Simulation of vehicle-turnout coupled dynamics considering the flexibility of wheelsets and turnouts

References

• Wan C, Markine VL, Shevtsov IY. Improvement of vehicle-turnout interaction by optimising the shape of crossing nose. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014 Nov 2;52(11):1517–1540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassa E, Andersson C, Nielsen JCO. Simulation of dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006 Mar;44(3):247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palsson BA, Nielsen JCO. Dynamic vehicle-track interaction in switches and crossings and the influence of rail pad stiffness – field measurements and validation of a simulation model. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015 Jun 3;53(6):734–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Xu J, Xie K, et al. Numerical simulation of rail profiles evolution in the switch panel of a railway turnout. Wear. 2016;366-367:105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enrique Blanco-Saura A, Luis Velarte-Gonzalez J, Ribes-Llario F, et al. Study of the dynamic vehicle-track interaction in a railway turnout. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2018 May;43(1):21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfi S, Bruni S. Mathematical modelling of train-turnout interaction. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009 2009;47(5):551–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Anastasopoulos I, Alfi S, et al. Effects of train impacts on urban turnouts: modelling and validation through measurements. J Sound Vib. 2009;324(3-5):666–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Xu JM, Liu YB, et al. An investigation into transient frictional rolling contact behaviour in a switch panel: validation and numerical simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020 Aug 4. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2020.1802492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu C, Rodriguez-Arana B, Prada JG, et al. A full explicit finite element simulation for the study of interaction between wheelset and switch panel. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020 Feb 1;58(2):229–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Gao Y, Wang P, et al. Numerical analysis for investigating wheel-rail impact contact in a flange bearing frog crossing. Wear. 2020;450. DOI:10.1016/j.wear.2020.203253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin L, Markine VL, Shevtsov IY. Numerical procedure for fatigue life prediction for railway turnout crossings using explicit finite element approach. Wear. 2016 Nov 15;366:167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Shen C, Li Z, et al. Wheel-rail impact at crossings: relating dynamic frictional contact to degradation. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2017 Jul;12:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Nunez A, Li Z, et al. Evaluating degradation at railway crossings using axle box acceleration measurements. Sensors. 2017 Oct;17:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Sun S, Zhai W. Study on lateral dynamic characteristics of vehicle/turnout system. Veh Syst Dyn. 2005;43(4):285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassa E, Nielsen JCO. Dynamic train-turnout interaction in an extended frequency range using a detailed model of track dynamics. J Sound Vib. 2009 Mar 6;320(4-5):893–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Rakheja S, Ahmed AKW, et al. Influence of a flexible wheelset on the dynamic responses of a high-speed railway car due to a wheel flat. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2018 Apr;232(4):1033–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye Y, Shi D, Krause P, et al. Wheel flat can cause or exacerbate wheel polygonization. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020 Oct 2;58(10):1575–1604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Rakheja S, Qu S, et al. Dynamic responses of a high-speed railway car due to wheel polygonalisation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(12):1817–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han J, Zhong S, Xiao X, et al. High-speed wheel/rail contact determining method with rotating flexible wheelset and validation under wheel polygon excitation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018 2018;56(8):1233–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng B, Iwnicki S, Shackleton P, et al. The influence of wheelset flexibility on polygonal wear of locomotive wheels. Wear. 2019;432-433:102917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z-S, Yang G, Wang S-S, et al. Analysis of vibration and frequency transmission of high speed EMU with flexible model. Acta Mech Sin. 2014 Dec;30(6):876–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeza L, Vila P, Xie G, et al. Prediction of rail corrugation using a rotating flexible wheelset coupled with a flexible track model and a non-Hertzian/non-steady contact model. J Sound Vib. 2011;330(18-19):4493–4507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila P, Baeza L, Martinez-Casas J, et al. Rail corrugation growth accounting for the flexibility and rotation of the wheel set and the non-Hertzian and non-steady-state effects at contact patch. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014 2014;52:92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezin Y, Pålsson BA, Kik W, et al. Multibody simulation benchmark for dynamic vehicle–track interaction in switches and crossings: results and method statements. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021: 1–38. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2021.1959038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwnick S. Manchester benchmarks for rail vehicle simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;30(3–4):295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai W. Vehicle–track coupled dynamics models. In: Vehicle–track coupled dynamics: theory and applications. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 17–149. DOI:10.1007/978-981-32-9283-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Bezin Y, Pålsson BA. Multibody simulation benchmark for dynamic vehicle-track interaction in switches and crossings: modelling description and simulation tasks. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021: 1–16. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2021.1942079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pålsson BA, Ambur R, Sebès M, et al. A comparison of track model formulations for simulation of dynamic vehicle–track interaction in switches and crossings. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021: 1–27. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2021.1983183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pålsson BA. Repository for 60E1 760 1:15 finite element turnout model. Chalmers University of Technology https://snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/study/preview/e7a22588-dd88-4706-83c0-5c3ea437192e.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong S, Xiao X, Wen Z, et al. Effect of wheelset flexibility on wheel-rail contact behavior and a specific coupling of wheel-rail contact to flexible wheelset. Acta Mech Sin. 2016 Apr;32(2):252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KC. An improved stiffly stable method for direct integration of nonlinear structural dynamic equations. J Appl Mech. 1975;42(2):464–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S. Simulation of wheel–rail contact forces. Fatig Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2003;26(10):887–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar