NMPC trajectory planner for urban autonomous driving

References

• Harper CD, Hendrickson CT, Mangones S, et al. Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp Res C. 2016;72:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenblatt JB, Shaheen S. Automated vehicles, on-demand mobility, and environmental impacts. Current Sustainable/renewable Energy Reports. 2015;2(3):74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Paden B, Čáp M, Yong SZ, et al. A survey of motion planning and control techniques for self-driving urban vehicles. IEEE Trans Intel Vehicles. 2016;1(1):33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Sun Z, Cao D, et al. Development of a new integrated local trajectory planning and tracking control framework for autonomous ground vehicles. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017;87:118–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatib O. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Proceedings of the 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Vol. 2. IEEE; 1985. p. 500–505.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein J, Koren Y. Real-time obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1989;19(5):1179–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein J, Koren Y. The vector field histogram-fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots. IEEE Trans Rob Autom. 1991;7(3):278–288.
   Google Scholar
• Koren Y, Borenstein J. Potential field methods and their inherent limitations for mobile robot navigation. Proceedings, 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE; 1991, p. 1398–1404.
   Google Scholar
• Judd K, McLain T. Spline based path planning for unmanned air vehicles. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit; 2001. p. 4238.
   Google Scholar
• Fleury S, Soueres P, Laumond JP, et al. Primitives for smoothing mobile robot trajectories. IEEE Trans Rob Autom. 1995;11(3):441–448.
   Google Scholar
• LaValle SM. Rapidly-exploring random trees: a new tool for path planning. The Annual Research Report. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Karaman S, Frazzoli E. Optimal kinodynamic motion planning using incremental sampling-based methods. 2010 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE; 2010. p. 7681–7687.
   Google Scholar
• Berntorp K. Path planning and integrated collision avoidance for autonomous vehicles. 2017 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE; 2017. p. 4023–4028.
   Google Scholar
• Pepy R, Lambert A, Mounier H. Path planning using a dynamic vehicle model. 2006 2nd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies. Vol. 1. IEEE; 2006. p. 781–786.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy B, Kelly A. Trajectory generation for car-like robots using cubic curvature polynomials. Field and Service Robots. 2001;11:479–490.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, He Y, Bu C, et al. Quartic bézier curve based trajectory generation for autonomous vehicles with curvature and velocity constraints. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2014. p. 6108–6113.
   Google Scholar
• Alia C, Gilles T, Reine T, et al. Local trajectory planning and tracking of autonomous vehicles, using clothoid tentacles method. 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE; 2015. p. 674–679.
   Google Scholar
• De Doná J, Suryawan F, Seron M, et al. A flatness-based iterative method for reference trajectory generation in constrained NMPC. In: Nonlinear model predictive control. Springer; 2009. p. 325–333.
   Google Scholar
• Qian X, Navarro I, de La Fortelle A, et al. Motion planning for urban autonomous driving using bézier curves and MPC. 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE; 2016. p. 826–833.
   Google Scholar
• Falcone P, Borrelli F, Asgari J, et al. Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2007;15(3):566–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcone P, Borrelli F, Asgari J, et al. Low complexity MPC schemes for integrated vehicle dynamics control problems. 9th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Liniger A, Domahidi A, Morari M. Optimization-based autonomous racing of 1: 43 scale rc cars. Optim Control Appl Methods. 2015;36(5):628–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frasch JV, Gray A, Zanon M, et al. An auto-generated nonlinear MPC algorithm for real-time obstacle avoidance of ground vehicles. 2013 European Control Conference (ECC). IEEE; 2013. p. 4136–4141.
   Google Scholar
• Gray A, Gao Y, Lin T, et al. Predictive control for agile semi-autonomous ground vehicles using motion primitives. American Control Conference (ACC), 2012. IEEE; 2012. p. 4239–4244.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Gray A, Frasch JV, et al. Spatial predictive control for agile semi-autonomous ground vehicles. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gutjahr B, Gröll L, Werling M. Lateral vehicle trajectory optimization using constrained linear time-varying MPC. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2017;18(6):1586–1595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong J, Pfeiffer M, Schildbach G, et al. Kinematic and dynamic vehicle models for autonomous driving control design. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; 2015. p. 1094–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Inghilterra G, Arrigoni S, Braghin F, et al. Firefly algorithm-based nonlinear MPC trajectory planner for autonomous driving. 2018 International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive; 2018. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni S, Trabalzini E, Bersani M, et al. Non-linear MPC motion planner for autonomous vehicles based on accelerated particle swarm optimization algorithm. 2019 AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE); 2019. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni S, Braghin F, Cheli F. MPC trajectory planner for autonomous driving solved by genetic algorithm technique. Vehicle Syst Dyn [Internet]. 2021;1–26. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2021.1999991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacejka HB, Bakker E. The magic formula tyre model. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 1992;21(S1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Houska B, Ferreau HJ, Diehl M. Acado toolkit–an open-source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization. Optim Control Appl Methods. 2011;32(3):298–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreau HJ, Kirches C, Potschka A, et al. qpoases: a parametric active-set algorithm for quadratic programming. Math Program Comput. 2014;6(4):327–363.
   Google Scholar
• Carmaker 7.0.2. IPG Automotive GmbH. Karlsruhe, Germany. https://ipg-automotive.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Jo K, Lee M, Kim J, et al. Tracking and behavior reasoning of moving vehicles based on roadway geometry constraints. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2017;18(2):460–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentasti S, Matteucci M. Multi-layer occupancy grid mapping for autonomous vehicles navigation. 2019 International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive. IEEE; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kocić J, Jovičić N, Drndarević V. Sensors and sensor fusion in autonomous vehicles. 2018 26th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR). IEEE; 2018. p. 420–425.
   Google Scholar
• Braghin F, Cheli F, Leo E, et al. Dinamica dell'autoveicolo. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Shim T, Ghike C. Understanding the limitations of different vehicle models for roll dynamics studies. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2007;45(3):191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamani R. Vehicle dynamics and control. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson NJ. Shakey the robot. 1984. (Technical Report, no. 323). Available from https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10004211424/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Micaelli A, Samson C. Trajectory tracking for unicycle-type and two-steering-wheels mobile robots [PhD dissertation]. INRIA; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ploechl M. Road and off-road vehicle system dynamics handbook (G. Mastinu, editor) (1st ed.). CRC Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15560.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni S, Mentasti S, Cheli F, et al. Design of a prototypical platform for autonomous and connected vehicles. 2021 AEIT International Conference on Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE); 2021. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Vignati M, Tarsitano D, Cheli F. On how to transform a commercial electric quadricycle into a full autonomously actuated vehicle. 14th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC'18); 2018. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brach RM, Brach RM. Modeling combined braking and steering tire forces. SAE Technical Paper; 2000. (Tech. Rep.).
   Google Scholar
• Brach R, Brach M. The tire-force ellipse (friction ellipse) and tire characteristics. SAE Technical Paper; 2011. (Tech. Rep.).
   Google Scholar
• Bock HG, Plitt KJ. A multiple shooting algorithm for direct solution of optimal control problems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 1984;17(2):1603–1608.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Bock HG, Schlöder JP, et al. Real-time optimization and nonlinear model predictive control of processes governed by differential-algebraic equations. J Process Control. 2002;12(4):577–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Bock HG, Schlöder JP. A real-time iteration scheme for nonlinear optimization in optimal feedback control. SIAM J Control Optim. 2005;43(5):1714–1736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Findeisen R, Allgöwer F. A stabilizing real-time implementation of nonlinear model predictive control. In: Real-time PDE-constrained optimization. SIAM; 2007. p. 25–52.
   Google Scholar
• Best MJ. An algorithm for the solution of the parametric quadratic programming problem. In: Applied mathematics and parallel computing. Springer; 1996. p. 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bersani M, Mentasti S, Dahal P, et al. An integrated algorithm for ego-vehicle and obstacles state estimation for autonomous driving. Rob Auton Syst. 2021;139. Article Id 103662. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889020305029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar