References
- Wickens A. Fundamentals of rail vehicle dynamics: Guidance and stability. The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers; 2003.
- Braghin F, Bruni S, Resta F. Active yaw damper for the improvement of railway vehicle stability and curving performances: simulations and experimental results. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(11): 857–869.
- Diana G, Bruni S, Cheli F, et al. Active control of the running behaviour of a railway vehicle: stability and curving performances. Veh Syst Dyn. 2002;37(sup1):157–170.
- Matsumoto A, Sato Y, Ohno H, et al. Curving performance evaluation for active-bogie-steering bogie with multibody dynamics simulation and experiment on test stand. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(sup1):191–199.
- Mazzola L, Alfi S, Bruni S. A method to optimize stability and wheel wear in railway bogies. Int J Railw. 2010;3:95–105.
- Mousavi Bideleh SM, Berbyuk V, Persson R. Wear/comfort pareto optimisation of bogie suspension. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(8):1053–1076.
- Goodall RM, Ward CP, Prandi D, et al. Railway bogie stability control from secondary yaw actuators. The Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks: Proceedings of the 24th Symposium of the International Association for Vehicle System Dynamics; 2015 Aug 17–21; Graz, Austria.
- Michálek T, Zelenka J. Reduction of lateral forces between the railway vehicle and the track in small-radius curves by means of active elements. Appl Comput Mech. 2011;5:187–196.
- Stribersky A, Kienberger A, Wagner G, et al. Design and evaluation of a semi-active damping system for rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;29(sup1):669–681.
- O’Neill HR, Wale GD. Semi-active suspension improves rail vehicle ride. Comput Control Eng J. 1994;5(4):183–188.
- Lau YK, Liao WH. Design and analysis of magnetorheological dampers for train suspension. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2005;219:261–276.
- Wang DH, Liao WH. Semi-active suspension systems for railway vehicles using magnetorheological dampers. Part I: system integration and modelling. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009;47(11):1305–1325.
- Di Gialleonardo E, Braghin F, Bruni S. The influence of track modelling options on the simulation of rail vehicle dynamics. J Sound Vib. 2012;331(19):4246–4258.
- Alonso A, Giménez JG, Gomez E. Yaw damper modelling and its influence on railway dynamic stability. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49(9):1367–1387.
- Polach O. On non-linear methods of bogie stability assessment using computer simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2006;220:13–27.
- EN 14363. Railway applications — testing and simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles — running behaviour and stationary tests. Brussels: CEN; 2016.
- Bruni S, Goodall R, Mei TX, et al. Control and monitoring for railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2007;45(7–8):743–779.
- Savaresi S, Poussot-Vassal C, Spelta C, et al. Semi-active suspension control design for vehicles. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2010.
- Faranda R, Leva S. Energy comparison of MPPT techniques for PV systems. WSEAS Trans Power Syst. 2008;3(6):446–455.
- Karnopp D, Crosby MJ, Harwood RA. Vibration control using semi-active force generators. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME. 1974;96(2):619–626
- Esram T, Chapman PL. Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques. IEEE Trans Energy Convers. 2007;22(2):439–449.
- Reza Reisi A, Hassan Moradi M, Jamasb S. Classification and comparison of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;19:433–443.
- Alfi S, Mazzola L, Bruni S. Effect of motor connection on the critical speed of high-speed railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(1):201–214.