Random vibration analysis of tram-track interaction on a curve due to the polygonal wheel and track irregularity

References

• Jin X, Wu L, Fang J, et al. An investigation into the mechanism of the polygonal wear of metro train wheels and its effect on the dynamic behavior of a wheel/rail system. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(12):1817–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Chi M, Wu P. Influence of polygonal wear of railway wheels on the wheel set axle stress. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(11):1535–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Zhong S, Xiao X, et al. High-speed wheel/rail contact determining method with rotating flexible wheelset and validation under wheel polygon excitation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(12):1817–1834.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Chi M, Gao H. Damage tolerances of a railway axle in the presence of wheel polygonalizations. Eng Fail Anal. 2016;66:44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JCO, Lundén R, Johansson A, et al. Train-track interaction and mechanisms of irregular wear on wheel and rail surfaces. Veh Syst Dyn. 2003;40(1–3):3–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronello C. Analysis of tram-induced vibrations affecting roads and buildings in standard urban sites. Int J Acoust Vib. 2003;8(1):21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Anastasopoulos I, Alfifi S, et al. Train-induced vibrations on urban metro and tram-turnout. J Transp Eng. 2009;135(7):397–405.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen JCO, Johansson A. Out-of-round railway wheels—a literature survey. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2000;214(2):79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brommundt E. A Simple mechanism for the polygonalization of railway wheels by wear. Mech Res Commun. 1997;24(4):435–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staśkiewicz T, Firlik B. Out-of-round tram wheels – current state and measurements. Arch Transp. 2018;45(1):83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Barke DW, Chiu WK. A review of the effects of out-of-round wheels on track and vehicle components. Proc IMechE Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2005;219(3):151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Out-of-round railway wheels. In: Lewis R, Olofsson U, editor. Wheel-rail interface handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011. p. 245–279.
   Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S, 2006. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlbeck DR. A study of dynamic impact load effects due to railroad wheel profile roughness. In Proceedings of 10th IAVSD-Symposium, Prague, Czech Republic, 24 ± 28 August 1987, p. 13 ± 16.
   Google Scholar
• Tao G, Wang L, Wen Z, et al. Measurement and assessment of out-of-round electric locomotive wheels. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2018;232(1):275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Rakheja S, Qu S, et al. Dynamic responses of a high-speed railway car due to wheel polygonalization. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(12):1817–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai W, Chi M, Tao G, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation into the formation of metro wheel polygonalization . Shock Vib. 2019;2019:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TX, Thompson DJ. A double Timoshenko beam model for vertical vibration analysis of railway track at high frequencies. J Sound Vibr. 1999;224(2):329–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostovasilis D, Koroma S.G, Hussein M.F.M., et al., A comparison between the use of straight and curved beam elements for modelling curved railway tracks. 11th International Conference on Vibration Problems, Lisbon, Portugal, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Casas J, Gialleonardo ED, Bruni S, et al. A comprehensive model of the railway wheelset–track interaction in curve. J Sound Vib. 2014;333(22):4152–4169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gialleonardo E, Braghin F, Bruni S. The influence of track modelling options on the simulation of rail vehicle dynamics. J Sound Vib. 2012;331(19):4246–4258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei X, Noda NA. Analyses of dynamic response of vehicle and track coupling system with random irregularity of track vertical profile. J Sound Vibr. 2002;258(1):147–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YL, Xu XY, Zhou Y. An interactive method for the analysis of the simulation of vehicle–bridge coupling vibration using ANSYS and SIMPACK. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2016; DOI: 0954409716684277.
   Google Scholar
• El-Ghandour AI, Hamper MB, Foster CD. Coupled finite element and multibody system dynamics modeling of a three-dimensional railroad system. Proc IMechE Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2014;0(0):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lin JH, Zhang WS, Williams FW. Pseudo excitation algorithm for nonstationary random seismic responses. Eng Struct. 1994;16(4):270–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YW, Zhao Y, Zhang YH, et al. Riding comfort optimization of railway trains based on pseudo-excitation method and symplectic method. J Sound Vib. 2013;332(21):5255–5270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudzikiewicz A, Sowinski B, Melnik R. Modelling and dynamic analyses of a low-floor tram vehicle. Machine Dynamics Research. 2016;40(4):5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lulu GB, Chen R, Wang P, et al. Influence of out-of-round wheels on the vehicle-flexible track interaction at rail welds. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2020;0(0):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Allen P, Mei G, et al. Influence of wheel-polygonal wear on the dynamic forces within the axle-box bearing of a high-speed train. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58(9):1385–1406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar