Google Scholar
• Shen G, Goodall R. Active yaw relaxation for improved bogie performance. Veh Syst Dyn 1997;28:273–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119708969357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez J, Busturia JM, Goodall RM. Control strategies for active steering of bogie-based railway vehicles. Control Eng Pract 2002;10(9):1005–1012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00070-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen S, Mei TX, Goodall RM, et al. A study of active steering strategies for railway bogie. Veh Syst Dyn 2004;41(suppl):282–291.
   Google Scholar
• Shen S, Mei TX, Goodall RM, et al. Active steering of railway vehicles: a feedforward strategy. In: 2003 European Control Conference (ECC), Cambridge, UK; 2003. p. 2390–2395.
   Google Scholar
• Shen S, Mei TX, Goodall RM, et al. A Novel control strategy for active steering of railway bogies. Proceedings of the Control 2004 Conference. 2004;September. http://ukacc.group.shef.ac.uk/proceedings/control2004/Papers/085.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braghin F, Bruni S, Resta F. Active yaw damper for the improvement of railway vehicle stability and curving performances: simulations and experimental results. Veh Syst Dyn 2006;44(11):857–869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110600733972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qazizadeh A, Stichel S, Feyzmahdavian HR. Wheelset curving guidance using H∞control. Veh Syst Dyn 2018;56(3):461–484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2017.1391396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogestad S., Postlethwaite I. Multivariable feedback control - analysis and design. 3rd ed. Chichester: WileyBlackwell; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Selamat H, Yusof R, Goodall RM. Self-tuning control for active steering of a railway vehicle with solid-axle wheelsets. IET Control Theory Appl 2008;2(5):374–383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta:20070111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz C, Keck A, Brembeck J, et al. Control development for the scaled experimental railway running gear of DLR. 24th Symposium of the International Association for Vehicle System Dynamics (IAVSD 2015). 2016;1:909–918.
   Google Scholar
• Giossi RL, Persson R, Stichel S. Gain scaling for active wheelset steering on innovative two-axle vehicle. In Advances in dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks. IAVSD 2019; 2020. p. 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi Bideleh SM, Mei TX, Berbyuk V. Robust control and actuator dynamics compensation for railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 2016;54(12):1762–1784. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2016.1234627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhat N, Ward CP, Goodall RM, et al. The benefits of mechatronically-guided railway vehicles: a multi-body physics simulation study. Mechatronics (Oxf). 2018;51(March):115–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei TX, Goodall RM, Li H. Kalman filter for the state estimation of a 2-axle railway vehicle..
   Google Scholar
• Heckmann A, Schwarz C, Keck A, et al. Nonlinear observer design for guidance and traction of railway vehicles. In: Advances in dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks. IAVSD 2019; 2020. p. 639–648.
   Google Scholar
• Persson R, Goodall RM, Sasaki K. Carbody tilting – technologies and benefits. Veh Syst Dyn Aug. 2009;47(8):949–981. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110903082234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang IK, Hur HM, Kim MJ, et al. Analysis of the active control of steering bogies for the dynamic characteristics on real track conditions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit. 2018;232(3):722–733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716687454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson E, Berg M, Stichel S. Rail vehicle dynamics; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kalker JJ. Review of wheel/rail rolling contact theories, the general problem of rolling contact. Appl. Mech. Div. ASME. 1980;40:72–92.
   Google Scholar
• Tian S, Luo X, Ren L, et al. Active steering control strategy for rail vehicle based on minimum wear number. Veh Syst Dyn Mar. 2020: 1–26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2020.1743864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall R, Persson R, Baeza L, et al. Innovative Running Gear Solutions for New Dependable, Sustainable, Intelligent and Comfortable Rail Vehicles: Deliverable 3.1; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Charles G, Goodall R, Dixon R. Model-based condition monitoring at the wheel-rail interface. Veh Syst Dyn 2008;46(SUPPL.1):415–430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110801979259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergander B, Kunnes W. ERRI B176/DT 290: B176/3 benchmark problem, results and assessment. Tech. report, Eur. Rail Res. Inst.; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Grether G. Dynamics of a running gear with IRWs on curved tracks for a robust control development. Pamm. 2017;17(1):797–798. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201710366
   Google Scholar